Differences in Muscle Contraction Onset as Determined by Ultrasound and Electromyography.

MUSCLE & NERVE(2019)

引用 11|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Introduction We characterize the agreement between the timing of muscle contraction onset detected by surface electromyography (sEMG), fine wire EMG (fwEMG), and motion-mode (M-mode) ultrasound for improved interpretations of clinical outcomes. Methods Eighteen healthy adults participated. Differences in contraction onset were compared between sEMG, fwEMG, and M-mode ultrasound collected during concentric contractions of the vastus lateralis and biceps brachii. Results The mean difference of 13.1 ms (-33.3-59.9) between sEMG and fwEMG was non-significant (intraclass correlation [ICC] = 0.60). Ultrasound was significantly different from surface and fine wire EMG (ICC = 0.65 and ICC = 0.40, respectively), occurring 98.6 ms (72.3-124.9) and 111.7 (60.3-163.0) before sEMG and fwEMG, respectively. Nonparametric interquartile ranges were also wide. Conclusions Due to high variability, comparisons between EMG methods should be interpreted with caution. Ultrasound detected onset before either EMG method, which may indicate motion from adjacent muscles during voluntary contractions. Muscle Nerve 59:494-500, 2019
更多
查看译文
关键词
contraction onset,electromyography,fine wire,motion-mode,ultrasound
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要