Evaluation of safety and efficacy of periprocedural use of rivaroxaban and apixaban in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background We previously reported that dabigatran increased the risk of microthromboembolism and hemopericardium compared with warfarin. The safety of non-vitamin-K-antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in the periprocedural use of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism and hemopericardium in AF ablation among periprocedural use of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and warfarin. Methods and Results This study was a prospective, randomized registry. Patients taking NOACs upon visiting our hospital were randomly assigned into 2 groups; rivaroxaban and apixaban. Warfarin was continued in patients taking warfarin. Asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging on the day after the ablation procedure. In 176 consecutive patients (101 paroxysmal, and 75 persistent AF), rivaroxaban was used in 55, apixaban in 51, and warfarin in 70. There were no symptomatic cerebral infarctions in this study. Asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism was detected in 32 (18.4%) patients; nine (16.4%) with rivaroxaban, 10 (20%, p  = 0.80; vs. rivaroxaban) with apixaban, and 13 (18.8%, p  = 0.81; vs. rivaroxaban) with warfarin. Hemopericardium occurred in 5 (2.8%) patients; 2 with rivaroxaban, 1 with apixaban ( p  = 1.0; vs. rivaroxaban), and 2 with warfarin ( p  = 1.0; vs. rivaroxaban). In multivariate analysis, concomitant coronary angiography ( p Conclusions The incidence of asymptomatic cerebral microthromboembolism and hemopericardium in AF ablation is similar among the periprocedural use of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and warfarin.