Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: Analysis from a High-Volume Institution.

Background: Gastric neuroendocrine carcinomas (G-NECs) are rare. This study aimed to explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with advanced G-NECs. Methods: The clinicopathological data of 175 G-NECs patients who underwent radical gastrectomy in a high-volume centre were collected. One hundred fifty-one cases with advanced G-NECs (laparoscopic gastrectomy [LG] = 30, open gastrectomy [OG] = 121) were finally selected for comparison of the short-term outcomes and oncologic efficacy. Results: In the postoperative recovery, when comparing the OG group, the time to ambulation (3.2 d vs. 2.6 d, respectively, p = 0.049), the time to first flatus (4.1 d vs. 3.6 d, respectively, p = 0.050), the time to first soft diet (7.9 d vs. 6.7 d, respectively, p = 0.007), and the postoperative hospital stay (13.1 d vs. 11.4 d, respectively, p = 0.047) of the LG group were shorter. There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication rates between the OG and LG groups (19.8% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.671). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 57.0% in the OG group and 64.4% in the LG group (p = 0.349). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 51.7% in the OG group and 57.4% in the LG group (p = 0.357). There was no significant difference in the 3-year OS and DFS rates between the LG and OG groups at each stage. The recurrence rate was 35.5% in the OG group and 33.0% in the LG group (p = 0.821). Conclusions: The short-term outcomes and oncologic efficacy of laparoscopic gastrectomy and open gastrectomy for advanced G-NECs are comparable. (C) 2019 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B. V.