Comparison of adaptive critic-based and classical wide-area controllers for power systems.

Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions(2008)

引用 84|浏览0
暂无评分
摘要
An adaptive critic design (ACD)-based damping controller is developed for a thyristor-controlled series capacitor (TCSC) installed in a power system with multiple poorly damped interarea modes. The performance of this ACD computational intelligence-based method is compared with two classical techniques, which are observer-based state-feedback (SF) control and linear matrix inequality LMI-H(infinity) robust control. Remote measurements are used as feedback signals to the wide-area damping controller for modulating the compensation of the TCSC. The classical methods use a linearized model of the system whereas the ACD method is purely measurement-based, leading to a nonlinear controller with fixed parameters. A comparative analysis of the controllers' performances is carried out under different disturbance scenarios. The ACD-based design has shown promising performance with very little knowledge of the system compared to classical model-based controllers. This paper also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of ACDs, SF, and LMI-H(infinity).
更多
查看译文
关键词
classical method,acd computational intelligence-based method,acd-based design,power system,classical model-based controller,lmi-hinfin robust control,nonlinear controller,classical wide-area controllers,adaptive critic design,adaptive critic-based,classical technique,power systems,acd method,adaptive control,damping,linear model,computational intelligence,linear matrix inequality,comparative analysis,robust control
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要