Chrome Extension
WeChat Mini Program
Use on ChatGLM

To Elicit Or To Tell: Does It Matter?

AIED(2009)

Cited 30|Views16
No score
Abstract
While high interactivity has been one of the main characteristics of one-on-one human tutoring, a great deal of controversy surrounds the issue of whether interactivity is indeed the key feature of tutorial dialogue that impacts students' learning results. There are two commonly held hypotheses regarding the issue: a widely-believed monotonic interactivity hypothesis and a better supported interaction plateau hypothesis. The former hypothesis predicts increasing in interactivity causes an increase in learning while the latter states that increasing interactivity yields increasing learning until it hits a plateau, and further increases in interactivity do not cause noticeably increase in learning. In this study, we proposed the tactical interaction hypothesis which predicts beyond a certain level of interactivity, further increases in interactivity do not cause increase in learning unless they are guided by effective tutorial tactics. Overall our results support this hypothesis. However, finding effective tactics is not easy. This paper sheds some light on how to apply Reinforcement Learning to derive effective tutorial tactics.
More
Translated text
Key words
effective tactic,widely-believed monotonic interactivity hypothesis,high interactivity,interactivity yield,former hypothesis,effective tutorial tactic,reinforcement learning,tutorial dialogue,tactical interaction hypothesis,interaction plateau hypothesis,natural language
AI Read Science
Must-Reading Tree
Example
Generate MRT to find the research sequence of this paper
Chat Paper
Summary is being generated by the instructions you defined