Recognizing that Evidence is Made, not Born.

Robyn Lim,David K Lee, Pierre Sabourin, John Ferguson, Marilyn Metcalf,Meredith Smith,Solange Corriol-Rohou,Hans-Georg Eichler,Murray Lumpkin,Gigi Hirsch, Inhua Muijrers Chen, Brian O'Rourke, Anja Schiel, Nick Crabb,Naomi Aronson,Edmund Pezalla,Marc Boutin,Louise Binder,Linda Wilhelm

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS(2019)

引用 2|浏览40
暂无评分
摘要
Therapeutic product development, licensing and reimbursement may seem a well-oiled machine, but continuing high attrition rates, regulatory refusals, and patients' access issues suggest otherwise; despite serious efforts, gaps persist between stakeholders' stated evidence requirements and actual evidence supplied. Evidentiary deficiencies and/or human tendencies resulting in avoidable inefficiencies might be further reduced with fresh institutional cultures/mindsets, combined with a context-adaptable practices framework that integrates emerging innovations. Here, Structured Evidence Planning, Production, and Evaluation (SEPPE) posits that evidence be treated as something produced, much like other manufactured goods, for which "built-in quality" (i.e., "people" and "process") approaches have been successfully implemented globally. Incorporating proactive, iterative feedback-and-adjust loops involving key decision-makers at critical points could curtail avoidable evidence quality and decision hazards-pulling needed therapeutic products with high quality evidence of beneficial performance through to approvals. Critical for success, however, is dedicated, long-term commitment to systemic transformation.
更多
查看译文
关键词
adaptive regulatory and reimbursement framework,built-in quality,evidence quality,multi-stakeholder collaborative platform,proactive hazard analysis model,quality management,structured decision-making,therapeutic product life-cycle,therapeutic product research and development,assessment
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要