We have explored data-driven methods for material microstructure quantification that improve sensitivity to microstructural changes compared to traditional approaches. The methods integrate multiple microstructural properties, including grain morphology, crystallographic orientation, and material phase information. The simpler method employs maps of the Euclidean distance transformation metric to evaluate the morphology of grain boundary networks. The more intensive approach employs generalized spherical harmonic mapping for crystallographic orientations, per-pixel phase information, and a variational auto-encoder for dimensionality reduction and results in a multidimensional clustering of by microstructure similarity. Applied to an experimental dataset of additively manufactured steel, both methods detected slight variations in samples produced under nominally identical processing conditions. Both methods were able to distinguish between samples from multiple (nominally identical) builds, while the generalized spherical harmonics-based method could additionally cluster data samples rotated at two orientations on the build plate. The improved sensitivity of the methods, demonstrated through comparison with traditional microstructure characterization techniques, offers advantages for microstructure quantification and comparisons in advanced manufacturing applications.

Recent experimental studies suggest the use of spatially extended laser beam profiles as a strategy to control the melt pool during laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing. However, linkages connecting laser beam profiles to thermal fields and resultant microstructures have not been established. Herein, we employ a coupled thermal transport-Monte Carlo model to predict the evolution of temperature fields and grain microstructures during LPBF using Gaussian, ring, and Bessel beam profiles. Simulation results reveal that the ring-shaped beam yields lower temperatures compared with the Gaussian beam. Owing to the small melt pool size when using the Bessel beam, the grains are smaller in size and more equiaxed compared to those using the Gaussian and ring beams. Our approach provides future avenues to predict the impact of laser beam shaping on microstructure development during LPBF.