Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a potentially curable disease, but affected patients often struggle in everyday life due to disease- and therapy-associated sequelae. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) is the standard consolidation therapy, replacing whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) amongst others due to less long-term cognitive decline. Nevertheless, white matter lesions (WML) are common findings in brain MRI after HDC/ASCT, but their clinical significance remains underexplored. Here, we correlate WML and brain atrophy with neuropsychological and quality-of-life evaluations collected post-treatment. We found that a significant part of PNCSL long-term survivors develop a high WML burden after HDC/ASCT, but we fail to associate them with specific patient or therapy characteristics. Intriguingly, even a high WML burden does not seem to affect QoL, basic neurocognition testing or performance status negatively. These results contrast findings in previous neuroimaging studies on healthy and cancer patients.

Background Available treatments for older patients with primary diffuse large B-cell CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) offer progression -free survival of up to 16 months. We aimed to investigate an intensified treatment of high -dose chemotherapy and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) in older patients with PCNSL. Methods MARTA was a prospective, single -arm, phase 2 study done at 15 research hospitals in Germany. Patients aged 65 years or older with newly diagnosed, untreated PCNSL were enrolled if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and were fit for high -dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT. Induction treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of high -dose intravenous methotrexate 3 center dot 5 g/m2 (day 1), intravenous cytarabine 2 g/m2 twice daily (days 2 and 3), and intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (days 0 and 4) followed by highdose chemotherapy with intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2 (day -8), intravenous busulfan 3 center dot 2 mg/kg (days -7 and -6), and intravenous thiotepa 5 mg/kg (days -5 and -4) plus autologous HSCT. The primary endpoint was progression -free survival at 12 months in all patients who met eligibility criteria and started treatment. The study was registered with the German clinical trial registry, DRKS00011932, and recruitment is complete. Findings Between Nov 28, 2017, and Sept 16, 2020, 54 patients started induction treatment and 51 were included in the full analysis set. Median age was 71 years (IQR 68-75); 27 (53%) patients were female and 24 (47%) were male. At a median follow-up of 23 center dot 0 months (IQR 16 center dot 8-37 center dot 4), 23 (45%) of 51 patients progressed, relapsed, or died. 12-month progression -free survival was 58 center dot 8% (80% CI 48 center dot 9-68 center dot 2; 95% CI 44 center dot 1-70 center dot 9). During induction treatment, the most common grade 3-5 toxicities were thrombocytopenia and leukopenia (each in 52 [96%] of 54 patients). During highdose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT, the most common grade 3-5 toxicity was leukopenia (37 [100%] of 37 patients). Treatment-related deaths were reported in three (6%) of 54 patients, all due to infectious complications. Interpretation Although the primary efficacy threshold was not met, short induction followed by high -dose chemotherapy and autologous HSCT is active in selected older patients with PCNSL and could serve as a benchmark for comparative trials. Funding Else Kroner-Fresenius Foundation, Riemser Pharma, and Medical Center-University of Freiburg. Copyright (c) 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Topic: 19. Aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma - Clinical Background: Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) confers a dismal prognosis and treatment advances are constrained by the lack of prospective studies and real-world treatment evidence. Aims: To determine real-world patient characteristics, treatments and outcomes of SCNSL. Methods: Patients with SCNSL of all entities were included at first diagnosis from June 2011 to June 2022 and patient characteristics, treatment data, and outcomes were prospectively collected in the Secondary CNS Lymphoma Registry (SCNSL-R) (NCT05114330). Kaplan Meier estimator was applied to estimate OS for baseline covariables at the time of SCNSL diagnosis, and log-rank test was used for comparison of survival curves. To assess, if HDT-ASCT had a positive effect on OS in patients achieving a CR or PR upon induction therapy, we applied a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model controlling for known prognostic factors in SCNSL by modelling HDT-ASCT treatment as a time-dependent covariable. Results: 279 patients from 47 institutions in Germany, Switzerland, Israel and Austria were enrolled and 243 patients (median age: 66 years; range: 23-86) were available for analysis. Of those, 49 (20%) patients presented with synchronous (cohort I) and 194 (80%) with metachronous SCNSL (cohort II). The predominant histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 68%), followed by follicular lymphoma grade I-IIIA (n=16, 7%) and mantle cell lymphoma (n=13, 5%). At initial diagnosis before CNS involvement, cohort II patients most frequently presented with Ann Arbor stage IV (n=110; 57%) and extranodal involvement (n=156, 80%). Bone marrow was the most commonly affected extranodal site at initial lymphoma diagnosis in cohort II (n=56, 29%), followed by involvement of kidney/adrenal, gastrointestinal (each n=25, 13%), lung/pleura, and testes (each n=23, 12%) Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of CNS involvement was 17·2 months (95% CI 12-27·5), with longer OS in cohort I (60·6 months, 95% CI 45·5-not estimable (NE)) than cohort II (11·4 months, 95% CI 7·8-17·7). Predominant induction regimens included R-CHOP/high-dose MTX (cohort I) and high-dose MTX/cytarabine (cohort II). Rituximab was used in 166 (68%) of patients with B-cell lymphoma. The overall response rate to induction therapy was 54%, with 84 (35%) and 46 (19%) patients achieving a complete response (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. When CNS relapse of DLBCL was accompanied by a systemic relapse, patients had inferior outcomes compared to those with isolated CNS involvement (17·2 months (95% CI 9·7-30·6) vs 6·6 months (95% CI 3·8-9), p=0·0026). A total of 103 patients (42%) underwent HDT-ASCT, with BCNU/Etoposide/Thiotepa being the most prevalent regimen in 25 (24%) patients. Patients who achieved partial response (PR) or better benefitted from consolidating high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) (HR adjusted 0·49, 95% CI 0·24-0·97, p = 0·0418). Summary/Conclusion: This study is the largest prospective cohort of SCNSL patients providing a comprehensive overview of an international real-world treatment landscape and outcomes. Prognosis was better in patients with SCNSL involvement at initial diagnosis (cohort I) and consolidating HDT-ASCT prolonged survival in patients with PR or better. For rational clinical trial design, a precise understanding of the real-world treatment landscape of SCNSL is crucial and provided by our prospective registry study. Keywords: Real world data, CNS lymphoma, Clinical trial, DLBCL

Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET-CT imaging pre-virotherapy versus day 24 post virotherapy.

Inflammatory response following GL-ONC1 therapy.

BACKGROUND:Secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) confers a dismal prognosis and treatment advances are constrained by the lack of prospective studies and real-world treatment evidence. METHODS:Patients with SCNSL of all entities were included at first diagnosis and patient characteristics, treatment data, and outcomes were prospectively collected in the Secondary CNS Lymphoma Registry (SCNSL-R) (NCT05114330). FINDINGS:279 patients from 47 institutions were enrolled from 2011 to 2022 and 243 patients (median age: 66 years; range: 23-86) were available for analysis. Of those, 49 (20 %) patients presented with synchronous (cohort I) and 194 (80 %) with metachronous SCNSL (cohort II). The predominant histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL, 68 %). Median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of CNS involvement was 17·2 months (95 % CI 12-27·5), with longer OS in cohort I (60·6 months, 95 % CI 45·5-not estimable (NE)) than cohort II (11·4 months, 95 % CI 7·8-17·7, log-rank test p < 0.0001). Predominant induction regimens included R-CHOP/high-dose MTX (cohort I) and high-dose MTX/cytarabine (cohort II). Rituximab was used in 166 (68 %) of B-cell lymphoma. Undergoing consolidating high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT) in partial response (PR) or better was associated with longer OS (HR adjusted 0·47 (95 % CI 0·25-0·89), p = 0·0197). INTERPRETATION:This study is the largest prospective cohort of SCNSL patients providing a comprehensive overview of an international real-world treatment landscape and outcomes. Prognosis was better in patients with SCNSL involvement at initial diagnosis (cohort I) and consolidating HDT-ASCT was associated with favorable outcome in patients with PR or better.

Biological verification of calculated GL-ONC1 dosages.

Characterization of ascites sample contents based on cytological analyses (patient 01).

Primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) are rare and associated with an adverse prognosis. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC/ASCT) improves progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) but neurocognition, performance status and quality of life (QoL) in patient-reported outcome (PRO) after HDC/ASCT remains underexplored. Especially elderly patients may insufficiently recover from this demanding therapy. Therefore, this single-center analysis investigated all PCNSL patients who received HDC/ASCT at the University Hospital Tübingen from 2006–2021 (n = 40, median age 60.5 years) in a retrospective manner. The 2-year PFS/OS was 78.7%/77.3%, respectively, without significant differences between the tested age-groups (≤60 vs. >60 years, p = 0.531/p = 0.334). Higher Thiotepa dosage was an independent predictor for better OS (p = 0.018). Additionally, a one-time prospective, cross-sectional analysis after HDC/ASCT in the same cohort was performed (n = 31; median follow-up 45 months). Here, the median ECOG improved by HDC/ASCT from 1 to 0 and mini-mental state examinations revealed unimpaired neurocognitive functioning (median 28 pts.). PRO data collected by EORTC QLQ-C30 showed a good QoL in both age groups with an average global health status (GHS) of 68.82% (≤60y: 64.72%, >60y: 74.14%). Together, our data indicate that HDC/ASCT is an effective therapy with respect to disease control, overall health status and quality of life, irrespective of patient age.

Cytological analyses of further study patients.

Background: Only a minority of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients can eventually successfully discontinue tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy after achieving a stable deep molecular remission. Mechanisms underlying a durable treatment free remission (TFR) are not well understood but supposedly involve restoration of anti-CML immunity. It was therefore hypothesized that interferon alpha (IFN) - a potent inducer of Th1-immunity and prior standard therapy in CML - might improve the TFR probability. Randomized trials to improve TFR rates in CML are currently lacking. ENDURE, CML-IX (NCT03117816) is a multicenter, international phase III trial evaluating the role of a novel form of pegylated proline interferon-alpha 2b (ropeg-interferon-alpha, ropeg-IFN) in inducing TFR. Patients and Methods: CML patients in stable deep molecular remission (MR4 or better for at least 12 months prior to screening) and with history of at least 3 years of TKI exposure were eligible to participate in this study. Patients in stable molecular remission could also be included if they had failed a former TKI discontinuation attempt (2nd stopper). Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either ropeg-IFN 100μg s.c. every 2 weeks for 15 months (ropeg-IFN arm) or no further treatment after TKI stop treatment (no treatment arm). The primary efficacy endpoint of the trial was molecular relapse free survival (MRFS) with molecular relapse being defined as loss of major molecular remission (MMR), which is any increase of the BCR::ABL1 transcript level to >0.1% according to the international scale (IS). Time to relapse is defined as the time from randomization to relapse. Secondary endpoints were MRFS at month 6, 12 and 24 after TKI discontinuation. BCR::ABL1 measurable residual disease (MRD) was monitored from peripheral blood and centrally assessed for all centers in Germany and locally at the French centers. There was a post study follow up to collect clinical and molecular data. Results: Between May 2017 and June 2021, 203 evaluable patients (68 female, 135 male) with a median age of 55 years were randomized at 24 centers in Germany and 3 centers in France to receive ropeg-IFN (n=95) or no treatment (n=108) after TKI stop. For 77 patients in the ropeg-IFN arm (81%) and 86 patients in the no treatment arms (80%) it was their first TKI discontinuation attempt. At the time of data cut off in June 2022, the median observation time for all patients was 36 months. The hazard ratio (HR) of molecular relapse for the ropeg-IFN cohort versus the no treatment cohort was 1.03 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.1.55; log-rank P=0.89). The Kaplan-Meier probabilities of molecular relapse free survival (MRFS) by 6, 12, and 24 months after TKI discontinuation were 73% (95%-CI: 62-81%), 64% (95-CI: 53-73%) and 56% (95%-CI: 45-66%) for the ropeg-IFN versus 67% (95-CI: 57-75%), 60% (95-CI: 50-69%) and 59% (95%-CI: 49-68%) for no treatment (Figure 1). The MRFS at months 6 and 12 after TKI stop (secondary endpoints) were 70% (95%-CI: 60-79%) and 64% (95%-CI: 53-73%) in 91 patients for ropeg-IFN group versus 65% (95-CI: 56-74%) and 59% (95-CI: 49-68%) in 107 and 104 patients for the no treatment group. Of 90 patients who were candidates for restarting TKI due to MMR loss, 82 patients were actually evaluable for TKI restart. Of those, 77 patients re-achieved at least MMR within 12 months (median time to reestablishing MMR was three months). Of the 5 patients who did not regain MMR, one patient withdrew consent and others were treated for only 1, 3, 4, and 11 months after TKI restart. Ropeg-IFN was well tolerated. Hematological and non-hematological WHO grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 23 patients in the ropeg-IFN (31 adverse events) and in 20 patients in the no treatment arm (26 adverse events). Three deaths were reported on study which were unrelated to CML (cardiac arrest, fall from stairs, unknown). A detailed safety analysis will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Ropeg-IFN maintenance after discontinuing TKI-monotherapy does not increase the proportion of patients, who persistently maintain at least an MMR. The German CML-V (TIGER) trial currently explores the impact of IFN maintenance on TFR when patients receive a combination of TKI plus IFN before TKI stop. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Introduction: High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based induction chemo-immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) has been shown to be feasible and effective in younger and in selected elderly PCNSL patients. We aimed to investigate this treatment approach in patients > 65 years with newly diagnosed PCNSL in a multicentre study. Methods: This open-label, multicentre, single arm phase II study was conducted at 15 German centres (DRKS 00011932). Main eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed PCNSL, immunocompetence, age > 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. Induction treatment consisted of two 21-day cycles of HD-MTX 3.5 g/m² (day 1), cytarabine 2 g/m² twice daily (days 2, 3) and rituximab 375 mg/m² before and after each chemotherapy with stem cell harvest after the 1st cycle. Patients not suffering disease progression subsequently received consolidation treatment with HCT-ASCT with rituximab 375 mg/m² (day -8), busulfan 3.2 mg/kg (days -7, -6), thiotepa 5 mg/kg/d (days -5, -4) and reinfusion of stem cells (day 0). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 1 year by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), treatment response and toxicities. Results: Between Nov 2017 and Sept 2020, we registered 57 patients. Five patients were excluded because of systemic lymphoma manifestation, absence of measurable radiologic lesion(s), inadequate renal function, ECOG PS >2 and deterioration before the start of study treatment. Finally, 52 eligible patients were included in the ITT population. Mean age was 72 years (range 65-80 years), 27/52 (51.9%) patients initially presented with an ECOG PS > 1. All patients started induction chemo-immunotherapy, 45 of 52 (86.5%) patients completed induction treatment. Thirty-seven of 52 (71.2%) patients proceeded to HCT-ASCT. Most common serious adverse events were infections, renal failure and (cerebro)vascular events, which mainly occurred during induction treatment. Overall, 22 (42.3%) patients died, 12 of whom (23.1%) without evidence of disease progression or relapse. Three (5.8%) patients died because of treatment-related complications, all of them during induction treatment. An additional patient died within 30 days after HCT-ASCT due to fatal viral pneumonia, main other non treatment-related causes of deaths were late infections and (cerebro)vascular events. Forty-one of 52 (78.8%) patients responded to induction treatment; 23 (44.2%) patients achieved a (unconfirmed) complete response and 11 (21.2%) patients a partial response 30 days after HCT-ASCT. After an estimated median follow-up of 23 months, PFS at 12 and 24 months was 57.7% (95% CI 43.2-69.7%) and 54.8% (40-67.4%), respectively; median PFS was 41.1 months (95% CI 6.7 to not calculable). Overall survival at 12 and 24 months was 63.1% (95% CI 48.4-74.7%) and 60.5% (95% CI 45.5-72.5%), respectively; median OS was 41.1 months (95% CI 10.3 to not calculable). Of those 37 patients undergoing HCT-ASCT, 2-year PFS and OS rates were 71.7% (95% CI 53.4-83.8%) and 80.8% (95% CI 63.8-90.3%), respectively. Conclusions: Feasibility and efficacy of HCT-ASCT in selected elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL are confirmed in a multicenter setting with survival rates comparable to those of younger cohorts. Nevertheless, non-relapse mortality remains a major challenge in this vulnerable patient population emphasizing that standardized assessment of eligibility for intensive treatment is of utmost importance. This will be addressed in the upcoming randomized phase III PRIMA-CNS trial (DRKS00022768). Final data analysis is currently ongoing and will be presented in detail at the meeting.

ALK-positive histiocytosis is a rare subtype of histiocytic neoplasm first described in 2008 in 3 infants with multisystemic disease involving the liver and hematopoietic system. This entity has subsequently been documented in case reports and series to occupy a wider clinicopathologic spectrum with recurrent KIF5B-ALK fusions. The full clinicopathologic and molecular spectra of ALK-positive histiocytosis remain, however, poorly characterized. Here, we describe the largest study of ALK-positive histiocytosis to date, with detailed clinicopathologic data of 39 cases, including 37 cases with confirmed ALK rearrangements. The clinical spectrum comprised distinct clinical phenotypic groups: infants with multisystemic disease with liver and hematopoietic involvement, as originally described (Group 1A: 6/39), other patients with multisystemic disease (Group 1B: 10/39), and patients with single-system disease (Group 2: 23/39). Nineteen patients of the entire cohort (49%) had neurologic involvement (7 and 12 from Groups 1B and 2, respectively). Histology included classic xanthogranuloma features in almost one-third of cases, whereas the majority displayed a more densely cellular, monomorphic appearance without lipidized histiocytes but sometimes more spindled or epithelioid morphology. Neoplastic histiocytes were positive for macrophage markers and often conferred strong expression of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase, confirming MAPK pathway activation. KIF5B-ALK fusions were detected in 27 patients, whereas CLTC-ALK, TPM3-ALK, TFG-ALK, EML4-ALK, and DCTN1-ALK fusions were identified in single cases. Robust and durable responses were observed in 11/11 patients treated with ALK inhibition, 10 with neurologic involvement. This study presents the existing clinicopathologic and molecular landscape of ALK-positive histiocytosis and provides guidance for the clinical management of this emerging histiocytic entity.

BACKGROUND: Patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) eligible for intensive treatment approaches are currently treated with high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) based induction immuno-chemotherapy followed by consolidative high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT (HDC-ASCT). However, it is unclear whether overcoming chemo-resistance and subsequently eliminating minimal residual disease may also be achieved by conventional-dose non-myeloablative immuno-chemotherapy, comprising non-cross resistant cytotoxic agents able to cross the brain-blood-barrier. We thus conducted an international randomized phase III trial comparing HDC-ASCT with non-myeloablative consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL (MATRix/IELSG43 trial, NCT02531841). This is the first report on its primary endpoint. METHODS: This open label, randomized phase III trial was conducted in 56 centers of 5 countries (Germany, Italy, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland). Main eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed PCNSL, HIV-negative, age 18-65 years irrespective of ECOG PS or 66-70 years with ECOG PS ≤ 2, and adequate organ function. Induction consisted of 4 cycles of MATRix regimen (rituximab 375 mg/m2/d days 0 & 5; methotrexate 3.5 g/m2 day 1; cytarabine 2 × 2 g/m2/d days 2 & 3; thiotepa 30 mg/m2 day 4, every 21 days). Stem cell harvest was conducted after the 2nd cycle. Pts achieving at least partial response (PR) after completion of induction were randomly allocated to either arm A with two courses of R-DeVIC regimen (375 mg/m2 day 0; dexamethasone 40 mg/d days 1 to 3; etoposide 100 mg/m2/d days 1 to 3; ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2/d days 1 to 3; carboplatin 300 mg/m2 day 1); or arm B, consisting of HDC with BCNU 400 mg/m2 (day -6) and thiotepa 2 x 5 mg/kg/d days -5 & -4) followed by ASCT. The primary endpoint progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model, containing the randomized treatment as hypothesis variable and the stratification variable response status as a covariate. RESULTS: Between July 2014 and August 2019, 368 pts were registered; 346 started treatment, 260 (75%) completed the induction therapy, and 115 and 114 pts were randomly assigned to arm A and arm B, respectively. Main reasons for not reaching randomization were toxicities (n= 87; 25%) and disease progression (n= 36; 10%). Median age of the randomized pts was 59 years (range 21 - 70) with 22.3% of pts being 65 years or older. Distribution of patient characteristics were well balanced between arms. Median follow-up of all registered patients is 44 months (range 0,2-86). 239 of 346 (69%) pts responded to induction treatment, 27% achieved a complete remission (CR) and 52% a partial remission (PR). Both consolidation strategies were well tolerated: R-DeVIC and HDC-ASCT were completed in 100 (87%) and 111 (97%) pts, respectively. 13 (3.8%) pts died of treatment-related complications during induction treatment, 11 of them due to neutropenic infectious complications. Consolidation treatment with R-DEVIC or HDC-ASCT resulted in a substantial increase of pts with CR (65% in arm A and 68% in arm B, respectively; p= 0.71). To date, there were 79 PFS events: 67 pts experienced progressive disease after randomization (47 for arm A and 20 for arm B). 6 pts died of toxicity during consolidation treatment (2 arm A and 4 arm B), and 6 pts died of unrelated causes while relapse-free (5 arm A and 1 arm B). The 3-year PFS (primary endpoint) differed significantly between the two arms: 79% (95% CI 71-86) after HDC-ASCT and 53% (95% CI 43-62%) after R-DeVIC (HR 0.42; p=0.0003). The 3-year OS was 86% (95% CI 78-91) for HDC-ASCT arm and 71% (95% CI 61-78) for R-DeVIC arm (HR 0.47; p=0.01). The evaluation of neurocognitive functions showed no difference between arms. CONCLUSION: This international randomized phase III trial demonstrates that consolidation with HDC-ASCT results in significantly better outcome than non-myeloablative chemoimmunotherapy. This comes along without any measurable negative effect on neurocognitive functions and with an excellent risk-to-benefit ratio. HDC-ASCT is the standard consolidation therapy for fit PCNSL patients. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Abstract Introduction: Mutations (muts) in JAK2, MPL, and CALR are genetic hallmarks in myeloproliferative neoplasms such as myelofibrosis (MF). Prognostication in MF is predominantly based on clinical parameters according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS). However, gene mutations become increasingly important allowing for a more precised assessment of prognosis. For instance, CALR mutated MF is associated with favorable prognosis, while mutations in distinct high molecular-risk (HMR) genes are considered adverse. Our multicenter phase-Ib/II MPNSG-0212 trial (NCT01644110) investigating ruxolitinib plus pomalidomide in a total cohort of 92 patients with advanced MF and anemia provides an ideal basis for investigating the genomic landscape and molecular risk in a well-defined study population. Aims & Methods: To assess the genomic landscape in MF patients treated within the MPNSG-0212 trial and to correlate the results with clinical parameters and overall survival (OS). So far, targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) of 269 candidate genes was performed in peripheral blood or bone marrow from 81/92 patients using libraries prepared with SureSelectXT HS (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA). NGS was carried out on a NextSeq550 (Illumina, San Diego, USA). Results: At study entry, median age of the 81 patients was 71 years (range 52-86), median Hb 8.6 g/dL (range 5.4-11.7 g/dl); 30% of patients were RBC transfusion-dependent; 67% had primary MF (PMF) and 33% secondary MF (SMF), respectively. According to DIPSS, the vast majority of the patients were categorized as intermediate-2 (63%) or high-risk (26%) MF; 11% were low- and intermediate-1 risk patients. Overall, 315 muts were identified in 80/81 (99%) patients with a median of 3 muts/patient (range 0-9). Recurrent muts (≥5%) were identified in JAK2 (60%), ASXL1 (30%), SRSF2 (21%), CALR (20%; type-1: 75% [n=12], type-2 and non-type-1/2: 12.5% [n=2] each), MPL (19%), SF3B1 (19%), TET2 (16%), U2AF1 (15%), CBL and EZH2 (10% each), IDH2 and DNMT3A (7% each), PHF6, ZRSR2, and CUX1 (5% each). The majority of the patients (95%) was characterized by the presence of a driver mut in JAK2, CALR, or MPL; 4/81 patients (5%) were triple negative (Figure 1). JAK2mut was associated with TET2mut (p=.047), whereas muts in CALR and TET2 were mutually exclusive (p=.05). CALRmut patients had less co-muts than patients with JAK2/MPL muts (mean 2.5 vs. 4.1, p=.007) and were mutually exclusive with muts in the spliceosome regulating genes SRSF2, SF3B1, U2AF1, and ZRSR2 (p=.009). Compared to MF with mutated JAK2 or MPL, MF patients with mutated CALR had a longer median OS (not reached vs. 3.1 years; p=.04). With regard to high molecular risk (HMR) muts, n=56 were detected in 38 patients (47%), with 40% (15/38) of the patients harboring ≥2 HMR muts. The most commonly mutated HMR genes were ASXL1 (43%; 24/56), followed by SRSF2 (30%), EZH2 (14%), IDH2 (11%), and IDH1 (2%). MPLmut but not JAK2mut or CALRmut were significantly associated with HMR mut (p=.023). HMR mut patients harbored more co-muts than HMR wt patients (median 5 vs. 3; p<.0001). There were no significant differences in the variables age, sex, WBC, Hb, PLT, or LDH level between patients with HMR mut and HMR wt MF. In univariate analysis, patients with HMR mut MF had shorter median OS (2.3 vs 3.7 years, p=.007). In multivariate analysis (HMR mut, age, DIPSS-category, SMF vs. PMF) a higher DIPSS-score (HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0; p=.004) and muts in HMR genes (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.1; p=.003) were significant adverse prognostic factors for OS. Conclusions: Our NGS data underline the genomic complexity of advanced MF. CALR mutations were only found in 20% of the patients that were characterized by less co-mutations, mutual exclusivity with spliceosome mutations, and with more favorable outcome suggesting a distinct disease biology. Almost 50% of patients showed mutations in HMR genes which were associated with an inferior OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. §Frank Stegelmann and Konstanze Döhner contributed equally to this work. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Koschmieder: Shire: Honoraria, Other; Alexion: Other: Travel support; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support); Geron: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; AOP Pharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Abbvie: Other: Travel support; CTI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: (e.g. travel support), Research Funding; Image Biosciences: Other: Travel support; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karthos: Other: Travel support. Heidel: Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AOP: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hochhaus: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hebart: AbbVie: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Isfort: Alexion: Other: Travel reimbursement; Roche: Other: Travel reimbursement; Amgen: Other: Travel reimbursement; Mundipharma: Other: Travel reimbursement; Hexal: Other: Travel reimbursement; BMS: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel reimbursement. Reiter: AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Deciphera: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding. Waller: Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mylan: Consultancy; Alvotech: Consultancy; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; IPSEN: Other: travel grant. Scheid: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Goethert: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; zr pharma&: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel support; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Proteros Biostructures: Consultancy. Schafhausen: Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum AB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint Medicines: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Radsak: Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Other: e.g. travel support; Astellas: Other: e.g. travel support; TEVA: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: e.g. travel support; Amgen: Other: e.g. travel support; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Corat: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cogent Biosciences: Consultancy, Honoraria; JAZZ: Other: e.g. travel support. Gattermann: Takeda: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. von Bubnoff: Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Brümmendorf: Bristol Myers: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Repeat Diagnostics: Research Funding; Takepart Media: Honoraria. Döhner: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; GEMoaB: Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria, Research Funding; Oxford Biomedica: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Helsinn: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Berlin-Chemie: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding. Griesshammer: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AOP Orphan: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; CTI: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stegelmann: BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Döhner: Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Jazz Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Other: Advisory Board; Astellas: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios and Astex: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Pomalidomide was shown to be active in patients with myelofibrosis in particular in the treatment of anemia (Tefferi et al 2009, Begna et al 2011, Mesa et al 2010)

Abstract Purpose: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is common in advanced tumor stages or disease recurrence arising from gastrointestinal cancers, gynecologic malignancies, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Because current therapies are mostly ineffective, new therapeutic approaches are needed. Here, we report on a phase I study designed to assess safety, MTD, and antitumor activity of intraperitoneal administration of oncolytic vaccinia virus GL-ONC1 in advanced stage peritoneal carcinomatosis patients. Patients and Methods: GL-ONC1 was administered intraperitoneally every 4 weeks for up to four cycles at three different dose levels (107–109 pfu) following a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. GL-ONC1 was infused via an indwelling catheter that enabled repetitive analyses of peritoneal fluid biopsies. The primary study objective was safety of GL-ONC1 according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0 (CTCAEv4.0). Results: Patients with advanced-stage peritoneal carcinomatosis (n = 7) or advanced peritoneal mesothelioma (n = 2) received 24 doses of GL-ONC1. Adverse events were limited to grades 1–3, including transient flu-like symptoms and increased abdominal pain, resulting from treatment-induced peritonitis. No DLT was reported, and the MTD was not reached. Furthermore, no signs of viral shedding were observed. Importantly, in 8 of 9 study patients, effective intraperitoneal infections, in-patient replication of GL-ONC1, and subsequent oncolysis were demonstrated in cycle 1. All patients developed neutralizing activities against GL-ONC1. Conclusions: GL-ONC1 was well tolerated when administered into the peritoneal cavity of patients with advanced stage peritoneal carcinomatosis. Efficient tumor cell infection, in-patient virus replication, and oncolysis were limited to treatment cycle 1 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01443260). Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4388–98. ©2018 AACR.

Standard first-line therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia is treatment with imatinib. In the randomized German Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV, more potent BCR-ABL inhibition with 800 mg ('high-dose') imatinib accelerated achievement of a deep molecular remission. However, whether and when a de-escalation of the dose intensity under high-dose imatinib can be safely performed without increasing the risk of losing deep molecular response is unknown. To gain insights into this clinically relevant question, we analyzed the outcome of imatinib dose reductions from 800 mg to 400 mg daily in the Chronic Myeloid Leukemia-Study IV. Of the 422 patients that were randomized to the 800 mg arm, 68 reduced imatinib to 400 mg after they had achieved at least a stable major molecular response. Of these 68 patients, 61 (90%) maintained major molecular remission on imatinib at 400 mg. Five of the seven patients who lost major molecular remission on the imatinib standard dose regained major molecular remission while still on 400 mg imatinib. Only two of 68 patients had to switch to more potent kinase inhibition to regain major molecular remission. Importantly, the lengths of the intervals between imatinib high-dose treatment before and after achieving major molecular remission were associated with the probabilities of maintaining major molecular remission with the standard dose of imatinib. Taken together, the data support the view that a deep molecular remission achieved with high-dose imatinib can be safely maintained with standard dose in most patients. Study protocol registered at clinicaltrials.gov 00055874.