Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing

DES Collaboration, Abbott Tim,Aguena Michel,Alarcon Alex,Allam Sahar,Allen Steve, Annis James,Avila Santiago,Bacon David,Bermeo Alberto,Bernstein Gary,Bertin Emmanuel,Bhargava Sunayana,Bocquet Sebastian,Brooks David,Brout Dillon,Buckley-Geer Elizabeth,Burke David,Rosell Aurelio Carnero,Kind Matias Carrasco,Carretero Jorge,Castander Francisco Javier, Cawthon Ross,Chang Chihway,Chen Xinyi,Choi Ami,Costanzi Matteo,Crocce Martin,da Costa Luiz,Davis Tamara,De Vicente Juan,DeRose Joseph,Desai Shantanu,Diehl H. Thomas,Dietrich Jörg,Dodelson Scott,Doel Peter,Drlica-Wagner Alex, Eckert Kathleen,Eifler Tim,Elvin-Poole Jack,Estrada Juan,Everett Spencer,Evrard August,Farahi Arya,Ferrero Ismael,Flaugher Brenna,Fosalba Pablo,Frieman Josh,Garcia-Bellido Juan,Gatti Marco,Gaztanaga Enrique,Gerdes David,Giannantonio Tommaso,Giles Paul,Grandis Sebastian,Gruen Daniel,Gruendl Robert,Gschwend Julia,Gutierrez Gaston,Hartley Will,Hinton Samuel,Hollowood Devon L.,Honscheid Klaus,Hoyle Ben,Huterer Dragan,James David,Jarvis Mike,Jeltema Tesla, Johnson Margaret,Kent Stephen,Krause Elisabeth,Kron Richard,Kuehn Kyler,Kuropatkin Nikolay,Lahav Ofer,Li Ting,Lidman Christopher,Lima Marcos,Lin Huan,MacCrann Niall,Maia Marcio,Mantz Adam,Marshall Jennifer,Martini Paul,Mayers Julian,Melchior Peter,Mena Juan,Menanteau Felipe,Miquel Ramon,Mohr Joe,Nichol Robert,Nord Brian,Ogando Ricardo,Palmese Antonella,Paz-Chinchon Francisco,Malagón Andrés Plazas,Prat Judit,Rau Markus Michael,Romer Kathy,Roodman Aaron, Rooney Philip,Rozo Eduardo,Rykoff Eli,Sako Masao,Samuroff Simon,Sanchez Carles,Saro Alexandro,Scarpine Vic,Schubnell Michael,Scolnic Daniel,Serrano Santiago,Sevilla Ignacio,Sheldon Erin,Smith J. Allyn,Suchyta Eric,Swanson Molly,Tarle Gregory,Thomas Daniel,To Chun-Hao,Troxel Michael A.,Tucker Douglas,Varga Tamas Norbert,von der Linden Anja,Walker Alistair,Wechsler Risa,Weller Jochen,Wilkinson Reese,Wu Hao-Yi,Yanny Brian,Zhang Zhuowen,Zuntz Joe

PHYSICAL REVIEW D(2020)

引用 156|浏览86
暂无评分
摘要
We perform a joint analysis of the counts and weak lensing signal of redMaPPer clusters selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 dataset. Our analysis uses the same shear and source photometric redshifts estimates as were used in the DES combined probes analysis. Our analysis results in surprisingly low values for S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) = 0.65 0.04, driven by a low matter density parameter, Omega(m) = 0.179(-0.038)(+0.031), with sigma(8) - Omega(m) posteriors in 2.4 sigma tension with the DES Y1 3x2pt results, and in 5.6 sigma with the Planck CMB analysis. These results include the impact of post-unblinding changes to the analysis, which did not improve the level of consistency with other data sets compared to the results obtained at the unblinding. The fact that multiple cosmological probes (supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic shear, galaxy clustering and CMB anisotropies), and other galaxy cluster analyses all favor significantly higher matter densities suggests the presence of systematic errors in the data or an incomplete modeling of the relevant physics. Cross checks with x-ray and microwave data, as well as independent constraints on the observable -mass relation from Sunyaev-Zeldovich selected clusters, suggest that the discrepancy resides in our modeling of the weak lensing signal rather than the cluster abundance. Repeating our analysis using a higher richness threshold (lambda >= 30) significantly reduces the tension with other probes, and points to one or more richness -dependent effects not captured by our model.
更多
查看译文
关键词
cosmological constraints,cluster abundances
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要