OBJECTIVE:The objective of this study was to summarize the available evidence regarding the clinical value and trend over time of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) opening pressure utilization to diagnose spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). BACKGROUND:CSF opening pressure obtained via lumbar puncture is one of the diagnostic criteria for SIH based on the International Criteria for Headache Disorders, 3rd Edition (ICHD-3), but it has questionable utility as an initial investigation for diagnosing SIH. METHODS:The authors performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to October 2022. Original studies and case series in English reporting three or more patients with suspected or known SIH and CSF pressure measurement were included. Meta-analyses and meta-regression were used to calculate pooled estimates and examine the impact of age, sex, and publication year on outcomes, including CSF pressure < 60 mm CSF, orthostatic headache, and positive findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), spinal imaging, and radionuclide studies. RESULTS:For every 1-year increase in the year of publication, the odds of reporting low CSF pressure decreased by 6.20% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.94, aOR 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.90, 0.97], p = 0.001), the odds of reporting a positive brain MRI increased by 4.67% (aOR = 1.05, aOR 95% CI = [1.01, 1.09], p = 0.026), and the odds of reporting orthostatic headache increased by 9.13% (aOR = 1.09, aOR 95% CI = [1.03, 1.15], p = 0.002). Each 1% increase in the percentage of patients with orthostatic headache was associated with a 3.13% increase in the odds of low CSF pressure (aOR = 1.03, aOR 95% CI = [1.01, 1.05], p = 0.003). Similarly, as the percentage of patients with low CSF pressure increased by 1%, there was a 2.53% increase in the odds of orthostatic headache (aOR = 1.03, aOR 95% CI = [1.01, 1.04], p = 0.005). It was estimated that 31.9% of patients with SIH had normal opening pressure (95% CI = [24.0%, 40.8%], prediction interval = [5.0%, 80.5%]). Every 1% increase in the percentage of patients with positive brain MRI was associated with a 5.25% increase in the odds of positive spinal imaging (aOR = 1.05, aOR 95% CI = [1.00, 1.11], p = 0.047). Age and positive radionuclide study did not significantly impact the outcomes measured. The corresponding I2 for each outcome was reduced by controlling for study-wide covariates believed to impact the prevalence of each outcome. Sensitivity analyses did not reveal discrepancies in results when studies requiring outcomes of interest were removed. CONCLUSION:Our analysis found that recent studies indicate a reduced reliance on opening pressure for diagnosing SIH. Rather, results suggest an increasing reliance on contrast-enhanced brain MRI, spine imaging, and clinical features for SIH diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND:This study was undertaken to review the published literature and provide a position statement from the American Headache Society regarding the safety, efficacy, and impact on access to care of telemedicine for the clinical management of patients with headache disorders. Access to specialized care in headache medicine is severely limited in the United States and worldwide. Telemedicine has been used as an approach to care delivery in headache medicine for more than a decade, with accelerated adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is now uncertainty regarding the extent to which telemedicine will be accepted by health systems and reimbursed by payers moving forward. The purpose of this position statement is to summarize evidence and clinical experience supporting the utility of telemedicine in headache medicine. METHODS:Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of telemedicine, and patient and clinician satisfaction with the use of telemedicine for headache specialty care, was gathered from a variety of sources, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The results and conclusions based upon these results were reviewed and discussed by the authors and the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society to confirm consistency with clinical experience and to achieve consensus. RESULTS:Several randomized clinical trials and observational studies have been performed to compare telemedicine with in-person visits in the management of patients with headache disorders. These studies showed consistently that telemedicine is noninferior to in-person care based upon multiple outcome measures, including disability measures, patient satisfaction, and clinician satisfaction. In addition, these studies found that telemedicine rarely leads to a missed diagnosis of secondary headache or mismanagement of primary headache. Telemedicine has substantial advantages for patients, including improved access to care and reduced costs associated with obtaining care. Studies evaluating health care utilization indicate no significant differences between patients evaluated and treated virtually versus in person. Obvious limitations of telemedicine include the inability to perform an in-person physical exam or to perform injections. For a substantial number of patients, however, these limitations are outweighed by its advantages. The experience with telemedicine reported in the literature is consistent with the experience of the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society, who endorse its use for patients when feasible and appropriate. CONCLUSION:Telemedicine has significantly advanced the care of patients with headache disorders. Its further development and deployment should be supported and reimbursed.

To profile the clinical features associated with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) and better characterize how SIH impacts quality-of-life (QOL).

Purpose of Review:This review focuses on the challenges of diagnosing and treating spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH), a condition caused by spinal CSF leakage. It emphasizes the need for increased awareness and advocates for early and thoughtful use of empirical epidural blood patches (EBPs) in suspected cases. Recent Findings:SIH diagnosis is hindered by variable symptoms and inconsistent imaging results, including normal brain MRI and unreliable spinal opening pressures. It is crucial to consider SIH in differential diagnoses, especially in patients with connective tissue disorders. Early EBP intervention is shown to improve outcomes. Summary:SIH remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, requiring heightened awareness and understanding. This review promotes proactive EBP use in managing suspected SIH and calls for continued research to advance diagnostic and treatment methods, emphasizing the need for innovative imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis and timely intervention.

OBJECTIVE:To report a case of hemicrania continua (HC) and persistent visual aura without infarction in a patient with previous episodic migraine with visual aura, whose persistent aura symptoms improved only after treatment with divalproex sodium. BACKGROUND:Once regarded as highly specific for migraine, visual aura has been associated with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias, including HC. In previous descriptions of HC and episodes of typical visual aura, the aura occurred exclusively with severe headache exacerbations and, like the pain, resolved with indomethacin. METHODS:Case report and literature review. RESULTS:A 54-year-old man with a history of episodic migraine with visual aura reported a gradual onset of HC with persistent visual aura of 15 months duration. General medical and neurological examinations were normal, including imaging studies. HC's headache responded to indomethacin, while the visual aura was recalcitrant, only improving with oral divalproex sodium treatment. CONCLUSION:As our patient experienced HC, which evolved from episodic migraine, we hypothesize that migraine and HC may share a common pathophysiology. However, the persistence of the visual aura, despite the abolition of pain and autonomic features with a therapeutic dose of indomethacin, and the subsequent successful treatment of the aura with divalproex sodium, suggest that aura and HC headache arise from distinct and dissociable mechanisms.

ABSTRACT Objective The evaluation of patients with headache relies heavily on the history. This article reviews key questions for diagnosing primary and secondary headache disorders with a rationale for each and phrasing to optimize the information obtained and the patient’s experience. Latest Developments The availability of online resources for clinicians and patients continues to increase, including sites that use artificial intelligence to generate a diagnosis and report based on patient responses online. Patient-friendly headache apps include calendars that help track treatment response, identify triggers, and provide educational information. Essential Points A structured approach to taking the history, incorporating online resources and other technologies when needed, facilitates making an accurate diagnosis and often eliminates the need for unnecessary testing. A detailed yet empathetic approach incorporating interpersonal skills enhances relationship building and trust, both of which are integral to successful treatment.

The pseudotumor cerebri syndrome may be idiopathic or arise from a secondary cause. The major morbidity is visual loss, which may be severe and permanent. This article reviews the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of patients with pseudotumor cerebri syndrome in adults and children.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Atogepant is an oral, calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. We evaluated the efficacy of atogepant for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine (CM) in participants with and without acute medication overuse. METHODS:This subgroup analysis of the phase 3, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled PROGRESS trial evaluated adults with a ≥1-year history of CM, ≥15 monthly headache days (MHDs), and ≥8 monthly migraine days (MMDs) during the 4-week baseline period. Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks and were analyzed by acute medication overuse status (triptans/ergots for ≥10 days per month, simple analgesics for ≥15 days per month, or combinations of triptans/ergots/simple analgesics for ≥10 days per month). Outcomes included change from baseline in mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days; ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across 12 weeks; and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. RESULTS:Of 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) met baseline acute medication overuse criteria (placebo, n = 169 [68.7%]; atogepant 30 mg BID, n = 161 [63.6%]; atogepant 60 mg QD, n = 170 [66.4%]). The least squares mean difference (LSMD) (95% CI) from placebo in MMDs was -2.7 (-4.0 to -1.4) with atogepant 30 mg BID and -1.9 (-3.2 to -0.6) with atogepant 60 mg QD. Mean MHDs (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.0 to -1.5] and -2.1 [-3.3 to -0.8]) and mean acute medication use days (LSMD [95% CI] -2.8 [-4.1 to -1.6] and -2.6 [-3.9 to -1.3]) were reduced and a higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in MMDs (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.5 [1.5-4.0] and 2.3 [1.4-3.7]) with atogepant 30 mg BID and atogepant 60 mg QD. There was a 52.1%-61.9% reduction in the proportion of atogepant-treated participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria over 12 weeks. Atogepant improved PRO measures. Similar results were observed in the subgroup without acute medication overuse. DISCUSSION:Atogepant was effective in participants with CM, with and without acute medication overuse, as evidenced by reductions in mean MMDs, MHDs, and acute medication use days; reductions in the proportion of participants meeting acute medication overuse criteria; and improvements in PROs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03855137. Submitted: February 25, 2019; first patient enrolled: March 11, 2019. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03855137. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE:This study provides Class II evidence that atogepant reduces mean MMDs, MHDs, and monthly acute medication use days in adult patients with or without medication overuse.

Promethazine, a common antiemetic, can cause severe tissue injury with intravenous (IV) injection. Dihydroergotamine (DHE), commonly used for the acute treatment of migraine, can cause arterial vasoconstriction. We report a rare complication of brachial artery vasospasm in a patient receiving IV promethazine and DHE sequentially through the same midline IV catheter. A 40-year-old woman with history of migraine headaches and Raynaud phenomenon was admitted for treatment of status migrainosus with scheduled IV DHE infusions. While receiving the DHE infusions, IV promethazine was added to the patient's regimen to treat nausea. During an infusion of DHE, the patient developed acute pain near the catheter insertion site due to active extravasation of IV DHE. An arterial Doppler ultrasound demonstrated stenosis in the right brachial artery near the region of infusion. The patient ultimately required balloon angioplasty and intra-arterial injection of nitroglycerin to restore adequate blood flow. We hypothesize that caustic injury to the right brachial vein from IV promethazine predisposed the patient to the extravasation of DHE, which, in turn, caused adjacent brachial artery vasospasm. This case suggests the need for careful consideration, if not strict avoidance, of the use of concurrent IV promethazine and DHE.

To prevent or mitigate chronic illness burden, people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and their family caregivers need primary (generalist-level) palliative care from the time of diagnosis forward. We used qualitative methods to explore their preferences about a screening-and-triage model (“ Improving Life with CF ”) developed to standardize this care. We purposively sampled and interviewed 14 pwCF and caregivers from 5 Improving Life with CF study sites. Thematic analysis was guided by a priori codes using the National Consensus Project's Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care. Participants included 7 adults and 2 adolescents with CF (3 with advanced disease), 4 parents, 1 partner (7 women; 5 people of color). Few were familiar with palliative care. Illness burden was described in multiple domains, including physical (e.g., dyspnea, pain), psychological (e.g., anxiety), and social (e.g., family well-being; impact on work/school). Most preferred survey-based screening with care coordination by the CF team. Preferences for screening approaches varied. PwCF and caregivers experience illness burden and are receptive to a CF-team delivered primary palliative care screening-and-triage model with flexible processes.

Deborah I. Friedman, Rashmi B. Halker Singh, and Scott W. Powers declare no conflicts of interest.

Background International consensus statements on depression and anxiety in adolescents and adults with CF recommend assessment for comorbid substance misuse. However, at CF centers, the frequency and impact of substance misuse have not been well characterized, and best practices for prevention, identification, and evidence-based treatment have not been routinely implemented. Methods Medical records of 148 adults with CF over 3 years were reviewed to determine the prevalence of substance misuse (alcohol or opiates) and its relationship with clinical variables and healthcare utilization. Independent-sample t-test for continuous outcomes and chi-square test for binary outcomes were used to compare groups with and without substance misuse. Results Substance misuse was documented in 28 (19%) adults with CF, equally distributed between alcohol (n=13) and opiates (n=15). Adults with substance misuse were more likely to be male. The prevalence of diagnosed anxiety and depression did not differ significantly between groups, but those with substance misuse had more severe anxiety (GAD-7: 10.0±6.1 vs. 3.3±4.4; p<0.001) and depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: 10.4±6.5 vs. 4.0±4.8; p<0.001). Adults with substance misuse had higher annual rates of missed outpatient CF visits and inpatient hospitalizations, with hospital admissions of longer mean duration. Conclusions In adults with CF, substance misuse is common and is associated with adverse indicators of emotional and physical health and service utilization, suggesting that systematic approaches to addressing substance misuse in CF clinics should be considered. Prospective, longitudinal study is warranted to elucidate the complex relationships between depression, anxiety, substance misuse, and health outcomes in individuals with CF.

Introduction Acute medication overuse can be a risk factor for chronification. Atogepant is an oral, small-molecule, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist. Objectives To evaluate change from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMDs) and acute medication use among participants of the PROGRESS trial with and without acute medication overuse. Methods PROGRESS (NCT03855137) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in adults with CM. Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, atogepant 30 mg twice daily (BID), or atogepant 60 mg once daily (QD) for 12 weeks, and categorized by acute medication overuse at baseline. Results From 778 participants randomized to treatment, and 755 participants in the modified intent-to-treat population, 500 (66.2%) had acute medication overuse—placebo: n=169 (68.7%); atogepant 30 mg BID: n=161 (63.6%); atogepant 60 mg QD: n=170 (66.4%). A ≥50% reduction in mean MMDs across the 12-week treatment period was achieved by a greater proportion of acute medication overuse participants treated with atogepant 30 mg BID (44.7%) and atogepant 60 mg QD (41.8%) compared with placebo (24.9%). Conclusion Regardless of acute medication overuse at baseline, atogepant demonstrated efficacy and was associated with a greater reduction in acute medication use days in people with CM.

Background Little is known about the burden of illness experienced by people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) since the advent of CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies. Studies that characterize the nature of illness burden are needed to inform the development and implementation of palliative care programs that can serve this population and address quality of life concerns. Methods Adults with CF treated at five U.S. CF centers were surveyed to obtain baseline data for the Improving Life with CF primary palliative care implementation trial. Consenting patients completed the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), a multidimensional measure of unmet needs for palliative care. Sociodemographic and clinical information was also obtained. The associations among these variables were examined through bivariate and multivariable analyses. Results Among 256 adults, the most distressing symptoms included not feeling "at peace", communication difficulties with family/friends, anxiety over illness or its treatment, and a lack of energy. In the multivariable analyses, CFTR modulator use was associated with lower IPOS total and physical symptoms scores; female sex and increased hospitalizations were associated with higher scores. Increased age and history of distal intestinal obstructive syndrome were associated with higher IPOS physical symptoms scores. Conclusions These findings illuminate the nature of illness burden for pwCF in the era of CFTR modulator therapies. Although illness burden is positively affected by modulator therapy, there is a continuing need for palliative care to address physical, emotional, and spiritual distress, and the communication and practical needs experienced by adults with CF.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been the first-line choice for the acute treatment of migraine attacks for decades; however, the safety of a particular NSAID is related to its treatment dose, duration, and mechanism of action. Although adverse event (AE) risks differ substantially among individual migraine treatments, increased or prolonged exposure to any NSAID elevates risks and severity of AEs. For this narrative review, we conducted a literature search of PubMed until July 2022, focusing on the history, mechanism of action, and treatment guidelines informing the safety and efficacy of celecoxib oral solution for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Here we discuss the mechanisms of action of nonselective NSAIDs vs. cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, and how these mechanisms underlie the AEs associated with these treatments. We review the clinical trials that influenced the regulatory history of NSAIDs, specifically COX-2 inhibitors, the role of traditional and new formulations of NSAIDs including celecoxib oral solution, and special considerations in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. Low-dose formulations of NSAIDs, such as celecoxib oral solution, provide acute migraine analgesia with similar or fewer associated cardiovascular and gastrointestinal events than previous formulations.

Treatment target goals for patients receiving preventive migraine treatment are complicated to assess and not achieved by most patients. A headache “number” could establish an understandable treatment target goal for patients with chronic migraine (CM). This study investigates the clinical impact of reduced headache frequency to ≤ 4 monthly headache days (MHDs) as a treatment-related migraine prevention target goal. All treatment arms were pooled for analysis from the PROMISE-2 trial evaluating eptinezumab for the preventive treatment of CM. Patients (N = 1072) received eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo. Data for the 6-item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), and acute medication use days were combined for all post-baseline assessments and analyzed by MHD frequency (≤ 4, 5–9, 10–15, > 15) in the 4 weeks preceding assessment. Based on pooled data, the percentage of patient-months with ≤ 4 MHDs associated with “very much improved” PGIC was 40.9 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02974153 ).