Heart Transplant Patient Outcomes: 5-Year Mean Follow-Up by Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography

BACKGROUNDS:We evaluate the feasibility and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as the first-line investigation in heart transplant patients and the rate of coronary allograft vasculopathy detected using CCTA.METHODS:From September 2003 to June 2009, we prospectively included 65 heart transplant recipients, retaining 62 who underwent yearly CCTA for coronary allograft vasculopathy detection (261 CCTAs). We used 16-slice, 64-slice, and 2×64-slice CT machines. Patients with coronary artery stenosis by CCTA had a confirmation and a further follow-up exclusively by conventional coronary angiography (CCA).RESULTS:No major coronary events occurred during the study. Of the 62 baseline CCTAs, 37 (60%) were normal, 18 (29%) showed wall thickening, and 7 (11%) known significant stenosis, confirmed by CCA. The mean follow-up duration was 5 years. At the last follow-up, 26 (70%) patients with normal baseline findings remained normal, 9 (24%) had wall thickening, and 2 (6%) significant stenoses. Time to stenosis was consistently greater than 3 years. Of the 18 patients with initially wall thickening, 14 (78%) had wall thickening and 4 (22%) significant stenosis at last follow-up. The mean interval without any coronary lesion was 9.46±3.98 years. The mean interval without de novo significant stenosis was 10.31±4 years.CONCLUSIONS:CCTA seems to be a safe noninvasive tool for monitoring heart transplant patients, and thus obviating the need for CCA. In patients with normal baseline CCTA, a 2-year interval between CCTAs may be safe.