Evidence of a Processing Advantage for Deservingness-Relevant Information

We investigated processing speed for deservingness-relevant versus deservingness-irrelevant information. Female students read stories involving deserved, undeserved, or neutral outcomes. We recorded participants' reaction time (RT) in processing the outcomes. We also measured individual differences in "belief in a just world" as a proxy for deservingness schematicity. RTs for deserved and undeserved outcomes were faster than for neutral outcomes, B = -8.45, p = .011, an effect that increased the stronger the belief in a just world (e.g., B = -3.18, p = .006). These findings provide novel evidence that the construct of deservingness is central in human social relations, and suggest both universal and particularistic schemas for deservingness.