Interlaboratory-concordance of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry for non-small cell lung cancer.

HISTOPATHOLOGY(2018)

引用 78|浏览39
暂无评分
摘要
AimsProgrammed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry has become a mandatory diagnostic test in the treatment of lung cancer. Several research initiatives have started to harmonise the five PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays that have been used in clinical trials. Here, we report data on interlaboratory and interassay concordance for commercial assays (assays') and laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) at 10 German testing sites. Methods and resultsTo assess interlaboratory concordance, a tissue microarray containing 21 pulmonary carcinoma specimens was centrally prepared. Pre-cut sections were stained at 10 sites by the use of assays 28-8, 22C3, SP263, and SP142, as well as 11 LDTs. Assay performance was evaluated with a second tissue microarray containing 11 cell lines with defined PD-L1 expression. Quality control was centrally performed by manual and digital analyses. The assays yielded reproducible IHC staining patterns at all sites. In agreement with previous studies, 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 showed similar staining patterns, whereas SP142 was distinct. Among the LDTs, six of 11 protocols showed staining patterns similar to those of assays 22C3 and 28-8. Interlaboratory concordance of tumour cell scoring by use of a six-step system was moderate (Light's = 0.43-0.69), whereas the clinically approved cut-offs of 1% and 50% showed substantial concordance ( = 0.73-0.89). Immune cell scoring by the use of SP142 yielded moderate concordance ( = 0.42). ConclusionsThe data confirm the previously described staining patterns of the assays, and show that they can be reproducibly employed at different sites. LDTs with staining results similar to those of the assays are implementable, but have to be carefully validated.
更多
查看译文
关键词
CD274 antigens,immunohistochemistry,immunotherapy,non-small-cell lung carcinoma
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要