Chi-square comparison of tryptic peptide-to-protein distributions of tandem mass spectrometry from blood with those of random expectation.

Proteomics uses tandem mass spectrometers and correlation algorithms to match peptides and their fragment spectra to amino acid sequences. The replication of multiple liquid chromatography experiments with electrospray ionization of peptides and tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI–MS/MS) produces large sets of MS/MS spectra. There is a need to assess the quality of large sets of experimental results by statistical comparison with that of random expectation. Classical frequency-based statistics such as goodness-of-fit tests for peptide-to-protein distributions could be used to calculate the probability that an entire set of experimental results has arisen by random chance. The frequency distributions of authentic MS/MS spectra from human blood were compared with those of false positive MS/MS spectra generated by a computer, or instrument noise, using the chi-square test. Here the mechanics of the chi-square test to compare the results in toto from a set of LC–ESI–MS/MS experiments with those of random expectation is detailed. The chi-square analysis of authentic spectra demonstrates unambiguously that the analysis of blood proteins separated by partition chromatography prior to tryptic digestions has a low probability that the cumulative peptide-to-protein distribution is the same as that of random or noise false positive spectra.