Efficacy and Safety of Massage for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Adam Perlman, Susan Gould Fogerite,Oliver Glass, Elizabeth Bechard,Ather Ali,Valentine Y. Njike,Carl Pieper,Natalia O. Dmitrieva, Alison Luciano,Lisa Rosenberger,Teresa Keever,Carl Milak,Eric A. Finkelstein, Gwendolyn Mahon, Giovanni Campanile, Ann Cotter,David L. Katz

Journal of general internal medicine(2018)

引用 51|浏览37
暂无评分
摘要
Background Current treatment options for knee osteoarthritis have limited effectiveness and potentially adverse side effects. Massage may offer a safe and effective complement to the management of knee osteoarthritis. Objective Examine effects of whole-body massage on knee osteoarthritis, compared to active control (light-touch) and usual care. Design Multisite RCT assessing the efficacy of massage compared to light-touch and usual care in adults with knee osteoarthritis, with assessments at baseline and weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, and 52. Subjects in massage or light-touch groups received eight weekly treatments, then were randomized to biweekly intervention or usual care to week 52. The original usual care group continued to week 24. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Participants Five hundred fifty-one screened for eligibility, 222 adults with knee osteoarthritis enrolled, 200 completed 8-week assessments, and 175 completed 52-week assessments. Intervention Sixty minutes of protocolized full-body massage or light-touch. Main Measures Primary: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index. Secondary: visual analog pain scale, PROMIS Pain Interference, knee range of motion, and timed 50-ft walk. Key Results At 8 weeks, massage significantly improved WOMAC Global scores compared to light-touch (− 8.16, 95% CI = − 13.50 to − 2.81) and usual care (− 9.55, 95% CI = − 14.66 to − 4.45). Additionally, massage improved pain, stiffness, and physical function WOMAC subscale scores compared to light-touch ( p < 0.001; p = 0.04; p = 0.02, respectively) and usual care ( p < 0.001; p = 0.002; p = 0.002; respectively). At 52 weeks, the omnibus test of any group difference in the change in WOMAC Global from baseline to 52 weeks was not significant ( p = 0.707, df = 3), indicating no significant difference in change across groups. Adverse events were minimal. Conclusions Efficacy of symptom relief and safety of weekly massage make it an attractive short-term treatment option for knee osteoarthritis. Longer-term biweekly dose maintained improvement, but did not provide additional benefit beyond usual care post 8-week treatment. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT01537484
更多
查看译文
关键词
arthritis,knee pain,massage,musculoskeletal pain,osteoarthritis
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要