Comparing Three Methods for Dilution Accuracy of Intravenous Preparations

Caroline Rios,Renaud Vialet, Christine Dosmas,Anderson Loundou,Fabrice Michel

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing(2016)

引用 2|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Purpose: Dilutions of intravenous medications may be inaccurate. The mixing technique may be a crucial factor. Design: Three factors of dilution were tested: volume for dilution (large vs small), method for mixing (shaking vs inversion), and number of maneuvers (3 times vs 10). Methods: Dilutions of glucose in saline solution were made by nurses, after a random factorial plan. The judgment criteria were the comparison between measured (Cmes) and expected (Cexp) concentration. Finding: Cmes (n = 40) ranged from 89.5% to 123.6% of Cexp and was more accurate when made with a large volume (98.4% of Cexp vs 106.5%) and when mixed by inversion (100.6% of Cexp vs 104.6%). Conclusions: Inversion rather than shaking and dilution in a large volume is a simple procedure for bedside medication preparation that allows better accuracy. The 3 versus 10 mixing procedures resulted in the same accuracy, which may be important for these time-consuming procedures. These results should be confirmed in clinical situations.
更多
查看译文
关键词
pharmaceutical solutions/administration & dosage,administration,intravenous,syringes,research
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要