PDF file - 797K, Figure S1. Barrier phenotype of human brain microvascular endothelial cells and astrocytes in monocultures and co-cultures. Figure S2. alpha/beta-crystallin does not affect cell viability of TNBC cells in standard monolayer culture. Figure S3. alpha/beta-crystallin overexpression increases liver metastases in an orthotopic model of TNBC. Figure S4. Silencing alpha/beta-crystallin inhibits liver metastases in an orthotopic model of TNBC. Figure S5. alpha/beta-crystallin does not affect proliferation or apoptosis in primary mammary tumors and brain metastatic lesions determined at autopsy. Table S1. Patient characteristics Table S2. alpha/beta-crystallin expression in paired tumors. Table S3. Association of alpha/beta-crystallin expression with breast cancer subtype. Table S4. Incidence of metastases in mice in orthotopic models of TNBC .

XLS file - 16K, Pulmonary and pleural effusions, pneumonitis.

Individual histograms of perforin expression by memory CD8 T cell cluster pre- and post-vaccination

<p>CYTOF Panel</p>

<p>Concurrent HER2 therapies for each patient for whom CYTOF analysis was done</p>

Background Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated efficacy in treating solid tumors with Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), the inability to repair DNA double-stranded breaks through the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Specific genetic and epigenetic alterations result in defective HRR function. Bi-allelic loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 principally drives HRR deficiency. While BRCA1/2 are instrumental to HRR, multiple genes, including PALB2, impact the HRR pathway. PALB2 mutations occur in an estimated 0.97% to 3.66% of solid tumors [AACR GENIE PALB2] and are associated with susceptibility to various cancers. No clinically approved therapies specifically targeting PALB2 currently exist. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with germline or somatic PALB2 mutations may benefit from PARPi treatment, which has potential to be a new tumor agnostic therapy option across a wide range of solid tumors. Methods PAVO is a pan-tumor, single-arm, multicenter Phase-II study assessing the safety and efficacy of niraparib (a PARPi) in patients who harbor a confirmed PALB2 mutation. The study plans to enroll up to 110 adult subjects. Eligible participants must have: locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor(s); confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic somatic or germline PALB2 mutation; received all standard of care (SOC) therapy for their tumor type, or are unlikely to derive benefit from SOC therapy in the opinion of the treating physician; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks with adequate organ/bone marrow function. Exclusion criteria include a confirmed somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation, prior treatment with any PARPi, ovarian or prostate cancer, or rapid progression while on platinum-based therapy in the metastatic setting. Niraparib will be administered in 28 day cycles with daily dosing, as outlined in the protocol. Participants will continue study treatment until documented radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or consent withdrawal. The primary study endpoint is objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of participants who have partial or complete response to therapy as assessed by Independent Central Review. Secondary endpoints include DOR, PFS, and CBR. PAVO is sponsored by Tempus with support from GSK (GlaxoSmithKline). The trial opened in March 2022. Tempus molecular data tracking (integrated NGS and EMR data) and the TIME Trial program (rapid match of patients to Just in TIME sites for clinical trials), enable patient identification and prescreening. Enrollment occurs through a combination of TIME and prospective clinical sites, where individualized prescreening models are in development. New site identification and referral of molecularly eligible patients to enrolling centers are ongoing. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT05169437 Citation Format: Tian Zhang, Thomas Weart, Matthias Weiss, Drew Murray, Minaxi Jhawer, Edward Huynh, Shumei Kato, Amy Cummings, Lydia Usha, Arvinder Bhinder, Rajiv Desai, Brad Johnson, Anjali Avadhani, Cecile Rose T. Vibat, Lauren Lopez, Brynna Driscoll, Annajane Ward, Christie K. Rice, Blathnaid Donovan, Scott Sherrin, Mykel Robble, Stephanie O'Leary, Kimberly Blackwell, Amine Aziez, Stephanie Petrone, Kathleen Harnden, Kimberly Strickland, Sonya Reid, Mark Robson, Andrew S. Paulson, Afshin Dowlati. PAVO: A phase-II, open label, single arm study of niraparib in patients with locally advanced/metastatic PALB2 mutated tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT055.

Supplementary Figure 2 - PDF file 275K, Supplementary Figure 2A-D. Changes in hormone levels over time per patient; responders (stable disease >6 months) highlighted in red

Mutation of HER2 to obscure binding of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab

Supplementary Figures S1, S2, S3 and Tables S1, S2

<p>Mutation of HER2 to obscure binding of Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab</p>

Abstract Background Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have demonstrated efficacy in treating solid tumors with Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), the inability to repair DNA double-stranded breaks through the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway. Specific genetic and epigenetic alterations result in defective HRR function. Bi-allelic loss of BRCA1 or BRCA2 principally drives HRR deficiency. While BRCA1/2 are instrumental to HRR, multiple genes, including PALB2, impact the HRR pathway. PALB2 mutations occur in an estimated 0.97% to 3.66% of solid tumors [AACR GENIE PALB2] and are associated with susceptibility to various cancers. No clinically approved therapies specifically targeting PALB2 currently exist. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with germline or somatic PALB2 mutations may benefit from PARPi treatment, which has potential to be a new tumor agnostic therapy option across a wide range of solid tumors. Methods PAVO is a pan-tumor, single-arm, multicenter Phase-II study assessing the safety and efficacy of niraparib (a PARPi) in patients who harbor a confirmed PALB2 mutation. The study plans to enroll up to 110 adult subjects. Eligible participants must have: locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor(s); confirmed pathogenic or likely pathogenic somatic or germline PALB2 mutation; received all standard of care (SOC) therapy for their tumor type, or are unlikely to derive benefit from SOC therapy in the opinion of the treating physician; ECOG performance status of 0 or 1; life expectancy of ≥ 12 weeks with adequate organ/bone marrow function. Exclusion criteria include a confirmed somatic or germline BRCA1/2 mutation, prior treatment with any PARPi, ovarian or prostate cancer, or rapid progression while on platinum-based therapy in the metastatic setting. Niraparib will be administered in 28 day cycles with daily dosing, as outlined in the protocol. Participants will continue study treatment until documented radiographic progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or consent withdrawal. The primary study endpoint is objective response rate (ORR), defined as the proportion of participants who have partial or complete response to therapy as assessed by Independent Central Review. Secondary endpoints include DOR, PFS, and CBR. PAVO is sponsored by Tempus with support from GSK (GlaxoSmithKline). The trial opened in March 2022. Tempus molecular data tracking (integrated NGS and EMR data) and the TIME Trial program (rapid match of patients to Just in TIME sites for clinical trials), enable patient identification and prescreening. Enrollment occurs through a combination of TIME and prospective clinical sites, where individualized prescreening models are in development. New site identification and referral of molecularly eligible patients to enrolling centers are ongoing. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT05169437 Citation Format: Tian Zhang, Thomas Weart, Matthias Weiss, Drew Murray, Minaxi Jhawer, Edward Huynh, Shumei Kato, Amy Cummings, Lydia Usha, Arvinder Bhinder, Rajiv Desai, Brad Johnson, Anjali Avadhani, Cecile Rose T. Vibat, Lauren Lopez, Brynna Driscoll, Annajane Ward, Christie K. Rice, Blathnaid Donovan, Scott Sherrin, Mykel Robble, Stephanie O'Leary, Kimberly Blackwell, Amine Aziez, Stephanie Petrone, Kathleen Harnden, Kimberly Strickland, Sonya Reid, Mark Robson, Andrew S. Paulson, Afshin Dowlati. PAVO: A phase-II, open label, single arm study of niraparib in patients with locally advanced/metastatic PALB2 mutated tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT055.

<p>Individual histograms of perforin expression by memory CD8 T cell cluster pre- and post-vaccination</p>

SPADE tree generated by CYTOF analysis

Supplementary Table 1 - PDF file 4K, Supplementary Table 1. Median hormone levels at baseline, start of cycle 2 (C2), and end of study (EOS) and the percent change in levels from baseline to C2 and C2 to EOS

IMPORTANCE Germline testing guidelines are suggested for specific disease types or a family history of cancer, yet alterations are found in cancer types in which germline testing is not routinely indicated. The clinical role of identifying germline variants in these populations is valuable to patients and their at-risk relatives. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the prevalence of germline findings in patients undergoing tumor/normal matched sequencing among cancer types lacking guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cross-sectional study took place on August 18, 2021, and included data from deidentified records of patients tested, using the Tempus x T tumor/normal matched approach from November 2017 to August 2021. Records included in this study were from 34 642 patients treated in geographically diverse oncology practices in the US with a diagnosis of any of the following cancers: bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, head and neck, breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The rate of germline findings (ie, single-nucleotide variants and small insertions or deletions) detected in 50 reportable hereditary cancer genes was calculated for cancer types lacking guidelines for germline testing (bladder, brain, lung, esophagus, cholangiocarcinoma, and head and neck) and cancer types for which germline testing is frequently performed (breast, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, endometrial, and colorectal). Same-gene second somatic hits were assessed to provide a comprehensive assessment on genomic drivers. RESULTS Of 34 642 patients, 18 888 were female (54.5%); of 27 498 patients whose age at diagnosis was known, mean (SD) age was 62.23 (3.36) years. A total of 2534 of 34 642 patients (7.3%) harbored pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. Within the tumor types lacking testing guidelines, germline mutations were at 6.6% (79/1188) in bladder cancer and 5.8% (448/7668) in lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This study may present the largest retrospective analysis to date of deidentified real-world data from patients diagnosed with advanced cancer with tumor/normal matched sequencing data and the prevalence of pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in cancer types lacking hereditary cancer testing guidelines. The findings suggest there may be clinical implications for patients and their at-risk family members in cancers for which germline assessment primarily based on the cancer diagnosis is rarely obtained.

Background: Actionable genomic alterations can be identified through either a biopsy of solid tissue or the detection of circulating tumor DNA from plasma. Little is known about the concordance rates of pathogenic variants between cell free DNA (cfDNA) and solid biopsies, including how concordance varies over time, by cancer type, or by treatment. Here we examine the concordance of pathogenic variants identified in solid tissue biopsies to patient-matched cfDNA biopsies in one of the largest pan-cancer datasets. Methods: De-identified records of cfDNA (xF) and solid (xT) biopsies were analyzed in 2418 stage 4 patients across 5 cancer types: breast (N=459), colon (N= 564), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (N=750), pancreatic (N=353) and prostate (N=292). Patients were required to have ≥1 pathogenic variant detected in the solid biopsy and a cfDNA biopsy occurring on the same day or after the solid biopsy. Pathogenic SNVs and indels within overlapping probe regions of xF and xT meeting assay limits of detection were included for analysis. Only one cfDNA and solid biopsy were analyzed per patient. Results: Overall, the total number of pathogenic variants identified in solid tissue and cfDNA were highly similar within each cancer type (breast 881 vs 831; colon 1983 vs 1673; NSCLC 1672 vs 1470; pancreas 873 vs 703; prostate 480 vs 384; solid biopsy vs. cfDNA, respectively). Subsetting to patients with ≥1 pathogenic variant in both assays (77%), >40% of patients had additional pathogenic variants identified in their cfDNA which were not found in their solid tissue profiling. Of these subsetted patients which also had cfDNA collected >1 year after their solid biopsy, >25% of NSCLC and >20% of breast cancer patients had mutually exclusive variants (all solid tissue variants were undetectable while new pathogenic variants were found in cfDNA). When comparing samples taken between one week and over one year from each other, the percentage of solid tissue variants identified in cfDNA decreased in a time dependent manner (breast 73% vs. 48%; colon 76% vs. 55%; NSCLC 75% vs. 43%; pancreas 76% vs. 36%; prostate 72% vs. 42%; ≤1 week vs. >1 year, respectively). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest dataset of matched solid and cfDNA biopsies. >40% of patients with ≥1 pathogenic variants in both assays had additional pathogenic variants found only in their cfDNA. Further, cfDNA was capable of identifying the majority (>70%) of solid tissue variants when samples were taken within one week of each other, though this concordance decreased with time. This data strongly supports the use of matched solid and cfDNA testing, and further exploration of the clinical utility of cfDNA to identify pathogenic variants over the course of a patient’s disease. We will continue to acquire more data and results will be updated before presentation. Citation Format: Matthew MacKay, Joshua Drews, Bonnie V. Dougherty, Duane Hassane, Chris Mason, Gaurav Khullar, Calvin Chao, Joel Dudley, Kimberly L. Blackwell, Nike T. Beaubier, Justin Guinney. Temporal concordance rates of pathogenic variants in liquid biopsies taken after solid tissue NGS profiling in a real-world pan-cancer cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 62.

CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with antiestrogens have revolutionized the treatment of ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC), significantly prolonging survival. However, this combination is not curative, and tumors eventually acquire resistance. Following progression on this combination, patients are left with limited treatment options. A diverse array of mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6i + antiestrogens have been described. However, laboratory models that capture this heterogeneity of resistance mechanisms are lacking. Patient-derived organoids (PDOs) provide a rapid, robust and reliable platform that recapitulates intra-tumor heterogeneity, partially mimics the cancer microenvironment, and accurately predicts drug response. We aspired to generate a platform of CDK4/6i-resistant breast cancer PDOs to serve as models for understanding acquired resistance to CDK4/6i + antiestrogens and identifying therapies to overcome resistance. We successfully established 16 PDOs out of 32 biopsies (50% efficiency) of metastates from patients with ER+ MBC progressing on CDK4/6i (palbociclib or abemaciclib) + antiestrogens (letrozole or fulvestrant; median response to combination = 9 months). Our collection includes PDOs derived from lobular (n=3) and inflammatory (n=2) breast cancers and reflects racial/ethnic diversity (50% white/not Hispanic; 18.8% Hispanic; 12.5% Black; 12.5% other/unknown). Next-gen sequencing reports were available for 10 patients from which organoids were established, revealing alterations associated with CDK4/6i and/or antiestrogen resistance, including ESR1 (n=2), HER2/ERBB2 (n=2), PTEN (n=2), CCNE1 (n=1), NF1 (n=1), and ARID1A (n=1). Furthermore, one biopsy and its derived organoid lost ER expression, and 5 harbored PIK3CA activating mutations. Thus far, we have performed targeted DNA-sequencing on 7 PDOs and found 13/15 (86.7%) concordance with driver mutations from tumor NGS reports. PDOs established from CDK4/6i-resistant biopsies maintained resistance to palbociclib or abemaciclib ± fulvestrant (500 nM each) in 3D cell viability assays (6 days of treatment). In contrast, control PDOs established from primary ER+ breast cancer surgical samples (n=2) were sensitive to each CDK4/6i ± fulvestrant (median viability for combination=25.6-31.5% for control vs 65.2-80.5% for resistant). GSEA analysis of RNA-seq data from control (n=2) and CDK4/6i-resistant (n=6) PDOs cultured in estrogen-depleted media ± 200 nM palbociclib revealed that palbociclib treatment resulted in downregulation of E2F target and G2M checkpoint signatures in control but not resistant PDOs. Next, we performed a high-throughput screen of 1,000 compounds in 3 resistant PDOs. One PDO showed exquisite sensitivity to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint components, including CDK1, PLK1, Aurora kinase, ATR, Chk1, and Wee1 inhibitors. Finally, treatment of 10 resistant PDOs with the CDK2/4/6 inhibitor PF-06873600 revealed that the CCNE1 (cyclin E1)-amplified PDO was highly sensitive (IC50=130 nM vs >1000 nM), supporting that CCNE1-amplified tumors are vulnerable to CDK2 inhibition. Conclusions: PDOs can be successfully established from ER+ MBC biopsies, maintain the resistant phenotype in culture, retain driver alterations found in tumors from which they were derived, and fail to suppress E2F targets following treatment with CDK4/6i. Therefore, these PDOs represent valuable models to understand and explore diverse mechanisms of CDK4/6i resistance and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Citation Format: Ariella B. Hanker, Sumanta Chatterjee, Yunguan Wang, Dan Ye, Dhivya R. Sudhan, Brian M. Larsen, Lauren C. Smith, Yilin Zhang, Vishal Kandagatla, Kuntal Majmudar, Ezequiel Renzulli, Saurabh Mendiratta, Kimberly Blackwell, Alana L. Welm, Sunati Sahoo, Nisha Unni, Cheryl M. Lewis, Tao Wang, Ameen A. Salahudeen, Carlos L. Arteaga. A platform of CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant patient-derived breast cancer organoids illuminates mechanisms of resistance and therapeutic vulnerabilities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-01.