Quality and safety of ART therapies

P. Caballero, Javier Alonso, S. Cortés, M. Caballero Campo, María Isabel Jáimez Gago, Rocío Núñez-Calonge, Eveline A.M. Ricciarelli, J.L. Gomez Palomares, I. Bruna Catalan,Elvira Hernández, Veronika Grzegorczyk-Martin,J. Belaïsch-Allart, J.M. Mayenga, O. Kulski, M. Plachot, Hayley Darby, M. Florensa Bargalló,N Vázquez, M. Esbert Algam, M. Bellés Fernández, A. Ballesteros Boluda, Oya G, Maryvonne Miquel, M. L. Choudhary, A. Ramineni, Jay Stewart, Yolanda Cabello, S. Fernández-Shaw,Amparo Mercader, R. Herrer, Graciela Rivera Arroyo,Felipe del Río, Márcia Carréra, María Fernández Sánchez, T. Sumimoto,Nobuyuki Kataoka, Hidenori Ogata, Sachiyo Mizuta,Y. Tokura, Setsuko Yamada,Shinpei Ogata, Yuri Mizusawa, Yasuyo Matsumoto, E Okamoto,Shoji Kokeguchi, Masahide Shiotani, Yoshimitsu Nagai, J. Otsuki, Kazuko Maeda, Y. Momma, Katsumi Takahashi,M. Chuko, Akio Miwa, Akiko Nagai, J. Seggers, Maaike L. Haadsma,Sacha la Bastide‐van Gemert, Maas Jan Heineman, Johnn Henry Herrera Kok,K.J. Middelburg,Tessa J. Roseboom, P. Schendelaar, Edwin R. van den Heuvel,Mijna Hadders–Algra, M. Jongbloed-Pereboom,K.R. Heineman,Arend F. Bos, Laxmi A. Kondapalli, Alka Shaunik,T.A. Molinaro,S Ratcliffe,Kurt T. Barnhart, Maaike L. Haadsma, Patricia Keating, J.C. Van Hoften, H.E. Veenstra-Knol, Jan Maarten Cobben, C. Pirkevi, Z. Atayurt, H. Yelke, Selma Kahraman, Sonja Desmyttere, Willem Verpoest,Patrick Haentjens, Greta Verheyen, Inge Liebaers, M. Bonduelle, Catherine Winter, Frederik Van Acker, F. De Schrijver, J. Nekkebroeck, A. Pariente-Khayat, A. de Laubier, Deirdre Fehily, G. Lemardeley, Frederic Merlet, H. Creusvaux, Yukako Nakajo,Emi Sakamoto,M. Doshida, Masakazu Toya, I. Nasu, Kiyoshi Kyono, Remko Schats, C.G. Vergouw, E.H. Kostelijk, E. Doejaaren,Peter G.A. Hompes, C.B. Lambalk, Yoshimasa Nakamura, T. Takisawa,Y. Shibuya, Yoichi Sato, Kiyohisa Sato, Aurélie Bérard, Sebti Chaabane, Oonagh Sheehy, Linelle Blais, Walter Fraser, F. Bissonnette, Patrick Monnier, Shiong Tan,Jacquetta M. Trasler, Anand Subramaniam, Rhia Vicki Chiappetta, Andreas Mania, Geoffrey Trew, Scott Lavery,Olga van den Akker, Sarbjit Purewal, Craig A. Bunnell, Hany Lashen, P. Terriou, Carlos G. Giorgetti, G. Porcu-Buisson, Véronique L. Roger, J.M. Chinchole, V. Hamon, J. Allemand-Sourieu, L. Cravello,J L Moreau, V. Chabert-Orsini, F. Belva, Mathieu Roelants, Jo De Schepper,Paul Devroey, Rosalyn Painter, Laura Machin, Kenneth C. H. Fearon, K. Morishima, Akie Fujimoto, Hiroshi Oishi, Toshiyuki Hirata, Masamitsu Harada, Akihiko Hasegawa, Yuko Osuga, Takuo Yano, Shiro Kozuma, Yuji Taketani

Human Reproduction(2013)

引用 0|浏览64
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction: The effect of in vitro fertilization (IVF) on neurodevelopmental outcome is unclear. Probably, IVF does not affect traditional measures of neurological development in infancy, but little is known on long-term effects. Recently a new video-based instrument to evaluate neuromotor development was developed. The Infant Motor Profile (IMP) evaluates neuromotor condition in infants in terms of the quality of spontaneous motor behaviour. The IMP does not only assess traditional neuromotor domains, such as performance, symmetry and movement fluency, but also two novel domains: variation and variability. Movement variation denotes the size of the child's movement repertoire. Previous studies demonstrated that reduced movement variation is associated with early lesions of the periventricular white matter and - more generally - reflects the integrety of cortical connectivity. In addition, reduced variation during infancy is associated with neurodevelopmental disorders in later life and reduced intelligence at school age. Variability denotes the child's ability to select from the repertoire of movements the strategy that suits the situation best. In this prospective, assessor-blinded cohort study, we address the question whether ovarian hyperstimulation and/or the in vitro procedure affect movement variation during infancy. Material and Methods: Singletons born following IVF with conventional controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH-IVF, n = 68), following IVF in a modified natural cycle (MNC-IVF, n = 57) and following natural conception born to subfertile couples (Sub-NC, n = 90) were assessed with the IMP at 4, 10 and 18 months. The assessment resulted in a total IMP score and 5 domain scores: variation (i.e. the size of movement repertoire), variability (i.e. the ability to select motor strategies), symmetry, fluency and performance. Primary outcome was the domain score variation. Outcome variables were analyzed with a mixed effects model. Results: The mixed model indicated an overall effect of treatment on variation (p Conclusions: The preliminary data suggest that ovarian hyperstimulation may be associated with reduced movement variation in infancy. These findings stress the need to carefully monitor neurodevelopment in IVF offspring.
更多
查看译文
关键词
art,quality,safety
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要