BACKGROUND:Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pose a substantial threat to patients and health-care systems. We conducted a survey of carbapenem-resistant and/or colistin-resistant Enterobacterales (CCRE survey) in 37 European countries to describe their occurrence, geographical distribution, and population dynamics and inform control policies. We report the results of Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex isolates in this study. METHODS:In this cross-sectional, epidemiological, microbiological, and genomic study conducted in all EU, European Economic Area and EU candidate countries as of 2019, hospital microbiology laboratories were selected on the basis of population coverage. Participating laboratories collected, from patient samples, the first ten successive isolates of carbapenem-resistant or carbapenem-susceptible increased exposure (carbapenem-R/I) K pneumoniae species complex or Escherichia coli, and carbapenem-susceptible (carbapenem-S) comparator isolates of the same species, accompanied by patient epidemiological and clinical information. Isolate collection started in 2019, with three possible starting dates-ie, March 1, April 1, or May 1, 2019, and ended after collection of ten carbapenem-R/I and carbapenem-S isolates or a maximum period of 6 months. Isolates were tested for phenotypic susceptibility to 16 antimicrobial agents of relevance to K pneumoniae species complex. Whole-genome sequencing was performed centrally using Illumina technology. Isolates from the CCRE survey were compared with those from the European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) study. FINDINGS:1566 carbapenem-R/I and 1407 carbapenem-S K pneumoniae species complex isolates collected from patients in 302 hospitals in 36 countries (one country did not send isolates) were analysed in this study. The high-risk lineages identified during a previous similar survey in 2013-14 (EuSCAPE) were found to continue to circulate across European hospitals in 2019 (ST11, ST15, ST101, and ST258/512). Moreover, concerning shifts in the pathogen population were observed. First, a higher proportion of carbapenem-R/I isolates was found to carry a carbapenemase gene in the CCRE survey (1398 [89·3%] of 1566) than in EuSCAPE (657 [69·6%] of 944), mainly related to increased acquisition of carbapenemase genes by high-risk lineages. Of note, among ST307 isolates from all hospitals, the proportion of carbapenem-R/I isolates carrying a carbapenemase gene increased from 14 (60·9%) of 23 in EuSCAPE to 164 (91·1%) of 180 in the CCRE survey. Second, an expansion of emerging multidrug-resistant lineages (ST147, ST307, and ST39) was also noted: Among 113 hospitals that contributed K pneumoniae species complex isolates to both EuSCAPE and the CCRE survey, the proportion of ST147 increased from 16 (3·4%) of 476 in EuSCAPE to 49 (7·4%) of 662 carbapenem-R/I isolates in the CCRE survey, that of ST307 increased from 15 (3·2%) of 476 to 88 (13·3%) of 662, and that of ST39 increased from 3 (0·6%) of 476 to 10 (1·5%) of 662. Third, there was an increased spread of isolates harbouring acquired virulence loci: isolates with the highest Kleborate virulence score of five increased from 7 (0·4%) of 1717 in EuSCAPE to 40 (1·3%) of 2973 in the CCRE survey. Notably, the increase was mainly observed in the carbapenem-S-group. INTERPRETATION:The survey findings portray an escalating epidemiological situation and suggest that control measures have not been able to interrupt transmission of high-risk lineages of carbapenemase-producing K pneumoniae in European hospitals. The heterogeneous and evolving situation with regards to circulating lineages and dominant carbapenemase genes requires strengthening and continuous adaptation of diagnostic, treatment, and control measures guided by genomic surveillance. FUNDING:European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance.

BACKGROUND:The emergence of carbapenem resistance in Escherichia coli is of major concern due to the high propensity of spread of this species and scarce treatment options. Herein, we examined the occurrence and spread of carbapenem-resistant E coli based on the carbapenem-resistant and/or colistin-resistant Enterobacterales (CCRE) survey performed across European countries in 2019. METHODS:We analysed epidemiological, microbiological, and whole-genome sequencing data of 548 E coli isolates from individual patients from 156 hospitals in 32 European countries over 6 months in 2019. These hospitals collected the first ten successive isolates of carbapenem-resistant or carbapenem-susceptible increased exposure (carbapenem-R/I) Klebsiella pneumoniae species complex or E coli, and carbapenem-susceptible (carbapenem-S) comparator isolates of the same species. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for 19 antimicrobial agents. Whole-genome sequencing was performed centrally using Illumina technology. Isolates from the CCRE survey were compared with those from the European Survey of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (EuSCAPE) study. FINDINGS:Of the 548 E coli isolates, 211 (38·5%) were carbapenem-resistant or susceptible, increased exposure (carbapenem-R/I), and 337 (61·5%) were carbapenem-susceptible (carbapenem-S). Five sequence types (STs) accounted for 96 (45·5%) of 211 carbapenem-R/I isolates: ST131 (27), ST410 (20), ST38 (19), ST167 (16), and ST648 (14). Carbapenemase genes were identified in 182 (86·3%) carbapenem-R/I isolates, a pronounced increase from the 2013-14 EuSCAPE study (36 of 99, 36·4%). The most common genes were blaNDM-5 (62 of 182, 34·1%) and blaOXA-48 (40 of 182, 22·0%). blaNDM-5 carriage increased substantially compared with that in EuSCAPE (two of 99, 2·02%). Phylogenetic analysis showed substantial clonal spread of globally disseminated blaNDM-5-harbouring lineages, with numerous introductions into Europe but minimal onward transmission. INTERPRETATION:High-risk STs of E coli carrying carbapenemase genes are rapidly spreading globally, although our results indicate that, in 2019, most cases in Europe were sporadic. We urge vigilant monitoring, including genomic surveillance, and strengthening of control efforts, to reduce mortality and morbidity associated with the impending rise in carbapenem-R/I E coli cases. FUNDING:European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control and the Centre for Genomic Pathogen Surveillance.

OPINION article Front. Med., 20 March 2024Sec. Family Medicine and Primary Care Volume 11 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1365067

COVID-19 has been challenging to stop because the virus was new to humans and keeps changing in ways that make it spread faster and cause disease in many people, which is called an epidemic. Health authorities and doctors must hurry to decide which protection measures, like closing borders or developing vaccines, will work to fight each kind of harmful microbe depending on how dangerous and widespread it is. Fortunately, a new scientific technique called whole genome sequencing can quickly spot and track pathogens—microbes that cause infectious diseases. Whole genome sequencing works well for both disease-causing viruses and bacteria. This technique can help scientists discover new epidemics and reveal how diseases are spreading, aiding health authorities in their quest to stop epidemics much faster. As diseases around the world are being tracked using this method, we stand a better chance of limiting future epidemics like COVID-19.

This article advocates for mobilizing pathogen genomic surveillance to contain and mitigate health threats from infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), building upon successes achieved by large-scale genome sequencing analysis of SARS-CoV-2 variants in guiding COVID-19 monitoring and public health responses and adopting a One Health approach. Capabilities of laboratory-based surveillance and epidemic alert systems should be enhanced by fostering (i) universal access to real-time whole genome sequence (WGS) data of pathogens to inform clinical practice, infection control, public health policies, and vaccine and antimicrobial drug research and development; (ii) integration of diagnostic microbiology data, data from testing asymptomatic individuals, pathogen sequence data, clinical data, and epidemiological data into surveillance programs; (iii) stronger cross-sectorial collaborations between healthcare, public health, animal health, and environmental surveillance and research using One Health approaches, toward understanding the ecology and transmission pathways of pathogens and AMR across ecosystems; (iv) international collaboration and interconnection of surveillance networks, harmonization of laboratory methods, and standardization of surveillance methods for global reporting, including on pathogen genomic variant or strain nomenclature; (v) responsible data sharing between surveillance networks, databases, and platforms according to FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) principles; and (vi) research on genomic surveillance system implementation and its cost-effectiveness for different pathogens and AMR threats across different settings. Regional and global One Health policies and governance initiatives should foster the concerted development and efficient utilization of pathogen genomic surveillance to protect the health of humans, animals, and the environment.

COPYRIGHT © 2022 Kozlakidis and Struelens. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. Editorial: Insights in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) surveillance, prevention and treatment

Background: Point of care testing (POCT) for infectious diseases is testing conducted near the patient. It allows clinicians to offer the most appropriate treatment more quickly. As POCT devices have increased in accuracy and become more cost-effective, their use has grown, but a systematic assessment of their use for clinical and public health management of infectious diseases in EU/EEA countries has not been previously undertaken. Methods: A scoping review of the literature on POCT in EU/ EEA countries as at November 2019, and a survey of key stakeholders. Results: 350 relevant articles were identified and 54 survey responses from 26 EU/EEA countries were analysed. POCT is available for a range of infectious diseases and in all countries responding to the survey (for at least one disease). POCT is commonly available for influenza, HIV/AIDS, Legionnaires' disease and malaria, where it is used in at least half of EU/EEA countries. While POCT has the potential to support many improvements to clinical care of infectious diseases (e.g., faster diagnosis, more appropriate use of antimicrobials), the results suggest POCT is infrequently used to support public health functions (e.g., disease surveillance and reporting). Conclusion: Although POCT is in use to some extent in all EU/EEA countries, the full benefits of POCT in wider public health functions have yet to be realised. Further research on barriers and facilitators to implementation is warranted.

The response of the scientific community to the COVID-19 pandemic has been unprecedented in size, speed and discovery output. Within months of virus emergence, the SARS-CoV-2 genomics, replication, evolution and dissemination dynamics as well as natural history, infection risk and prognostic factors and biology of the disease have been gradually deciphered. More than 250 articles on COVID-19 published in Frontiers in Public Health have contributed to these insights. We discuss here some of the key research themes and challenges that have been addressed. We provide our perspective on current research issues with surveillance data quality and limitations of epidemiological methods. We warn against the potential misuse or misleading interpretation of public data of variable quality and the use of inadequate study designs for the evaluation of effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions. We conclude by interrogating possible public health strategies for pandemic control as well as discuss the ethical responsibilities and democratic accountability of researchers in their role as experts and policy advisors.

Background Timely reporting of microbiology test results is essential for infection management. Automated, machine-to-machine (M2M) reporting of diagnostic and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) data from laboratory information management systems (LIMS) to public health agencies improves timeliness and completeness of communicable disease surveillance. Aim We surveyed microbiology data reporting practices for national surveillance of EU-notifiable diseases in European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries in 2018. Methods European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) National Microbiology and Surveillance Focal Points completed a questionnaire on the modalities and scope of clinical microbiology laboratory data reporting. Results Complete data were provided for all 30 EU/EEA countries. Clinical laboratories used a LIMS in 28 countries. LIMS data on EU-notifiable diseases and AMR were M2M-reported to the national level in 14 and nine countries, respectively. In the 14 countries, associated demographic data reported allowed the de-duplication of patient reports. In 13 countries, M2M-reported data were used for cluster detection at the national level. M2M laboratory data reporting had been validated against conventional surveillance methods in six countries, and replaced those in five. Barriers to M2M reporting included lack of information technology support and financial incentives. Conclusion M2M-reported laboratory data were used for national public health surveillance and alert purposes in nearly half of the EU/EEA countries in 2018. Reported data on infectious diseases and AMR varied in extent and disease coverage across countries and laboratories. Improving automated laboratory-based surveillance will depend on financial and regulatory incentives, and harmonisation of health information and communication systems.

EDITORIAL article Front. Public Health, 19 May 2020Sec. Infectious Diseases – Surveillance, Prevention and Treatment Volume 8 - 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00179

Analysis of sequencing data for 143 blaNDM-1- and blaOXA-48-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from 13 European national collections and the public domain resulted in the identification of 15 previously undetected multi-country transmission clusters. For 10 clusters, cases had prior travel/hospitalisation history in countries outside of the European Union including Egypt, Iran, Morocco, Russia, Serbia, Tunisia and Turkey. These findings highlight the benefit of European whole genome sequencing-based surveillance and data sharing for control of antimicrobial resistance.

To update information on the epidemiological situation and national capacity for detection, surveillance and containment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAb) in Europe, we performed a survey in 37 countries. Nine countries reported regional or inter-regional spread and seven an endemic situation. Laboratories with a reference function, surveillance systems, and a national containment plan for CRAb existed in 30, 23 and eight countries, respectively. A pan-European molecular survey would provide in-depth understanding of the CRAb epidemiology.

EFSA and ECDC were requested by the European Commission to jointly evaluate the possible solutions for the collection and analysis of whole genome sequencing (WGS) data for at least Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella and Escherichia coli by: (1) analysing the outcome of the surveys on the status of the use of WGS of food-borne pathogens in EU/EEA countries in both the food and public health sectors; (2) conducting a consultation of relevant actors to assess state-of-the-art pipelines for collecting and analysing WGS data in Europe; (3) involving relevant stakeholders to assess the needs and requirements for the analysis of WGS data and their comparability; and (4) preparing a technical report on the identification and comparison of potential solutions for the set-up and running of a joint EFSA–ECDC pipeline to collect and analyse WGS data. Logical components of the overall system were identified and technical requirements were prioritised and grouped according to functionality. Eleven platforms (solutions) that integrate the relevant functionalities for collecting, analysing and visualising WGS data were thoroughly described. The degree to which the requirements are met by the different solutions (as of 31 December 2018) was evaluated. The assessment made clear that no single solution meets all the critical requirements and each solution has significant gaps regarding the unmet critical requirements. Therefore, scenarios consisting of a combination of several solutions were considered. As there may be many suitable scenarios, and the choice among them will depend on strategic or financial elements that are not within the scope of this report, it contains the scientific and technical elements necessary to generate scenarios, rather proposing individual scenarios. A scenario builder is presented which includes the significant gaps for each solution/functionality and the limitations and risks to be considered when setting up a joint ECDC–EFSA database for the collection and analysis of WGS data. © European Centre for Disease Control and European Food Safety Authority, 2019

A survey on the epidemiological situation, surveillance and containment activities for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) was conducted in European countries in 2018. All 37 participating countries reported CPE cases. Since 2015, the epidemiological stage of CPE expansion has increased in 11 countries. Reference laboratory capability, dedicated surveillance and a specific national containment plan are in existence in 33, 27 and 14 countries, respectively. Enhanced control efforts are needed for CPE containment in Europe.

The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), under the EU enlargement policy, has supported national efforts of Western Balkan countries to strengthen their communicable disease prevention and control systems. The new EU strategy “A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans” advocates transformation processes that will build the foundation of EU-oriented national reforms. Well-functioning public health microbiology laboratories are key for early detection and control of infectious diseases, and thus maintaining and enhancing health security in Europe. In order to help Western Balkan countries to improve their national capacities, ECDC facilitated needs assessments and identified key areas for advancement toward effective public health microbiology systems. Countries identified gaps in their laboratory data reporting and exchange systems. Harmonized and effective procedures for handling of highly contagious agents and cross-border transportation of biological samples were often lacking, as well as the systematic use of diagnostic testing at the primary care level or referral of patients, in particular for detection of antimicrobial resistance. There is a clear need to address the financial investment required for sustaining sufficient numbers of skilled laboratory workforce, laboratory supplies, and the development of new methods and techniques, including investment in emerging laboratory technologies, such as molecular typing by whole genome sequencing. This article highlights the key areas for investing in public health microbiology laboratories in Western Balkan countries needed to strengthen health security in Europe.

Many new innovative diagnostic approaches have been made available during the last 10 years with major impact on patient care and public health surveillance. In parallel, to enhance the cost-effectiveness of the clinical microbiology laboratories (CMLs), European laboratory professionals have streamlined their organization leading to amalgamation of activities and restructuring of their professional relationships with clinicians and public health specialists. Through this consolidation process, an operational model has emerged that combines large centralized clinical laboratories performing most tests on one high-throughput analytical platform connected to several distal laboratories dealing locally with urgent analyses at near point of care. The centralization of diagnostic services over a large geographical region has given rise to the concept of regional-scale "microbiology laboratories network." Although the volume-driven cost savings associated with such laboratory networks seem self-evident, the consequence(s) for the quality of patient care and infectious disease surveillance and control remain less obvious. In [...] VANDENBERG, Olivier, et al. Control of Infectious Diseases in the Era of European Clinical Microbiology Laboratory Consolidation: New Challenges and Opportunities for the Patient and for Public Health Surveillance. Frontiers in Medicine, 2018, vol. 5, p. 15

In an era of global health threats caused by epidemics of infectious diseases and rising multidrug resistance, microbiology laboratories provide essential scientific evidence for risk assessment, prevention, and control. Microbiology has been at the core of European infectious disease surveillance networks for decades. Since 2010, these networks have been coordinated by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Activities delivered in these networks include harmonization of laboratory diagnostic, antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular typing methods, multicentre method validation, technical capacity mapping, training of laboratory staff, and continuing quality assessment of laboratory testing. Cooperation among the European laboratory networks in the past 7 years has proved successful in strengthening epidemic preparedness by enabling adaptive capabilities for rapid detection of emerging pathogens across Europe. In partnership with food safety authorities, international public health agencies and learned societies, ECDC-supported laboratory networks have also progressed harmonization of routinely used antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular typing methods, thereby significantly advancing the quality, comparability and precision of microbiological information gathered by ECDC for surveillance for zoonotic diseases and multidrug-resistant pathogens in Europe. ECDC continues to act as a catalyst for sustaining continuous practice improvements and strengthening wider access to laboratory capacity across the European Union. Key priorities include optimization and broader use of rapid diagnostics, further integration of whole-genome sequencing in surveillance and electronic linkage of laboratory and public health systems. This article highlights some of the network contributions to public health in Europe and the role that ECDC plays managing these networks.

During 2013-2017, 620 cases of Candida auris were reported in the European Union/European Economic Area - 466 (75.2%) colonisations, 110 (17.7%) bloodstream infections, 40 (6.5%) other infections and four cases (0.6%) of unknown colonisation/infection status - the majority from four large outbreaks. Survey results showed that several countries lacked laboratory capacity and/or information on the occurrence of cases at national level. To prevent further spread, adequate laboratory capacity and infection control preparedness is required in Europe.

BACKGROUND:Infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria are threatening modern health care. However, estimating their incidence, complications, and attributable mortality is challenging. We aimed to estimate the burden of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria of public health concern in countries of the EU and European Economic Area (EEA) in 2015, measured in number of cases, attributable deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs). METHODS:We estimated the incidence of infections with 16 antibiotic resistance-bacterium combinations from European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net) 2015 data that was country-corrected for population coverage. We multiplied the number of bloodstream infections (BSIs) by a conversion factor derived from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control point prevalence survey of health-care-associated infections in European acute care hospitals in 2011-12 to estimate the number of non-BSIs. We developed disease outcome models for five types of infection on the basis of systematic reviews of the literature. FINDINGS:From EARS-Net data collected between Jan 1, 2015, and Dec 31, 2015, we estimated 671 689 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 583 148-763 966) infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria, of which 63·5% (426 277 of 671 689) were associated with health care. These infections accounted for an estimated 33 110 (28 480-38 430) attributable deaths and 874 541 (768 837-989 068) DALYs. The burden for the EU and EEA was highest in infants (aged <1 year) and people aged 65 years or older, had increased since 2007, and was highest in Italy and Greece. INTERPRETATION:Our results present the health burden of five types of infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria expressed, for the first time, in DALYs. The estimated burden of infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and EEA is substantial compared with that of other infectious diseases, and has increased since 2007. Our burden estimates provide useful information for public health decision-makers prioritising interventions for infectious diseases. FUNDING:European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.