Impact Of A Novel Pharmacist-Delivered Behavioral Intervention For Patients With Poorly-Controlled Diabetes: The Enhancing Outcomes Through Goal Assessment And Generating Engagement In Diabetes Mellitus (Engage-Dm) Pragmatic Randomized Trial

BackgroundMany factors contribute to suboptimal diabetes control including insufficiently-intensive treatment and non-adherence to medication and lifestyle. Determining which of these is most relevant for individual patients is challenging. Patient engagement techniques may help identify contributors to suboptimal adherence and address barriers (using motivational interviewing) and help facilitate choices among treatment augmentation options (using shared decision-making). These methods have not been used in combination to improve diabetes outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of a telephone-based patient-centered intervention on glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) control for individuals with poorly-controlled diabetes.DesignTwo-arm pragmatic randomized control trial within an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design.Subjects1,400 participants 18-64 years old with poorly-controlled type 2 diabetes.InterventionThe intervention was delivered over the telephone by a clinical pharmacist and consisted of a 2-step process that integrated brief negotiated interviewing and shared decision-making to identify patient goals and options for enhancing diabetes management.Main measuresThe primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were medication adherence measures. Outcomes were evaluated using intention-to-treat principles; multiple imputation was used for missing values in the 12-month follow-up. We used information from pharmacist notes to elicit factors to potentially explain the intervention's effectiveness.Key resultsParticipants had a mean age of 54.7 years (SD:8.3) and baseline HbA1c of 9.4 (SD:1.6). Change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.79 (SD:2.01) in the control arm and-0.75 (SD:1.76) in the intervention arm (difference:+0.04, 95%Cl: -0.22, 0.30). There were no significant differences in adherence. In as-treated analyses, the intervention significantly improved diabetes control (-0.48, 95%CI: -0.91,-0.05). Qualitative findings provided several potential explanations for the findings, including insufficiently addressing patient barriers.ConclusionsA novel telephone-based patient-centered intervention did not improve HbA1c among individuals with poorly-controlled diabetes, though as-treated analyses suggest that the intervention was effective for those who received it.