Difference Of Clinical Course After Catheter Ablation Of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Between Younger And Older Patients: Atrial Vulnerability Predicts New Onset Of Atrial Fibrillation

Background The aim of this study was to compare the long-term procedural outcomes, the stability of atrioventricular conduction, and the new onset of atrial fibrillation (AF), after ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT).Methods and Results Consecutive patients with AVNRT (n=109), who underwent slow-pathway ablation, were divided into two groups based on the median age of the studied patients: the younger group aged <55 years and the older group aged >= 55 years. During a mean follow-up period of 60.6 months, the rate of change in the PR interval from before ablation to follow-up was significantly greater in older patients compared with younger patients. However, there was no delayed-onset high-degree AV block during follow-up in either group. No patients in the younger group suffered from persistent AF, whereas persistent AF occurred in 5/54 (9.3%) older patients. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that atrial vulnerability, with induction of AF during the electrophysiological study, was the only predictor of the development of AF (Hazard ratio: 13.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.62-119.2, p<0.01).Conclusion Slow-pathway ablation of AVNRT is a reliable strategy even in older patients. However, physicians should consider regular long-term follow-up of older patients with atrial vulnerability, in order to assess the subsequent development of AF.