An ROI Comparison of Initiatives Designed to Attract Diverse Students to Technology Careers.

The Journal of information and systems in education(2016)

引用 23|浏览1
暂无评分
摘要
1. INTRODUCTION K-12 educators, higher education, government institutions, and business and industry partners have accomplished much the pursuit to attract diverse populations to study STEM-related disciplines (Brookshire et al., 2008; McCullough 2002). However, a critical shortage of scientists and engineers the U.S. remains. The Executive Office of the President and the National Science Foundation suggest tapping into underrepresented populations, specifically minorities and women, to fill the void (National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2013; Olson and Riordan, 2012) given the disparity that exists between the ratios of diverse populations our society and the number of diverse persons with high-level information technology related careers. The National Science Foundation reports that 2012, underrepresented men and women earned 18.8% of undergraduate degrees awarded science and engineering (National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, 2015). Diverse populations are less likely to have access and exposure to information technology resources during their K-12 education (Chisholm, Carey, and Hernandez, 2002) and are, therefore, less likely to be interested acquiring information technology education and pursuing information technology careers. Previous efforts to increase diverse studentsu0027 interest information technologies and STEM have included or were followed by studies to determine the effectiveness of particular strategies and approaches (Craig, 2014; Miliszewska and Moore, 2010; Mouza, 2008). Assessing the effectiveness of a programu0027s ability to increase a studentu0027s desire to study computing technologies and enroll and complete undergraduate computing technology degree programs is essential given that pilot funding for these programs is temporary. Stewards of programs to produce more computing technology graduates are obliged to measure, report on, and update their programs to ensure the programs produce cost-effective outcomes. The Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco reports that there is an increased interest impact investing. Specifically, when making socially responsible investments, companies and government agencies seek a Pay for Success (PFS) agreement to continue funding (Ragin and Palandjian, 2013). PFS backers pay service providers based upon measurable predefined prevention or intervention outcomes. Key aspects of PFS agreements include predefined investments (similar to grants) and the requirement that desired outcomes must be measurable. Evidence based methods such as ROI are increasingly being used to document achievements sponsored prevention and intervention programs (Kuklinski, 2015). We propose adopting ROI methodologies to examine the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase interest STEM careers. For purposes of this paper, we define the Investment component of ROI to include not only the in dollars quantifiable costs, but also the unquantifiable investments, such as volunteer efforts and in-kind donations. By focusing on ROI, we hope to simultaneously promote and improve the use of investment resources to increase the number of students receiving effective (positive ROI) intervention experiences. We hope to provide decision makers with justification for investing new financial resources needed to best support intervention efforts. This paper continues with a review and summary of existing programs focused on encouraging diverse students to pursue STEM careers and discuss how these programs report on outcomes and costs. Next, we present our comparison model where two similar programs were conducted and where both costs and outcomes were tracked for the purpose of comparing ROI. We end with a discussion of our findings and offer suggestions to those offering intervention programs on ways to better track the costs and outcomes of their programs so that they can report results using the ROI framework to be able to better distinguish and recognize the most effective programs. …
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要