A five split-field three dimensional conformal technique versus an anterior-posterior on in postoperative radiotherapy for gastric carcinoma: a multicenter comparative study using quality of life measurements as well as clinical and dosimetric parameters.

Purpose: Several adjuvant approaches are regarded as available options in the management of localized, resectable gastric cancer. The objective of our study was to evaluate multiple field and anteroposterior conformal technique. Methods: Ninety-seven patients received three dimensional conformal (3DCRT) postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy for gastric carcinoma. Thirty-five patients received anteroposterior (AP/PA) fields (Group B), while 62 patients were irradiated with multifield technique (Group A). Their ages ranged between 29-85 years. The objective of the study was to evaluate the quality of life (QoL) for all patients after the completion of radiotherapy using the QLQ-C30 of the EORTC questionnaire (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) and to investigate any measurable differences between those two radiation techniques according to QUANTEC criteria and the radiotoxicity. Results: In terms of QUANTEC criteria, the multifield technique was superior concerning the left kidney (p=0.025), right kidney (p<0.001), spinal cord (p<0.001) and planning target volume (PTV) coverage (p<0.001). According to EORTC/RTOG toxicity criteria, the rate of diarrhea was higher in AP/PA technique (p=0.028). In terms of QLQ-C30, the multifield technique was superior concerning appetite loss (p=0.022), diarrhea (p=0.046) and global QoL (p<0.001). Conclusion: On the basis of QLQ-C30 questionnaire, EORTC/RTOG toxicity and dosimetric parameters, the present report has shown that the three dimensional multifield conformal radiotherapy is superior compared to AP-PA techniques.