Should all stool specimens be routinely tested for Clostridium difficile?

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases(2010)

引用 13|浏览16
暂无评分
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency with which Clostridium difficile was detected in stool specimens from outpatients and patients hospitalized for less than 4 days to assess the usefulness of routine laboratory screening for detecting this enteric pathogen. METHODS: Seven hundred and forty-one specimens from 398 patients were cultured over a 6-month period for Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Campylobacter and Clostridium difficile. Clostridium difficile culture-positive samples were further tested for cytotoxin production. RESULTS: Campylobacter, Salmonella, Shigella and E. coli O157:H7 were isolated in 50 (6.7%) specimens from 35 (8.8%) patients. Clostridium difficile was cultured from 88 (11.9%) specimens from 35 (8.8%) patients and its cytotoxin detected in 35 (4.7%) specimens of 12 (3%) patients. Clostridium difficile was the second most frequent enteric pathogen after Campylobacter. Of 178 (24%) specimens submitted with a specific request for Clostridium difficile testing, 13 (7.3%) were cytotoxin positive (three patients); of 563 specimens for which Clostridium difficile was not requested, 22 (3.9%) were cytotoxin positive (nine patients). CONCLUSIONS: Nine of 12 patients with cytotoxin-positive specimens would have gone undiagnosed in the laboratory had all stool samples submitted not been tested. These results suggest that Clostridium difficile disease is under-recognized and that testing all stool samples for Clostridium difficile may be warranted in our community of patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
bacteria,feces,prevention
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要