Bidirectional Pull-Back Technique for Retrieval of Strut-Embedded Cylinder-Shaped Filters in Inferior Vena Cava.

MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR(2017)

引用 2|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
Background: IVC filters have been widely accepted as an effective method to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, the placement of IVC filters is associated with significant complications and filter retrieval can be challenging when the filter struts are embedded into the caval wall. Material/Methods: Over 26 months, we reviewed the safety and efficacy of the bidirectional pull-back technique for removing strut-embedded IVC filters in 15 consecutive patients. Retrieval procedural data such as in-dwell time, retrieval time, and fluoroscopy time were recorded. Clinical outcomes and procedure-related complications were evaluated by venography or enhanced computed tomography. Histologic tissue was analyzed to reveal the patho-logic effects of chronic filter implantation. All patients underwent routine clinical follow-up at a mean time of 12 months (range, 8-14 months). Results: Technical success of filter retrieval was achieved in 100%, with mean implantation of 46.6 days (range, 27-66 days). Filter types were as follows: OptEase (n=11) and Aegisy (n=4). The mean retrieval time and fluoroscopy time were 21.43 +/- 5.42 min and 7.63 +/- 2.67 min, respectively. Immediate postprocedure venography showed no procedure-related complications. Thirteen patients discontinued previously prescribed lifelong anticoagulation. There were no long-term complications during follow-up. Conclusions: The bidirectional pull-back technique is safe and efficient for filter retrieval. This complex technique can be particularly useful in selected patients to remove strut-embedded cylindrical-shaped IVC filters previously considered irretrievable.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Endovascular Procedures,Pulmonary Embolism,Vena Cava Filters,Venous Thrombosis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要