Comparison of Technologies for CO2 Capture from Cement Production—Part 2: Cost Analysis

ENERGIES(2019)

引用 129|浏览7
暂无评分
摘要
This paper presents an assessment of the cost performance of CO2 capture technologies when retrofitted to a cement plant: MEA-based absorption, oxyfuel, chilled ammonia-based absorption (Chilled Ammonia Process), membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction, and calcium looping. While the technical basis for this study is presented in Part 1 of this paper series, this work presents a comprehensive techno-economic analysis of these CO2 capture technologies based on a capital and operating costs evaluation for retrofit in a cement plant. The cost of the cement plant product, clinker, is shown to increase with 49 to 92% compared to the cost of clinker without capture. The cost of CO2 avoided is between 42 Euro/t(CO2) (for the oxyfuel-based capture process) and 84 Euro/t(CO2) (for the membrane-based assisted liquefaction capture process), while the reference MEA-based absorption capture technology has a cost of 80 Euro/t(CO2). Notably, the cost figures depend strongly on factors such as steam source, electricity mix, electricity price, fuel price and plant-specific characteristics. Hence, this confirms the conclusion of the technical evaluation in Part 1 that for final selection of CO2 capture technology at a specific plant, a plant-specific techno-economic evaluation should be performed, also considering more practical considerations.
更多
查看译文
关键词
CCS,cement,techno-economic analysis,MEA-based absorption,chilled ammonia,membrane-assisted CO2 liquefaction,oxyfuel,calcium looping
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要