谷歌浏览器插件
订阅小程序
在清言上使用

Risk of Vasectomy Failure by Ligation and Excision with Fascial Interposition: A Prospective Descriptive Study.

Silvia Juliana Miranda Claro, Jonathan Vargas Laverde, Elsa Marino Samper, Milciades Ibanez Pinilla, Diana Soraya Torres Quiroz,Michel Labrecque

Contraception(2020)

引用 1|浏览5
暂无评分
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the occlusive failure risk of ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique. There are doubts about the effectiveness of this technique largely used in Asia and Latin America. Study design: We conducted a prospective longitudinal observational descriptive study among men who underwent a vasectomy performed under local anesthesia in a clinic specializing in sexual and reproductive health services in Bogota, Colombia. Three urologists used the Percutaneous No-Scalpel Vasectomy technique to isolate the vas deferens. They then ligated the vas, excised a 1 cm segment between ligations, and ligated the fascia on the prostatic end to cover the testicular end. We requested all patients to submit a semen sample three months after the vasectomy. We defined probable and confirmed vasectomy failure as 1-4.9 million sperm/ml and 5 million sperm/ml or more or any number of motile sperm observed on the last semen sample available, respectively. Results: Among 1149 participants, 581 (51%) had at least one post-vasectomy semen analysis. The overall failure risk was 5.2% (30/581; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6%-7.3%) with probable and confirmed failure risk of 1.9% (11/581; 95% CI 1.1%-3.4%) and 3.3% (19/581; 95% CI 2.1%-5.1%), respectively. Older men and one urologist had statistically significant higher risk of overall failure. Conclusion: Our study confirmed that the ligation and excision with fascial interposition vasectomy technique is associated with an unacceptable risk of failure. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Vasectomy,Ligation,Excision,Fascial interposition,Effectiveness,Failure risk
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要