The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer.

Sven Tyge Langkjer, Julia Kenholm,Jeanette Dupont Jensen, Kim Wedervang, Annette Torbøl Brixen, Mie Grunnet,Lars Stenbygaard,Bjørnar Gilje,Hella Danø,Vesna Glavicic, Erik Hugger Jacobsen,Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen, Helle Lemvig Kruse,Trine Dongsgaard,Jeppe Neimann,Jürgen Geisler

FUTURE ONCOLOGY(2019)

引用 10|浏览25
暂无评分
摘要
Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.
更多
查看译文
关键词
breast cancer,chemotherapy,metronomic,NAME,Navelbine,Phase II trial,vinorelbine
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要