Large care gaps in primary care management of asthma: a longitudinal practice audit.

BMJ OPEN(2019)

引用 28|浏览14
暂无评分
摘要
Objectives Care gaps in asthma may be highly prevalent but are poorly characterised. We sought to prospectively measure adherence to key evidence-based adult asthma practices in primary care, and predictors of these behaviours. Design One-year prospective cohort study employing an electronic chart audit. Setting Three family health teams (two academic, one community-based) in Ontario, Canada. Participants 884 patients (72.1% female; 46.0 +/- 17.5 years old) (4199 total visits; 4.8 +/- 4.8 visits/ patient) assigned to 23 physicians (65% female; practising for 10.0 +/- 8.6 years). Main outcome measures The primary outcome was the proportion of visits during which practitioners assessed asthma control according to symptom-based criteria. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of: patients who had asthma control assessed at least once; visits during which a controller medication was initiated or escalated; and patients who received a written asthma action plan. Behavioural predictors were established a priori and tested in a multivariable model. Results Primary outcome: Providers assessed asthma control in 4.9% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing assessment included clinic site (p= 0.019) and presenting symptom, with providers assessing control more often during visits for asthma symptoms (35.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (18.8%) relative to other visits (1.6%) (p< 0.01). Secondary outcomes: Providers escalated controller therapy in 3.3% of visits and 15.4% of patients. Factors influencing escalation included clinic site, presenting symptom and prior objective asthma diagnosis. Escalation occurred more frequently during visits for asthma symptoms (21.0%) or any respiratory symptoms (11.9%) relative to other visits (1.5%) (p< 0.01) and in patients without a prior objective asthma diagnosis (3.5%) relative to those with (1.3%) (p= 0.025). No asthma action plans were delivered. Conclusions Major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. Targeted knowledge translation interventions are required to address these gaps, and can be tailored by leveraging the identified behavioural predictors.
更多
查看译文
关键词
asthma,knowledge translation,primary care,quality in health care,respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine)
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要