Comparison of stochastic and regression based methods for quantification of predictive uncertainty of model-simulated wellhead protection zones in heterogeneous aquifers

IAHS PUBLICATION(2006)

引用 28|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
For a synthetic case we computed three types of individual prediction intervals for the location of the aquifer entry point of a particle that moves through a heterogeneous aquifer and ends up in a pumping well. (a) The nonlinear regression-based interval (Cooley, 2004) was found to be nearly accurate and required a few hundred model calls to be computed. (b) The linearized regress ion-based interval (Cooley, 2004) required just over a hundred model calls and also appeared to be nearly correct. (c) The calibration-constrained Monte Carlo interval (Doherty, 2003) was found to be narrower than the regression-based intervals but required about half a million model calls. It is unclear whether or not this type of prediction interval is accurate.
更多
查看译文
关键词
accuracy,computational requirements,Monte Carlo method,prediction interval,predictive uncertainty,regression based method,wellhead protection zone
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要