Detecting accidental punctures and lacerations during cholecystectomy in large datasets: Two methods of analysis.

Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International(2018)

引用 3|浏览3
暂无评分
摘要
Although CM may yield more false positives, it appears more inclusive, identifying more clinically significant APLs, than PSI-15. Both measures presented similar trends over time, arguing against inflation in PSI-15 reporting. While arguably less specific, CM may increase sensitivity for detecting APL events during cholecystectomies. These results may inform the interpretation of other large population studies of APLs following abdominal operations.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Cholecystectomy,Patient safety,Accidental lacerations,AHRQ PSI-15
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要