Design of comparative clinical studies of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty using estimates from the coronary artery surgery study

The design of a prospective randomized trial of PTCA is discussed. It is suggested that patients with proximal subtotal occlusion of 1 or more vessels may be candidates for such a trial. Medical therapy as a control of 1-vessel CAD, medical or surgical therapy as a control for 2-vessel CAD (with 1 dilatable vessel) cases and surgical therapy as a control for 3-vessel CAD are most congruent with current practice. Possible criteria for comparison of PTCA with a control therapy include vital status, angina with daily activities, angina upon maximal exercise testing, MI, hospitalization, work status, cost, follow-up angiographic assessment, follow-up radionuclide ventriculography, measurement of immediate anatomic or hemodynamic change during initial treatment and quality-of-life indexes. These 10 measures are evaluated with respect to 9 desirable attributes for outcome criteria: the importance of the quantity measured, reproducibility, accuracy, low influence of investigator bias, low influence of subject bias, the measure is inexpensive and easy to obtain, sufficient occurrence to detect important differences, convenient to patients and measuring impairment due to disease.