The risk of water quality impairment from agricultural runoff depends on nutrient source, transport, and bioavailability. Phosphorus (P) spirals between dissolved and particulate forms as it is transported with suspended sediment (SS) from agricultural fields, through the stream network, to receiving water bodies. This dynamic sorption-desorption influences bioavailability. We quantified P form and abundance in samples collected during surface-runoff events from a farm field in the East River Basin, Wisconsin and compared them to those in stream water collected from the East River. We sampled five events between late March 2022 and June 2023. During most events, P in surface runoff was mainly in dissolved form, with particulate P sorbed to fine clay, the most abundant particle fraction transported from the field, whereas P in stream water was mainly in particulate form and sorbed to silt, even though fine clay was the most abundant particle fraction in the stream during events. Overall capacity for P sorption to SS in the stream varied among events. Total P and SS concentrations were lower during summer baseflow conditions and smaller surface runoff events; however, what SS was present was more P enriched. This shift in P form from field to stream indicates a potential for sorbing dissolved P to SS during transport through the stream network, which changes the bioavailability of P exported downstream with less bioavailable P as dissolved P binds to SS.
The East River, an agricultural tributary to the Lower Fox River and Lake Michigan in Wisconsin, USA, has excessive phosphorus (P) and suspended-sediment loads that contribute to downstream eutrophication and habitat-related impairments. Spatial variations and connectivity in the sources and streambed storage of soft, fine-grained (silt and clay) sediment and related sediment-bound P (sed-P) were examined, from first-order ephemeral channels to a downstream water-monitoring station. Analysis included field inventories, a channel corridor sediment and sed-P budget applied to an extended channel network, and geochemical fingerprinting. Corridor inventories included mass wasting along valley sides, eroding streambanks, gullying along perennial and ephemeral channels, and streambed storage volumes in perennial reaches; each converted to masses. Erosion results estimate 7400 Mg/yr of fine-grained sediment, similar to the mean annual suspended sediment load of 5400 Mg/yr. Corridor erosion contributed 7200 kg/yr of sed-P, less than the mean annual particulate-P load of 10,000 kg/yr P. Soft sediment storage was 1400 Mg, with 1500 kg sed-P. Apportionment of soft sediment as streambank sourced was spatially variable, contributing >= 95 % in high order reaches with high storage and as little as 20 % in upstream reaches, where gully, crop, and forest provided the remainder. Two nearby tributaries showed similarity in the predominance of streambank-sourced material in stored soft sediment but differences in geomorphic setting affected its spatial distribution. The results of this study show the importance of including corridor erosion as a source of sediment and sed-P in agricultural basins, which can be helpful in decision-making regarding conservation practices.
Some of the most biologically diverse coastal wetlands and estuaries are found along the Great Lakes, but the spatial extent and timing of river-related inundation and sedimentation vary greatly among natural and altered systems. We used hydrologic data, geomorphic change detection, and satellite imagery to study inundation and sedimentation patterns in the naturally dynamic estuary of the Bad River (Mashkiiziibii) that flows into Lake Superior (Anishinaabeg-gichigami), and the Kakagon River (Ogaakaagaang-ziibii) that flows into a sheltered bay (Chi-Kaamigong). In 2016, an extreme summer flood (annual exceedance probability < 0.2 %) caused total inundation of the 46-km(2) estuary. Floods from the sediment-rich Bad River, with an annual exceedance probability of <= 50 %, have overflowed into the upper wetlands and channels of the Kakagon River about 60 times over the last 75 years, including 20 floods during the most recent 10-year wet period. Sedimentation patterns were associated with proximity to river channels, shoreline erosion, and wind action. Early winter ice-up coupled with a storm surge and an early spring snowmelt into the iced-over bay changed inundation duration and sedimentation patterns. Climate-change projections for more intense rainfall and warmer temperatures will likely cause more frequent flooding and sedimentation; however, patterns may differ depending on the timing of the floods relative to storm surges and ice formation, or other factors. The approach of integrating readily available data helped give a broader temporal and spatial context to the possible causes for inundation and sedimentation, some expected and others not, in natural and restored estuaries of the Great Lakes.
The Little Fork River, a forested watershed in northern Minnesota, United States, is a disproportionate contributor of sediment and phosphorus to Rainy River and Lake of the Woods. Sources of sediment and sediment-bound phosphorus to the Little Fork were investigated using complementary lines of evidence in the form of geochemical sediment fingerprinting and a stream-corridor sediment budget that included harvested forest and ravines, in addition to upland forest and agriculture, roads, and streambanks. Near-channel ravine and streambank sources comprised 95-100 % of streambed sediment and 79-100 % of suspended sediment at the river mouth, while tributaries had up to 50% of suspended sediment from upland sources including harvested forest, agriculture, and roads. Repeat suspended-sediment sampling at eight sites showed more source variability among sites than across events. Ravine erosion was the watershed's largest contributor to downstream sediment and sediment-bound phosphorus loading, while streambed sediment had a larger streambank source. Near-channel erosion also contributed phosphorus, though with less labile and redox-sensitive forms than forest and agricultural soils. In contrast to observations from agricultural settings, suspended-sediment phosphorus concentrations were elevated above some, but not all sources. The effects of watershed size, glacial history, land cover, and variable temperature and precipitation on runoff generation and peak streamflow are important considerations for mitigating near-channel loss of sediment and phosphorus in the Little Fork. These results suggest that management of sediment and phosphorus export from the Little Fork could incorporate context for location in the watershed, geomorphic setting, and runoff characteristics.
Identifying suspended-sediment (SS) sources, seasonal variability, and phosphorus (P) transported with SS is critical information for basin managers, although there may be concerns about comparability between flow-integrated SS samples used for sediment fingerprinting and discrete samples used for concentrations and loads in basins where SS is mostly silt + clay and(or) one land-use predominates. Objectives were to determine if (1) sample-collection method and (2) source consideration influenced apportionment of the largest SS source. Concurrent-replicate, SS samples were collected during 2022 from the East River, Wisconsin using an automated sampler, commonly used for water-quality sampling, and passive samplers, frequently used for SS fingerprinting. Samples were evaluated for differences in physical and chemical characteristics that may affect source apportionment. Considered sources included three upland land-use (cropland, forest, and roads), two in-channel (streambank and streambed sediment), and one that connects uplands to the stream channel (gullies). Source apportionment used established methods in the SedSAT tool. Source scenarios included land-use + streambank (4src), 4src + gully, 4src + streambed, and 4src + gully + streambed (6src). There were no statistically significant differences in median grain size, organic carbon, or sediment-bound P as a function of collection method. In-channel sources were the largest proportional SS source, regardless of season, hydrologic condition, collection method, or source scenario. Source verification highlighted which source fingerprints were most accurately defined and implications for SS target apportionment. Varying the source scenarios for sediment fingerprinting indicated that improved management of hydrologic connectivity between upland land use and the stream channel has the potential to mitigate SS loads.
We described abundance and source of soft, fine-grained, streambed sediment and associated phosphorus (sed-P) during summer low flow in Little Flatrock Creek (LFR), a channelized tributary of the Maumee River and western Lake Erie. Reach-level assessments compared streambed-sediment storage to streambank erosion. Streambed sediment was fingerprinted and analyzed for sed-P and the potential for P de/sorption between the water column and streambed sediment. The ratio of two fallout radionuclides apportioned "new sediment" in streambed storage. Basin-wide streambed-sediment storage exceeded both annual streambank erosion and the annual suspended-sediment load. Streambed sediment was generally a mix of streambank and cropland sources and each equaled or exceeded abundance of new streambed sediment, indicating accumulation of sediment from both sources during the current agricultural cycle. The implication is that this mix of new and old sediment, and legacy P, takes multiple events and seasons to be transported downstream. Streambed sediment had the potential to adsorb dissolved P (DP) from the water column, with sed-P stored in the silt + clay fraction similar to the annual particulate-P (total-dissolved) load transported with suspended sediment, but with lower concentrations than cropland- and streambank-sourced sediment. This indicates supplementation of water-column DP as sediment settles to the bottom and a lag between land and channel management and in-channel P availability. Storage of fine-grained sediment and sed-P in this lake-plain/bed basin is distinct from another Maumee headwater tributary with glacial-moraine controlled geomorphology. The implication is that streambank erosion, in-channel sediment accumulation, and the resultant total-dissolved-sediment P spiral differ based on geomorphic setting and drainage history.
To better understand the primary drivers of the thermal regime in a Great Lakes estuary, and their implications for local biota, water temperature variations in the Milwaukee Estuary of Lake Michigan were studied between July and October of 2019 using a network of 25 sensors at 18 locations. Like Lake Michigan, the estuary was thermally stratified July to October, and historically dredged channels with water depths greater than 6 m allowed for the free movement of cold lake water into the estuary. However, temperatures in the estuary fluctuated rapidly both spatially and temporally, reflecting lake temperature fluctuations driven by changing meteorological conditions. Lake-driven upwelling and downwelling events influenced water temperature more than tributary contributions. Periodic upwelling and downwelling events caused temperature changes by up to 15 degrees C in less than 24 h. Nearshore upwelling events occasionally allowed cold, hypolimnetic lake water to reach tributary portions of the estuary beyond dredged areas, while downwelling events disrupted thermal stratification and caused the deep, dredged portions of the estuary to exceed 20 degrees C. Thermal impacts from these events were especially noticeable in transition zones between dredged and not dredged channels less than 2 m deep. The warming effects from downwelling persisted longer inside the estuary - up to two weeks - than cooling effects from upwelling, which typically lasted a few days. The predominantly lake-driven, rapid summer water temperature fluctuations observed in the Milwaukee Estuary serve as an important consideration in habitat restoration activities happening in Great Lakes estuaries.
Objective We described source and phosphorus (P) retention potential of soft, fine-grained, streambed sediment and associated phosphorus (sed-P) during summer low-flow conditions. Combining in-channel, sed-P storage with relative age provided context on relevance to western Lake Erie Basin management goals. Methods In 2019, rapid geomorphic assessment (30 reaches) compared streambed-sediment storage (S) to streambank erosion (E), providing annual sediment budgets (S:E). Streambed sediment (13 reaches) was fingerprinted and analyzed for sed-P. The P saturation ratio (PSR; four reaches) quantified potential sorption/desorption of dissolved P (DP) between the water column and streambed sediment. Analyses were supplemented with data from 2017 and 2021. The ratio of two fallout radionuclides, beryllium-7 (54-day half-life) and excess lead-210 (22.3 years), apportioned “new” sediment based on time since rainfall contact. Results Streambed sediment was mostly streambank (54–96%) for contributing areas > 2.7 km 2 ; for upstream reaches, a larger percentage was apportioned as upland (cropland, pasture, forest, and road), with < 30% streambank. Streambank erosion correlated with contributing area; however, soil type (ecoregion), stream characteristics, and land use combined to drive streambed-sediment storage. Individual-reach S:E (accumulation of 0.01–35 years of streambank erosion) differentiated erosional and depositional in-channel environments. Most reaches indicated that 17–57% of sediment had recent contact with rainfall. Streambed-sediment PSR indicated a low potential for further sorption of DP from the water column; one reach was a P source when sampled. Conclusion Sed-P was higher in streambed sediment than in source samples, which varied by land use and ecoregion. This indicates homogenization resulting from in-stream sorption of DP during sediment transport that occurs over multiple events.
PURPOSE:Sediment fingerprinting of fluvial targets has proven useful to guide conservation management and prioritize sediment sources for Federal and State supported programs in the United States. However, the collection and analysis of source samples can make these studies unaffordable, especially when needed for multiple drainage basins. We investigate the potential use of source samples from a basin with similar physiography (using samples from one of a "pair" to evaluate samples from the other) or combined from multiple basins (a "library").METHODS:Source samples from eight basins across six ecoregions were harvested from existing, published studies. Individual source samples were fingerprinted using a mixing model derived from source samples from other basins. The ability to identify source category was evaluated both as part of source verification and by classifying source samples as "targets."RESULTS:Approximately half of cropland samples were identified as targets, both as pairs and with the multi-basin source dataset, indicating that cropland samples could be shared for basins in similar ecoregions and be combined for larger stream systems. Streambank samples were better identified with the multi-basin analysis relative to the pairs, and those from mixed land-use basins improved this differentiation except for samples from basins with a dominant land-use type. Inconsistent identification of pasture samples highlighted the need for local samples. Inconsistent identification of forest samples indicated that upland- and riparian-forest samples are distinct. Road samples were identified as both sources and targets, and other source types were rarely apportioned as road: these may have the best potential to supplement local source samples. This source-sample library was then used to improve the accuracy of sediment-source apportionment for a previously studied basin.CONCLUSION:Ultimately, the source verification process already used in individual basin studies to evaluate the accuracy of sediment-fingerprinting apportionments was useful for determining how to supplement local source samples with those from other basins. This study shows that supplementing local source samples with those from basins with similar physiography has the potential to both improve fingerprinting accuracy and decrease the cost of this type of study.
Fluvial systems provide a variety of habitats that support thousands of species including many that are threatened or endangered. Moreover, these habitats, which range from aquatic and riparian to floodplain, are important for the variety of ecosystem services they provide. In addition to water temperature and streamflow change, geomorphic change is important and warrants consideration as one of the several potential threats to these habitats posed by climate change. The geomorphic response of fluvial systems to global warming in temperate environments, for example, caused by an increase in the frequency and magnitude of floods, is important because geomorphology is a primary determinant of habitat availability and quality. Possible geomorphic responses include increased erosion and (or) deposition in the river channel, riparian zone, and floodplain with associated habitat implications. Geomorphic changes caused by global warming can be beneficial (e.g., increased habitat complexity) or detrimental (e.g., mortality caused by scour or burial) to biota. The ability of a species to respond to and survive disturbances, including geomorphic changes, will depend on the nature of the disturbances and the sensitivity and adaptive capabilities of the species. Post‐flood recovery often is rapid; however, for certain species (e.g., periphyton, macroinvertebrates), changes in community composition may persist. Increased flood frequency, sediment mobility, and associated geomorphic changes potentially will result in more frequent and persistent changes in habitat and community composition in the affected fluvial systems.
Spilled oil in inland waterways can aggregate with mineral and organic particles to form oil-particle aggregates (OPAs). OPAs can be transported in suspension or deposited to the bed. Modeling the fate and transport of OPAs can provide useful information for making mitigation decisions. A novel open-source tool, FluOil, is developed to predict where OPAs may deposit and when they arrive in affected river/lake reaches by implementing the random walk particle tracking algorithm to represent the advection, diffusion, deposition, and resuspension of OPAs. The usability of FluOil is demonstrated with the 2010 Kalamazoo River oil spill case study. An unsteady hydrodynamic model simulates the river hydraulics and provides hydraulic data for use in FluOil. Settling velocity and critical shear stress for resuspension are the most important OPA properties concerning the transport and deposition of OPAs. Settling velocity determines the vertical distribution of OPAs and, thus, the travel speed, whereas critical shear stress determines where and when OPAs are deposited and resuspended.
Accurately determining sediment loads is necessary for managing river environments but is difficult because multiple processes can lead to large discharge-independent changes in sediment transport. Thus, estimations of sediment load using discharge-sediment rating curves fit to sparse or historical sediment-transport measurements can be inaccurate, necessitating alternative approaches to reduce uncertainty. Continuous sediment-transport measurements reduce uncertainty because they can be used to detect discharge-independent changes in transport and are therefore unaffected by hysteresis. We used largely continuous approaches to measure sand transport in the lower Chippewa River, a large sand-supplying tributary to the Mississippi River. We used side-looking acoustic-Doppler profilers to continuously measure suspended-sand concentration, and bedform-tracking techniques to episodically measure bedload transport. Bedload transport was then continuously estimated using a discharge-dependent ratio of bedload to suspended-sand transport. This approach allowed determination of sand loads that were not estimated based only on water discharge. Our continuous suspended-sand measurements show that hysteresis between discharge and suspended-sand concentration occurs during most floods. Quasi-continuous bed-elevation measurements using a scour monitor show that lags between discharge and dune geometric adjustment is also common, causing hysteresis between discharge and bed-load transport during floods. Furthermore, comparisons of our measurements with historical sediment-transport measurements indicate large discharge-independent declines in both suspended-sand and bedload transport since the 1980s. These findings indicate that sand transport is a non-stationary function of water discharge over time-scales ranging from within individual floods to decades. Consequently, although our continuous-measurement approach yields only a 2030% improvement over rating-curve estimates of sand load over multi-year periods, our approach yields up to a factor-of-five improvement in sand-load estimates over the shorter, within a flood time-scales, over which the largest discharge-independent changes in sand transport occur.
Like many impaired Great Lakes tributaries, Apple Creek, Wisconsin (119 km2) has Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) targets for reducing suspended sediment and total phosphorus by 51.2 % and 64.2 %, respec-tively. From August 2017 -October 2018, a stream sediment budget and fingerprinting integrated study was conducted to quantify upland and stream corridor sources of suspended sediment and sediment -bound phosphorus. Phosphorus concentrations varied among source groups and fluvial sediments, with higher concentrations among suspended sediment and cropland soils. Eroding streambanks identified in the stream corridor sediment budget accounted for 100 % of the TMDL Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) suspended sediment load but only 20 % of the total phosphorus load. Fine-grained streambed sediment equated to approximately-three years of modeled suspended sediment load but only one third of total phosphorus load. The two primary sources of fine-grained streambed sediment were streambanks and cropland, with relative streambank contributions increasing with downstream direction and water-shed area. The relative proportion of suspended sediment varied by season and streamflow; however, cropland and streambank erosion accounted for 54 % and 23 % of the suspended sediment when weighted by of the proportion for representative streamflow. Urban land was a source in the upper watershed, but the signature was sequestered by a mid-watershed detention basin. Contributions from construction sites were higher in the fall 2018, likely corresponding to increased activity following a wet spring. These integrated techniques helped describe sources, transport, and sinks of fluvial sediment and phos-phorus throughout the watershed at a range of spatial and temporal scales.Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of International Association for Great Lakes Research. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
The interface between lotic and lentic ecosystems is often a zone of intense metabolic activity, as primary production in streams and rivers can be light limited whereas nutrients often limit primary production in lake ecosystems. Our objective was to model the influence that rivermouths (the lotic-lentic interface) could have on the loads of soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (N) passing from the tributary to the nearshore zone of a lake. To achieve this objective, we modeled the combined role of water column nutrient transformation rates with sediment nutrient flux rates. For sensitivity analysis, we picked plausible parameter ranges based on values previously measured in the Fox rivermouth (a tributary to Lake Michigan). Sensitivity analysis of the model demonstrated that overall the importance of water column processing rates increases with increasing nutrient concentration and discharge. We then applied the model to the Fox rivermouth, simulating the change in nutrients on four dates where all of the necessary parameters had been estimated. This modeling suggests that the Fox rivermouth is often a net sink for SRP and source for ammonia (NH4), with water column processing driving SRP removal and both water column and sediment flux driving NH4 dynamics. Removal of SRP in the water column means conversion to particulate and/or organic P, and those P pools are generally considered to be less bioavailable than SRP, so it may be that rivermouths disconnect upstream sources of nutrients from nearshore food webs. These results demonstrate that the interface zone between lotic and lentic systems has the potential to substantially alter the load and character of nutrients as river waters pass through rivermouths to adjacent nearshore areas.
The U.S. Army Corps Regulatory Program considers the loss (impacts) and gain (compensatory mitigation) of aquatic resource functions as part of Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting and compensatory mitigation decisions. To better inform this regulatory decision-making, the Regulatory Program needs transparent and objective approaches to assess the function and condition of aquatic resources, including streams. Therefore, the Regulatory Program needs function-based stream assessments (1) to characterize a stream’s condition or function, (2) to improve understanding of the impact of a proposed action on an aquatic resource, and/or (3) to inform the development of stream compensatory mitigation tools rooted in stream condition and/or function. A function-based stream assessment can provide regulatory decision makers with the resources to objectively consider alternatives, minimize impacts, assess unavoidable impacts, determine mitigation requirements, and monitor the success of mitigation projects. A multiagency National Committee on Stream Assessment (NCSA) convened to create these guidelines to inform the development of new methods and evaluation of both national-level and regional methods currently in use. The resulting guidelines present nine phases, including rationale and recommendations to facilitate work efforts. The NCSA hopes that this technical guide promotes transparency, technical defensibility, and consistent application of stream assessments in the Regulatory Program.