PURPOSE:To compare the number of pulmonary nodules detected at helical low- and standard-dose computed tomography (CT) and to investigate the diagnostic value of low-dose CT with a radiation exposure equivalent to that used at chest radiography.MATERIALS AND METHODS:Two radiologists recorded pulmonary nodules at standard-dose (250 or 100 mA, pitch of 1; 200 mA, pitch of 2) or low-dose CT (50 or 25 mA, pitch of 1 or 2) in five postmortem specimens and 75 patients. Nodules were assessed by size (5 mm or smaller, 6-10 mm, or larger than 10 mm) and by diagnostic confidence ("definite nodule," "definite lesion, not classic nodule," or "questionable lesion, possibly representing a vessel") with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Artifacts depicted at low-dose CT were recorded.RESULTS:There were no statistically significant differences in the number of nodules detected at standard- or low-dose CT except in nodules 5 mm or smaller that were assessed as definite nodules at standard- or low-dose CT (25 mA, pitch of 2) (472 vs 397, P < .05). Artifacts that possibly interfered with nodule detection were observed exclusively at CT with 25 mA and a pitch of 2.CONCLUSION:Pulmonary nodules were detected reliably at CT with 50 mA and pitch of 2 or with 25 mA and a pitch of 1. However, further reduction of the dose to that used at chest radiography was associated with a significant decrease in the number of nodules 5 mm or smaller that were detected, possibly due to artifacts.

Computed tomography is a significant source of medical radiation exposure for populations in Europe. Reduced radiation exposure may be possible with modern CT scanners with an image quality that while less good than before remains acceptable for clinical purposes. The lung appears particularly well suited to investigation with low-dose CT owing to the high contrast between normal and diseased pulmonary parenchyma.We analysed the diagnostic accuracy of different low-dose CT protocols for the detection of pulmonary nodules using inflation-fixed isolated postmortem lung specimens in a chest phantom. In a comparative patient study diagnostic accuracies of standard-dose CT (120 kV, 250 mAs; slice thickness 10 mm, pitch 1) and low-dose CT (120 or 140 kV, 50 mAs; slice thickness 5 or 10 mm, pitch 1 or 2) were assessed.Preliminary results suggest that low-dose CT protocols with radiation exposure of 10-20% of that with standard-dose CT an reliably depict soft tissue density pulmonary nodules with a diameter of more than 5 mm and can also demonstrate smaller nodules equally well is many cases.Low-dose CT may frequently be an adequate imaging procedure in a given clinical setting, particularly in young patients with benign disease.

Die Computertomographie (CT) trägt wesentlich zur medizinischen Strahlenexposition der Bevölkerung bei. Eine Reduktion dieser Strahlenexposition läßt sich vermutlich mit modernen CT-Geräten bei für viele Fragestellungen vertretbaren Einschränkungen der Bildqualität realisieren. Zur Untersuchung mittels solcher Niedrigdosis-CT (NDCT) erscheint die Lunge aufgrund der günstigen Kontrastverhältnisse des normalen und pathologischen Parenchyms besonders geeignet. Wir untersuchten die Treffsicherheit unterschiedlicher NDCT-Protokolle im Nachweis pulmonaler Rundherde an Lungenpräparaten in einem Thoraxphantom. In einer vergleichenden Patientenstudie wurde die Treffsicherheit der Spiral-CT des Thorax mit etablierten Parametern (120 kV, 250 mAs, Schichtdicke 10 mm, Pitch 1) mit derjenigen verschiedener NDCT-Protokolle (120 oder 140 kV, 50 mAs, Schichtdicke 5 oder 10 mm, Pitch 1 oder 2) verglichen. Vorläufige Ergebnisse zeigen, daß diese NDCT-Protokolle mit einer Dosis von 10 bis 20 % der Standard-Dosis CT weichteildichte Lungenrundherde mit einem Durchmesser von mehr als 5 mm zuverlässig nachweisen konnten und auch bei kleineren Rundherden häufig gleichwertig waren. Abhängig von der Fragestellung sollten derartige NDCT-Protokolle v. a. bei jungen Individuen mit benignen Erkrankungen auch in der klinischen Routine eingesetzt werden.