Background: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new inhaled glucocorticoid administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI).Objective: MF-DPI was evaluated for safety and efficacy and compared with placebo DPI and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma.Methods: Eligible patients (n = 227), 13 to 75 years of age, maintained on inhaled glucocorticoids before entering the trial, were randomized to receive: MF-DPI, 100 mug, twice daily, MF-DPI, 200 mug, twice daily, BDP MDI, 168 mug, twice daily, or placebo in a 12-week, multicenter, double-blind study.Results: At endpoint, FEV1 (primary efficacy variable) significantly improved for all three active treatments compared with placebo (P < .01, all comparisons). The response to MF-DPI, 200 g, twice daily treatment was approximately twice as large as the response to MF-DPI, 100 mug twice daily or BDP MDI treatment, although the differences between these groups did not reach statistical significance. Secondary efficacy variables including PEFR, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, and albuterol use showed similar trends. The MF-DPI, 100 mug, twice daily and BDP MDI, 168 mug, twice daily treatment groups produced comparable results for all efficacy variables.Conclusions: MF-DPI, 100 mug and 200 mug, twice daily were well-tolerated and significantly improved lung function and symptom control in the treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma. In this study, MF-DPI, 200 mug, twice daily seemed to be the most effective dosage.

BACKGROUND:Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new potent corticosteroid for use in treating asthma. OBJECTIVE:To test the lower range of the dose-response curve, effects of MF delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) on AMP-induced bronchoconstriction were compared with those of placebo. METHODS:In a placebo-controlled, 3-phase cross-over, single-center, double-blind study, 15 patients with mild asthma were randomized to three 2-week treatment phases (separated by 4-week washout phases) with MF DPI 50 microg twice daily, MF DPI 100 microg twice daily, or placebo. AMP challenge was performed before and at the end of each treatment phase. RESULTS:Thirteen patients completed all 3 phases and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Treatment with MF DPI 50 microg twice daily or with MF DPI 100 microg twice daily significantly reduced the bronchoconstrictor response to AMP, displacing the dose-response curve to the right by 2.81 and 3.11 doubling dilutions, respectively, compared with placebo (P <.001). The improvement in FEV(1) over the 2-week treatment phase was significantly (P < or =.033) greater during treatment with MF DPI 50 microg or 100 microg twice daily than with placebo. Peak expiratory flow rate, wheezing scores, difficulty breathing scores, nocturnal awakenings requiring salbutamol, and puffs of salbutamol per day also indicated a greater improvement in respiratory function and symptoms of asthma with MF DPI 50 or 100 microg twice daily than with placebo. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Treatment with low doses of MF DPI decreased airway responsiveness to AMP challenge and improved secondary measures of pulmonary function and asthma symptoms.

BACKGROUND Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in severe persistent asthma has been shown to reduce or eliminate oral corticosteroid (OCS) use while retaining effective asthma control. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the ability of mometasone furoate (MF) delivered by means of dry powder inhaler to reduce daily oral prednisone requirements in OCS-dependent patients with severe persistent asthma. METHODS We performed a 12-week, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial (21 centers, 132 patients) comparing 2 doses of MF (400 and 800 microg administered twice daily) with placebo, followed by a 9-month open-label phase in which 128 patients received treatment with MF. RESULTS At the endpoint of the double-blind trial, MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily reduced daily OCS requirements by 46.0% and 23.9%, respectively, whereas placebo increased OCS requirements by 164.4% (P <.01). Oral steroids were eliminated in 40%, 37%, and 0% of patients in the MF 400 and 800 mg twice daily and placebo groups, respectively. Pulmonary function and quality of life significantly increased for MF-treated patients. Further reductions in OCS requirements were achieved with long-term MF treatment in the open-label phase. CONCLUSION MF inhaled orally as a dry powder is an effective alternative to systemic corticosteroids in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Patients' airflow during inhalation is a key determinant of DPI performance; therefore we assessed airflow profiles and inhaler technique at two separate visits to the clinic among 17 adults involved in a 12week, placebo-controlled study of MF-DPI in the treatment of mild and moderate asthma.We used a functional model of the MF-DPI connected to a microprocessor that measures inspiratory flow rate (IFR), IFR rise time (the rapidity of inhalation), and duration of inspiration.One configuration, the MF-DPI trainer, was used to teach and reinforce proper inhaler technique by providing feedback to the patient by means of colored lights indicating IFRs and rise times relative to optimal levels.Airflow data were formally recorded using the MF-DPI trainer attached to a laptop computer.The first set of airflow profiles was obtained at the baseline visit.at which time all patients achieved IFRs 260 Umin and rise times ~300 msec.A second set of profiles was obtained at the study endpoint, and the same results were achieved (see Figure ), with the exception of one patient whose rise time was ~300 msec.Based on in vitro studies, the MF-DPI requires IFRs of at least 20 Umin and rise times ~300 msec to deliver a precise dose of MF relative to claimed delivery, and that IFRs of approximately 60 Umin provide optimal distribution of respirable particles.Therefore, we conclude that all but one patient in the present study generated airflow profiles sufficient to deliver precise doses of medication with the MF-DPI, and that proper inhaler technique was maintained over time.

BACKGROUND:Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance. OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. METHODS:This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable. RESULTS:At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND Despite current recommendations, many patients with persistent asthma are still treated with bronchodilators alone. OBJECTIVE The safety and efficacy of two once daily dosing regimens (200 microg and 400 microg) of mometasone furoate (MF) administered in the morning by using a dry-powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with those of a twice daily dosing regimen (200 microg administered twice daily) in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. METHODS All patients (306 patients; age range, 12-70 years) were given a diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months before enrollment in this 12-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study. The primary efficacy variable was change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint (last evaluable visit). RESULTS At endpoint, FEV(1) was significantly improved (P < or =.02) after MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment and MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment (16.0% and 16.1%, respectively) compared with placebo (5.5%). The improvement seen with MF-DPI 200 microg once daily morning treatment (10.4%) was not significantly different from that with placebo. Secondary efficacy variables also showed significant improvement for the MF-DPI 400 microg once daily morning treatment group and the MF-DPI 200 microg twice daily treatment group compared with the placebo group. All doses of MF administered by means of a DPI were well tolerated. CONCLUSION This is the first study to demonstrate that a total daily dose of 400 microg of MF administered by means of a DPI is an effective treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma previously taking only inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonists. This treatment was equally effective when administered either as a once daily or twice daily regimen.

A new formulation of mometasone furoate (MF) for administration by dry powder inhaler (DPI) was evaluated for the treatment of asthma. A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study compared the efficacy and safety of three doses of MF DPI (100, 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d) with beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 168 mcg b.i.d. administered by metered dose inhaler in 365 adult or adolescent patients being treated with inhaled glucocorticoids. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) was the primary efficacy variable. Secondary efficacy variables included other objective measures of pulmonary function [forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow 25-75% (FEV25-75%.) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR)] as well as subjective measures of therapeutic response (patients' daily evaluation of asthma symptoms and physicians' evaluation). At endpoint, all four active treatments were significantly more effective than placebo (P < 0.01) in improving FEV1 (MF DPI 5 to 7%, BDP 3%, placebo -6.6%) and all other measures of pulmonary function (FVC: MF DPI 4 to 5%, BDP 2%, placebo -4.7%; FEF25-75%: MF DPI 6 to 18%, BDP 7.5%, placebo -9.5%; PEFR (AM): MF DPI 5 to 10%, BDP 5.7%, placebo -7%). A consistent trend was observed for better improvement in patients treated with MF DPI 200 mcg b.i.d. than with MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d., with no apparent additional benefit of MF DPI 400 mcg b.i.d. Results for the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. and BDP 168 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups were similar. Patients' and physicians' subjective evaluations of symptoms found similar improvement in the MF DPI 200 and 400 mcg b.i.d. treatment groups, which were slightly better than that in the MF DPI 100 mcg b.i.d. group. Symptoms tended to worsen in the placebo group. MF DPI was well tolerated at all dose levels and the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse effects were headache, pharyngitis and oral candidiasis. No evidence of HPA-axis suppression was detected in any treatment group. In summary, all doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function and MF DPI 400 mcg (200 mcg b.i.d.) was the optimal dose in this study of patients with moderate persistent asthma.

Background: Albuterol sulfate, in the syrup and tablet form for oral administration, has been an effective treatment for adults and children with bronchial asthma. Extended-release albuterol sulfate tablets (Proventil Repetabs, Schering Corp.) provide a convenient, twice-daily dosing regimen, but are indicated only for patients greater than or equal to 12 years of age.Objective: This study was undertaken to determine whether patients 6 to 12 years of age could be effectively and safely treated with extended-release albuterol tablets.Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of 157 patients in five centers. Patients were randomized to 4 weeks' treatment with extended-release albuterol tablets, 4 mg twice daily (q 12h), increasing up to 12 mg q 12h, or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (PFTs), physician and patient evaluations, and data collected from patients' diaries on PEFR, asthma symptoms, number of nighttime awakenings, and number of tablets taken. The primary efficacy parameter was area under the curve (AUG) for FEV(1), evaluated for 8 to 12 hours post-dosing. Safety was evaluated based on vital signs, electrocardiograms, and adverse events.Results: Mean AUCs for FEV(1) were significantly greater in the albuterol group at days 1 and 8 (P less than or equal to .03). The albuterol group showed consistently lower severity scores for asthma symptoms. Physicians' and patients' global evaluations favored the albuterol group over the placebo group. No serious, treatment-related adverse events were reported. There were no clinically meaningful changes from baseline in either treatment group for vital signs or electrocardiograms.Conclusions: Extended-release albuterol tablets (4 mg), administered to children 6 to 12 years old in divided doses of up to 24 mg/day, improved pulmonary function and asthmatic symptoms and were well tolerated.

BACKGROUND:The use of intranasally administered corticosteroid sprays is an established treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis.METHODS:In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 438 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated for 4 weeks with double-strength beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aqueous nasal spray (84 micrograms/spray: BDP-ds), once daily; regular-strength BDP (42 micrograms/spray: BDP-rs), twice daily; high-strength BDP (336 micrograms/spray: BDP-hs), once daily; or placebo. BDP-hs was included as a safety comparison group. All treatments were given as two sprays per nostril.RESULTS:Physician-rated nasal symptom scores were significantly improved in all three active treatment groups compared with those of the placebo group within the initial 3 days of treatment. Improvement was maintained throughout the 4-week treatment period. BDP-ds and BDP-rs were equivalent at all time points. The BDP-ds, BDP-rs, and BDP-hs groups had greater numbers of patients with a good or excellent therapeutic response at end point than the placebo group. All treatments were well-tolerated, and no unexpected adverse events were reported. No effects on laboratory evaluations or vital signs were evident for any treatment group.CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study show that BDP-ds given once a day and BDP-rs given twice a day in the same total daily dose are comparably safe and effective in the treatment of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Background: The treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often requires the use of a decongestant to improve nasal congestion, along with an antihistamine to adequately control other nasal, as well as nonnasal symptoms. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 874 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with one of the following: SCH 434 QD (a combination of 10 mg of loratadine in the coating and 240 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate in an extended-release core) once daily, 10 mg of loratadine once daily, 120 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate every 12 hours, or placebo for 2 weeks. Results: SCH 434 QD was consistently superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Composite symptom scores (total, total nasal, and total nonnasal) were reduced significantly in patients treated with SCH 434 QD as compared with placebo (p < 0.01). When compared with its individual components, reductions in mean symptom scores were consistently greater, numerically, in patients treated with SCH 434 QD than in patients who were treated with either loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone. SCH 434 QD was superior to pseudoephedrine in reducing nonnasal symptoms at all time points (p < 0.01), and superior to loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness at end point (p < 0.01). In the physicians' evaluation of therapeutic response, the SCH 434 QD group had the greatest number of patients with a good or excellent response at end point (58%). All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events. Insomnia and nervousness, adverse events commonly associated with pseudoephedrine, were noted in a significantly greater number of patients treated with SCH 434 QD or pseudoephedrine (p ≤ 0.04) as compared with those treated with loratadine or placebo. Conclusions: The results of the study demonstrate that SCH 434 QD is more effective than placebo or either of its components alone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. (J ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL 1995;96:139-47.)