Purpose High-speed imaging is required to capture the rapid eyelid motion during blinking. However, the minimum frame rate necessary for accurate measurement remains unclear. This study investigated how video frame rate affects the accuracy of blink metrics. Methods Spontaneous blinks were recorded in 20 participants and reflex blinks were recorded in an additional 10 participants using a 500 frames per second (fps) high-speed infrared camera. Videos were downsampled to simulate acquisition at 250, 100, 50 and 25 fps. Blink metrics were extracted at each frame rate: average and maximum closing/opening velocities, closed-phase duration, total duration, and amplitude. Percentage differences from the 500-fps reference were calculated and agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis with limits of agreement (LoA). Results Agreement with the 500-fps reference varied across metrics. Blink amplitude and duration showed minimal bias and narrow LoA across all frame rates. In contrast, velocity metrics were underestimated at low frame rates, particularly for maximum velocities and reflex blinks. For spontaneous blinks, average closing velocity showed good agreement at 100-250 fps, whereas for reflex blinks, only 250 fps achieved comparable measurements. Average opening velocity was less sensitive to frame rate, with ≥50 fps showing minimal bias. Maximum velocities were markedly underestimated below 250 fps for both blink types. Conclusion Video frame rate significantly impacts the accuracy of certain blink metrics. Low frame rates may be sufficient for estimating blink amplitude and duration, while velocity metrics require higher sampling. A minimum of 250 fps is recommended for a comprehensive assessment of blink dynamics.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE:Blinking plays a vital role in protecting the eye and maintaining ocular surface health. Understanding blink behaviour may help identify ocular surface disorders and detect blink abnormalities associated with systemic or neurological conditions. BACKGROUND:This study assessed the kinematic characteristics of spontaneous blinking versus mechanically evoked reflex blinking and explored their relationship with potentially related ocular surface characteristics. METHODS:This pilot study used high-speed infrared imaging to capture spontaneous and reflex blinking in 11 participants. A five-minute video recording of spontaneous blinking was captured while participants watched a wildlife documentary. Reflex blinking was evoked by delivering a puff of air into the right eye at random intervals. Blink velocity, completeness and duration were determined using custom semi-automated analysis software. Corneal sensitivity, subbasal corneal nerve morphology, non-invasive tear break-up time and tear meniscus height were also assessed. RESULTS:Spontaneous blinking was less complete than reflex blinking (p = 0.012). Closing-phase velocity was greater for reflex blinking than for spontaneous blinking (p < 0.001), whilst no significant difference was observed for opening-phase velocity (p = 0.164). Closed-phase duration was longer for reflex blinking than for spontaneous blinking (p = 0.023), whereas total blink duration did not differ significantly (p = 0.718). Exploratory analyses suggested potential associations between tear film parameters and blink dynamics. CONCLUSION:Differences were found in the kinematic characteristics of spontaneous and reflex blinking. Preliminary associations between blink characteristics and ocular surface parameters warrant confirmation in larger studies. High-speed infrared imaging is a promising technique that may be used in the future to better understand how blinking is affected by ocular, systemic and neurological conditions.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enhanced the capabilities of meibography by enabling objective and quantitative assessment of meibomian gland structure. This review explores the clinical utility of AI-based meibography in the diagnosis and management of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD), with a focus on segmentation, morphological analysis, and disease staging. Developments in deep learning have enabled more precise gland feature extraction, including gland dropout, density, and tortuosity, supporting efforts towards standardised and reproducible clinical evaluation. Although not the focus of this review, insights from traditional image processing techniques are referenced to highlight potential areas of improvement in current AI models. Key issues such as limited modelling of regional gland variation, restricted dataset diversity, and lack of standardised image quality control are discussed. Although significant progress has been made, further work is needed to ensure AI-driven meibography tools are generalisable, interpretable, and suitable for broad clinical implementation.
PURPOSE:The primary sensory location of contact lens discomfort remains unclear. This study utilised selective topical anaesthesia of the ocular surface to investigate if the relative contribution of different tissues to lens-related discomfort could be determined. METHODS:This was a randomised, subject-masked, contralateral eye pilot study involving 10 participants. Mechanical sensitivity was measured at three locations on the ocular surface (cornea, upper and lower eyelid marginal conjunctiva) using a Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer. Following sensitivity measurements, proxymetacaine hydrochloride 0.5% was topically applied to one of the three locations in one eye whilst 0.9% saline was applied to the corresponding location in the fellow eye as a placebo. Sensitivity measurements were then repeated. A pair of rigid contact lenses was subsequently applied and comfort scores were recorded after 5 min using a 0-100 visual analogue scale. RESULTS:The sensitivity of the location anesthetised decreased significantly (all Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.006), whilst the sensitivity of the unanaesthetised remaining two locations showed no significant change (all p>0.05). There was no significant change in sensitivity following the application of saline (all p>0.05). There was no significant difference in comfort following lens application between the anaesthetic and saline for the cornea and lower lid marginal conjunctiva [LSM difference (95% CI): -3.0 (-11.3, 5.3) and 2.0 (-6.3, 10.3), respectively]. However, comfort was significantly better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised compared to saline application [12.3 (4.0, 20.6)]. CONCLUSION:This work has demonstrated a novel technique which can successfully selectively anaesthetise specific regions of the ocular surface. The initial comfort of rigid lenses was better when the upper lid marginal conjunctiva was anaesthetised, which supports the hypothesis that initial comfort of rigid lenses may be driven by the interaction between the lens and the upper eyelid. This work may also have significant utility for investigating discomfort in soft contact lenses.
Purpose: To investigate the influence of lens type and power on contact lens-handling characteristics.
To investigate gaze and behavioural metrics at different viewing distances with multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs), single vision contact lenses (SVCLs) and progressive addition lenses (PALs). Fifteen presbyopic contact lens wearers participated over five separate study visits. At each visit, participants were randomly assigned to wear one of five refractive corrections: habitual PAL spectacles, delefilcon A (Alcon Inc.) MFCLs and three separate pairs of delefilcon A single vision lenses worn as distance, intermediate and near corrections. Participants wore a Pupil Core headset to record eye and head movements while performing three visual tasks: reading, visual search and scene observation. Data were investigated using linear regression and post-hoc testing. Parameters of interest included gaze (fixation duration, head movement) and behavioural (reading speed, reading accuracy, visual search time) metrics. Reading speed in SVCLs was significantly faster than in MFCLs and PAL spectacles (F = 16.3, p < 0.0001). Refractive correction worn did not influence visual search times (F = 0.16, p = 0.85). Fixation duration was significantly affected by the type of visual task (F = 60.2, p < 0.001), and an interaction effect was observed between viewing distance and refractive correction (F = 4.3, p = 0.002). There was significantly more horizontal and vertical head movement (F = 3.2, p = 0.01 and F = 3.3, p = 0.01, respectively) during visual search tasks when wearing PAL spectacles compared to SVCLs or MFCLs. This work showed that the type of refractive correction affects behavioural metrics such as reading speed and gaze behaviour by affecting horizontal and vertical head movements. The findings of this study suggest that under certain conditions, wearers of MFCLs make fewer head movements compared to PAL spectacles. Gaze behaviour metrics offer a new approach to compare and understand contact lens and spectacle performance, with potential applications including peripheral optical designs for myopia management.
To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated. Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference −0.04 mm, 95
To investigate whether there is a measurable change in meibomian gland morphological characteristics over the course of a day (12 h) and over a month. The study enrolled 15 participants who attended a total of 11 study visits spanning a 5-week period. To assess diurnal changes in meibomian glands, seven visits were conducted on a single day, each 2 h apart. For monthly assessment, participants attended an additional visit at the same time of the day every week for three consecutive weeks. Meibography using the LipiView® II system was performed at each visit, and meibomian gland morphological parameters were calculated using custom semi-automated software. Specifically, six central glands were analysed for gland length ratio, gland width, gland area, gland intensity and gland tortuosity. The average meibomian gland morphological metrics did not exhibit significant changes during the course of a day or over a month. Nonetheless, certain individual gland metrics demonstrated notable variation over time, both diurnally and monthly. Specifically, meibomian gland length ratio, area, width and tortuosity exhibited significant changes both diurnally and monthly when assessed on a gland-by-gland basis. Meibomian glands demonstrated measurable structural change over short periods of time (hours and days). These results have implications for innovation in gland imaging and for developing precision monitoring of gland structure to assess meibomian gland health more accurately.
Eye strain when performing tasks reliant on a digital environment can cause discomfort, affecting productivity and quality of life. Digital eye strain (the preferred terminology) was defined as "the development or exacerbation of recurrent ocular symptoms and/or signs related specifically to digital device screen viewing". Digital eye strain prevalence of up to 97% has been reported, due to no previously agreed definition/diagnostic criteria and limitations of current questionnaires which fail to differentiate such symptoms from those arising from non-digital tasks. Objective signs such as blink rate or critical flicker frequency changes are not 'diagnostic' of digital eye strain nor validated as sensitive. The mechanisms attributed to ocular surface disease exacerbation are mainly reduced blink rate and completeness, partial/uncorrected refractive error and/or underlying binocular vision anomalies, together with the cognitive demand of the task and differences in position, size, brightness and glare compared to an equivalent non-digital task. In general, interventions are not well established; patients experiencing digital eye strain should be provided with a full refractive correction for the appropriate working distances. Improving blinking, optimizing the work environment and encouraging regular breaks may help. Based on current, best evidence, blue-light blocking interventions do not appear to be an effective management strategy. More and larger clinical trials are needed to assess artificial tear effectiveness for relieving digital eye strain, particularly comparing different constituents; a systematic review within the report identified use of secretagogues and warm compress/humidity goggles/ambient humidifiers as promising strategies, along with nutritional supplementation (such as omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and berry extracts).
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning algorithm for Meibomian gland characteristics calculation.Design: Evaluation of diagnostic technology.Subjects: A total of 1616 meibography images of both the upper (697) and lower (919) eyelids from a total of 282 individuals.Methods: Images were collected using the LipiView II device. All the provided data were split into 3 sets: the training, validation, and test sets. Data partitions used proportions of 70/10/20% and included data from 2 optometry settings. Each set was separately partitioned with these proportions, resulting in a balanced distri-bution of data from both settings. The images were divided based on patient identifiers, such that all images collected for one participant could end up only in one set. The labeled images were used to train a deep learning model, which was subsequently used for Meibomian gland segmentation. The model was then applied to calculate individual Meibomian gland metrics. Interreader agreement and agreement between manual and automated methods for Meibomian gland segmentation were also carried out to assess the accuracy of the automated approach.Main Outcome Measures: Meibomian gland metrics, including length ratio, area, tortuosity, intensity, and width, were measured. Additionally, the performance of the automated algorithms was evaluated using the aggregated Jaccard index.Results: The proposed semantic segmentation-based approach achieved average aggregated Jaccard index of mean 0.4718 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4680-0.4771) for the 'gland' class and a mean of 0.8470 (95% CI, 0.8432-0.8508) for the 'eyelid' class. The result for object detection-based approach was a mean of 0.4476 (95% CI, 0.4426-0.4533). Both artificial intelligence-based algorithms underestimated area, length ratio, tortuosity, widthmean, widthmedian, width10th, and width90th. Meibomian gland intensity was overestimated by both algorithms compared with the manual approach. The object detection-based algorithm seems to be as reliable as the manual approach only for Meibomian gland width10th calculation.Conclusions: The proposed approach can successfully segment Meibomian glands; however, to overcome problems with gland overlap and lack of image sharpness, the proposed method requires further development. The study presents another approach to utilizing automated, artificial intelligence-based methods in Meibomian gland health assessment that may assist clinicians in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of Meibomian gland dysfunction.Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article. Ophthalmology Science 2023;3:100334 & COPY; 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Supplemental material available at www.ophthalmologyscience.org.
Purpose: To develop and evaluate a custom imaging system to provide high-resolution, wide depth-of-field, reflection-free, multispectral infrared (IR) imaging of the Meibomian glands. Methods: Lower eyelids of 15 volunteers were everted to obtain multispectral images of the Meibomian glands with custom imaging setup. Photographs were captured at 10 different ISO settings (from underexposure to overexposure) and using nine IR imaging filters (ranging from 600 nm to 1000 nm in 50-nm steps). Meibomian gland contrast (simple and Michelson) was calculated for the images to choose an optimal wavelength for Meibomian gland imaging and to determine differences in contrast across individu-als. Results: The overall linear regression model showed a significant effect of wavelength on Meibomian gland contrast (Simple contrast: F = 7.24, P < 0.0001; Michelson contrast: F = 7.19, P < 0.0001). There was a significant negative correlation between Meibomian gland contrast and Meibomian gland depth for 750-nm IR filter (& rho;s = -0.579; P = 0.026). Conclusions: Meibomian gland contrast varies across individuals and depends on Meibomian gland depth. IR filter of 750 nm is the optimal choice for Meibomian gland imaging because it provides images of greatest contrast. Translational Relevance: This study adds to our understanding of Meibomian gland imaging. It has successfully demonstrated that Meibomian glands that are deeper in the tarsal plate require longer wavelengths for imaging.
Clinical RelevanceEvaluating how Meibomian glands can change in appearance has the potential to advance the understanding of Meibomian gland health and may lead to enhanced diagnosis and therapy.BackgroundThis work aimed to investigate Meibomian gland appearance after therapeutic Meibomian gland expression.MethodsFifteen subjects attended three study visits over a two-week period. Meibography was performed before and after therapeutic Meibomian gland expression, the following day, and 2 weeks after expression. Six central glands were used to calculate Meibomian gland morphological parameters such as gland length ratio, gland width, gland area, gland tortuosity, and gland contrast. A custom semi-automated image analysis software was used to calculate Meibomian gland metrics. Furthermore, a high-resolution imaging system was developed to capture clear images of the Meibomian glands, free of any artefacts, which were used for precise calculations of Meibomian gland contrast.ResultsThe expression procedure had a significant impact on Meibomian gland contrast and length ratio immediately afterwards. The least square mean difference (95% CI) from baseline for Michelson contrast was -0.006 (-0.010, -0.001) and -1.048 (-2.063, -0.033) for simple contrast. The least square mean ratio of the gland length ratio immediately after the expression to baseline was 0.758 (0.618, 0.931).ConclusionsFollowing therapeutic expression, Meibomian glands exhibit reduced brightness and length. However, within 24 h, they appear to recover and return to their baseline state, indicating a relatively short recovery time. This sheds light on whether meibography is solely focused on capturing gland structure or if it also captures acinar activity. The hyperreflective properties of lipids suggest that the decrease in contrast observed after expression could be attributed to a reduction in the visualisation of acini activity. A decrease in Meibomian gland length ratio implies that the loss of gland structure following treatment may be indicative of a temporary structural alteration.
Meibography is a visualisation technique that has been used for over 40 years.There have been significant improvements in image quality, examination technique and image interpretation over this period.Although meibography has received sporadic reviews in the past, an updated review is timely due to the rapid recent rise of relevant technology and advances in both image processing and artificial intelligence.The primary aim of this paper is to review recent research into Meibomian gland imaging and update the community about the most relevant technologies and approaches used in the field.
Purpose The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the initial effect of contact lens wear on spontaneous blink characteristics. Methods This was a randomised, crossover pilot study. Spontaneous blinking was recorded using a high-speed infrared camera in ten subjects with three different soft contact lenses (spherical hydrogel, spherical silicone hydrogel and toric hydrogel), one rigid contact lens and without contact lenses. Custom semi-automated software was used to determine palpebral aperture height, interblink interval (IBI), blink speed, blink completeness and blink duration. Results The IBI was significantly greater for non-lens wear compared with the silicone hydrogel [ratio (95% CI): 1.34 (1.16, 1.55), p < 0.0001], toric hydrogel [1.28 (1.10, 1.48), p = 0.0001] and rigid corneal lenses [1.48 (1.27, 1.73), p < 0.0001]. The spherical silicone hydrogel lens showed greater closing-phase speed than non-lens wear [mean difference (95% CI): 27.4 (5.6, 49.1) mm/s, p = 0.006]. Shorter total blink duration was found for non-lens wear compared with any of the lens types [spherical hydrogel: ratio 0.89 (0.81, 0.98), p = 0.01; spherical silicone hydrogel: 0.87 (0.80, 0.95), p = 0.0001; toric hydrogel: 0.90 (0.83, 0.98), p = 0.004; and rigid corneal: 0.88 (0.82, 0.96), p = 0.0004]. Opening-phase speed (p = 0.12) and blink completeness metrics (all p > 0.5) were not influenced by wearing condition. Conclusion This work showed that short-term contact lens wear influenced the palpebral aperture height, IBI, speed and duration of the blink, and the effect is dependent on the contact lens type. The completeness of the blink was not altered by contact lens wear. Future work should be conducted to assess the effect of long-term wear of different contact lens types on blink characteristics. The measurement of spontaneous blinking characteristics represents an immediate, sensitive and non-invasive evaluation of the impact of a contact lens on the ocular surface.
Purpose: Anecdotal reports suggest that dry eye symptoms and contact lens discomfort are increased during air travel. It has been hypothesised that this reduction in ocular comfort may relate to a reduction in environmental humidity, however there is little information in the literature on the environmental conditions within the aircraft cabin. This study investigated the environmental conditions inside the cabins of short-haul (SH) and long-haul (LH) aircraft in flight.
PURPOSE:To test the hypothesis that various subjective ocular and task-related parameters associated with wearing a face mask would be better in neophyte contact lens (CL) wear compared to habitual spectacle (Sp) wear. METHODS:Thirty participants were randomised to continue in Sp (n = 15) or wear somofilcon A daily disposable CL (n = 15) ('group'). A surgical face mask (Type II R) was worn for at least one hour per day on four or more days per week. After two weeks, participants completed the Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction Questionnaire (QIRC), a two-part face mask usability questionnaire and graded ocular-related symptoms using 0-100 visual analogue scales. RESULTS:There was no difference between groups for overall QIRC score but some individual question scores reflected better quality of life in the CL: 'outdoor activities', 'keep fit' and 'able to do things' (all p < 0.05). Differences in favour of the CL were seen for the following in the face mask usability questionnaire: 'breathing', 'heat', 'comfort on ears', 'overall comfort', 'walking', 'driving', 'reading', 'computer use', 'exercising' and 'socialising' (all p < 0.05). Significant differences were also seen for the 0-100 VAS symptoms probing vision quality in favour of the CL: glare, distance and near vision, fogging, restricted field of view and peripheral blur. CONCLUSION:This work supports anecdotal reports that CL are a better vision correction option than Sp when used in conjunction with a face mask. Participants reported a range of benefits to the CL/face mask combination for vision-related symptoms, breathing and heat-related symptoms and a number of day-to-day activities including walking, driving and exercising. All of the benefits relating to the CL are likely to result in improved adherence to face mask use. Overall, the findings of this work suggest that where possible, CL should be the preferred vision correction option for people using face masks.
Contact lenses in the future will likely have functions other than correction of refractive error. Lenses designed to control the development of myopia are already commercially available. Contact lenses as drug delivery devices and powered through advancements in nanotechnology will open up further opportunities for unique uses of contact lenses. This review examines the use, or potential use, of contact lenses aside from their role to correct refractive error. Contact lenses can be used to detect systemic and ocular surface diseases, treat and manage various ocular conditions and as devices that can correct presbyopia, control the development of myopia or be used for augmented vision. There is also discussion of new developments in contact lens packaging and storage cases. The use of contact lenses as devices to detect systemic disease has mostly focussed on detecting changes to glucose levels in tears for monitoring diabetic control. Glucose can be detected using changes in colour, fluorescence or generation of electric signals by embedded sensors such as boronic acid, concanavalin A or glucose oxidase. Contact lenses that have gained regulatory approval can measure changes in intraocular pressure to monitor glaucoma by measuring small changes in corneal shape. Challenges include integrating sensors into contact lenses and detecting the signals generated. Various techniques are used to optimise uptake and release of the drugs to the ocular surface to treat diseases such as dry eye, glaucoma, infection and allergy. Contact lenses that either mechanically or electronically change their shape are being investigated for the management of presbyopia. Contact lenses that slow the development of myopia are based upon incorporating concentric rings of plus power, peripheral optical zone(s) with add power or non-monotonic variations in power. Various forms of these lenses have shown a reduction in myopia in clinical trials and are available in various markets.
Purpose: This work set out to investigate if there was an association between subjective comfort and both subjective and measured vision during the use of contemporary daily disposable soft toric contact lenses. Methods: Thirty-eight habitual soft contact lens wearers wore each of three daily disposable toric lenses for one week in a prospective, crossover, randomised, single-masked study. The following clinical measures were recorded at dispensing and follow-up visits: biomicroscopy scores, lens fitting (including rotation and rotational stability), high and low contrast visual acuity, subjective vision quality and subjective ocular surface comfort. Subjective scores were collected using 0-10 numerical grading scales. Comfort scores were analysed using a linear regression model with age, sex, visit, phase of crossover ('phase'), lens type, lens rotation, lens rotational stability, visual acuity, cylinder power and subjective vision quality as factors of interest and then refined using backward stepwise regression. Results: Thirty six participants (31.1 +/- 13.5 years) completed the study. Comfort scores were found to be associated with subjective vision quality (F = 127.0 ; p < 0.0001), phase (F = 7.2; p = 0.001) and lens type (F = 4.9; p = 0.009). Greater comfort scores were observed with greater subjective vision quality scores. Visual acuity was not statistically significant in the model. Conclusion: This work suggests that symptoms of ocular discomfort may be more intense if there is also perceived visual compromise in daily disposable soft toric lenses. There was a stronger positive correlation between comfort and subjective vision quality compared with comfort and measured visual acuity.