Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction implemented by the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System over a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

PURPOSE:This study evaluated the long-term clinical follow-up results of patients who underwent double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). METHODS:Patients were assessed using clinical scores that included the Tegner activity level scale, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. KT-1000 was adopted to assess stability. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate osteoarthritis and LARS condition. RESULTS:This study examined 38 patients, of which follow-up procedures were completed for 33 patients, resulting in a follow-up rate of 86.8%. The average follow-up period was 11.9 ± 1.2 years (range: 10.3-14.2 years). The median scores of the clinical scales were as follows: Tegner activity score, 6 (range: five to seven); Lysholm score, 90 (range: 67-100); and IKDC score, 89.7 (range: 46-100). The median of the side-to-side difference (SSD) was four millimeters (range: 0-10 mm). In radiographs, the moderate OA rate was 6.9%. MRI results revealed that 26 patients exhibited ingrowth and 11 patients exhibited partial rupture of the LARS. With SSD ≤ 3 mm set as the standard for successful knee stabilization, the optimal cutoff point of LARS midsubstance thickness in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 14.3 mm. CONCLUSIONS:Long-term follow-up of the studied patients demonstrated the durability of LARS. However, clinical outcomes showed no enhancement using LARS, so it is not recommended for routine use in PCL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IV.