Gefitinib For Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of Head And Neck: Phase Ii Trial

6054 Background: Advanced head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HN cSCC) carries a 30–40% risk of death by 2 years with standard therapies. Small molecular inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) may have an impact. We evaluated gefitinib as an induction therapy in a high-risk patient (pt) group prior to definitive therapy to determine efficacy, toxicity and feasibility. Correlative studies of EGFR expression, gene mutation, and ploidy may serve as predictors of response. Methods: Eligible pts must have HN cSCC >2cm, regional nodal metastases, peri-neural invasion, or deep invasion and must be candidates for definitive locoregional therapy with surgery and/or radiation. Two 30-day induction cycles of gefitinib (250mg po qd). Pts are assessed clinically after 15 days. If a response is noted, gefitinib is continued. For pts with stable disease, the dose is escalated to 500mg qd. Pts with progressive disease go off study. Total and phosphorylated (p) EGFR protein expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and gene copy number by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH). Results: To date, 23 pts are enrolled and 22 are evaluable for responses and toxicities. Complete responses (CR) were noted in 3 pts, partial response (PR) 7, stable disease (SD) 5, and progressive disease (PD) 7 (68.1% response per RECIST criteria). Minimal side effects are associated with gefitinib (cutaneous and GI related). EGFR and p-EGFR protein overexpression were observed in 5 of 11 (45.5%) pts tested thus far. Eight of the pts were FISH negative with respect to EGFR gene expression: 7 had low trisomy and 1 had low polysomy. Two were FISH positive and expressed high polysomy. No gene amplification was detected. No statistically significant correlations between EGFR gene or protein expression and responses to administration of gefitinib were found at this point in the analysis. Protein and gene expression analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: The preliminary results from our study are encouraging and suggest that anti-EGFR therapy may have a role in the adjuvant treatment of HN cSCC. Correlative studies may help identify pts most likely to respond to anti-EGFR therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.