Effect of an invasive strategy on in-hospital outcome and one-year mortality in women with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND:Subgroup analyses from randomized studies show inconsistent results regarding an early invasive approach in women with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We sought to investigate the impact of an invasive strategy in clinical practice, analyzing data from the German Acute Coronary Syndromes registry (ACOS). METHODS:Overall 1986 consecutive women were enrolled in the registry between June 2000 and November 2002 and were divided into two groups: 1215 (61.2%) underwent coronary angiography, 771 (38.8%) received conservative treatment. In the invasive group percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 40.7% within 48 h and in 16.4% after 48 h, whereas 8.3% underwent coronary artery bypass grafting within hospital stay. RESULTS:In-hospital death (3.2% vs 10.5%, p<0.0001), in-hospital death/myocardial infarction (MI) (7.1% vs 14.9%, p<0.0001) and one-year death (8.1% vs 24%) occurred significantly less often in patients with invasive strategy. After adjustment of the confounding factors in the propensity score analysis the invasive strategy showed no significant benefit for in-hospital death (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51-1.44) or death/MI (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.04) but remained superior for mortality (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.3-0.7) and death/MI one year after discharge (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.33-0.68). CONCLUSIONS:In clinical practice women presenting with NSTEMI have a long-term benefit from an invasive therapeutic strategy with a significant reduction in mortality as well as the composite endpoint of death/MI.