ABSTRACT Five chimpanzees were immunized by administration of one or more intranasal priming doses of one to three recombinant adenoviruses containing a gp160 insert from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) MN (HIV-1 MN ) followed by one or more boosts of recombinant HIV-1 SF2 gp120 delivered intramuscularly with MF59 adjuvant. This regimen resulted in humoral immune responses in three of five animals. Humoral responses included immunochemically active anti-HIV-1 antibodies (Abs) directed to recombinant gp120 and neutralizing Abs reactive with T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1 MN and HIV-1 SF2 . In addition, neutralizing activity was detected to the two homologous primary isolates and to two of three heterologous primary isolates which, like the immunizing strains, can use CXCR4 as a coreceptor for infection. The three animals with detectable neutralizing Abs and a fourth exhibiting the best cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response were protected from a low-dose intravenous challenge with a cell-free HIV-1 SF2 primary isolate administered 4 weeks after the last boost. Animals were rested for 46 weeks and then rechallenged, without a boost, with an eightfold-higher challenge dose of HIV-1 SF2 . The three animals with persistent neutralizing Abs were again protected. These data show that a strong, long-lived protective Ab response can be induced with a prime-boost regimen in chimpanzees. The data suggest that in chimpanzees, the presence of neutralizing Abs correlates with protection for animals challenged intravenously with a high dose of a homologous strain of HIV-1, and they demonstrate for the first time the induction of neutralizing Abs to homologous and heterologous primary isolates.

The inability of antibodies induced by experimental human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccines to neutralize HIV-1 primary isolates may be due to a failure to elicit such antibodies, antigenic differences between the vaccine and the strains tested, insensitivity of the assays used, or to a combination of factors. New neutralization assays were used to determine the ability of candidate AIDS vaccines to generate neutralizing antibodies for clade B primary isolate BZ167, which is closely related in portions of its envelope to the immunizing strains. Sera from HIV-uninfected volunteers in vaccine trials were tested, and neutralizing activity was found in recipients of recombinant (r) gp120MN or of rgp160MN-containing canarypox boosted with rgp120SF-2. Detection of antibodies that neutralize primary isolate BZ167 correlated with neutralizing activity for homologous vaccine strains. These data demonstrate that certain candidate AIDS vaccines can elicit antibodies that neutralize a primary isolate of HIV-1.

In contrast to results obtained with plasmid DNA vectors encoding antigens from viruses such as influenza and hepatitis B, plasmids coding for antigens from private immunodeficiency, viruses have elicited relatively weak antibody responses following gene gun-mediated DNA immunization of rhesus monkeys. In an effort to augment these responses, the importance of the immunization schedule was investigated, as well as the possible synergy that might result from boosting gene gun-primed animals with other routes of immunization. Here we demonstrate that endpoint gp120-specific antibody titers can be enhanced as much as tenfold by reducing the number of immunizations and lengthening the resting period between immunizations. In addition, boosting gene gun-primed animals with either recombinant subunits or gp120-expressing vaccinia recombinants resulted in synergistic responses. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.

OBJECTIVE:To characterize a purified panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to epitopes in HIV-1 envelope V3, CD4-binding region, C4 and gp41.DESIGN:Neutralization and/or binding activity data were obtained from 21 laboratories on a coded panel consisting of seven human MAb, seven mouse MAb, recombinant human CD4 immunoadhesin [CD4-immunoglobulin G (IgG)], normal human and normal murine Ig.METHODS:Laboratories performed a variety of neutralization assays and antigen binding assays with HIVIIIB, HIVMN and other laboratory strains of HIV-1.RESULTS:For a single MAb, there was up to a 10(3) range of neutralizing antibody titers between laboratories. The range in titers appeared to depend on the sensitivity of the neutralization assay. Two methods were used to consolidate the data from all laboratories, the geometric mean titer (GMT) and the median neutralizing titer (MNT). The panel of MAb were also analyzed by a variety of assays that measure binding activity to native or denatured epitopes. The relative binding activity of the MAb did not appear to correlate with neutralizing activity.CONCLUSION:Neutralization results from any single laboratory did not correlate with the collective data. The relative potency (rank order) of the MAb in the panel were equivalent when determined by GMT or MNT. These values may be useful to individual laboratories for estimating the sensitivity of their neutralization assays. The study also identified potential reference reagents with which neutralizing activity could be compared.