In-hospital Ischemic Stroke Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy.

Abstract Objective We investigated in-hospital stroke (IHS) treated by mechanical thrombectomy in comparison with out-of-hospital stroke (OHS) to clarify the points of concern in IHS at our institution. Methods Between September 2015 and June 2018, 19 patients with IHS who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (IHS group) were enrolled, and compared with 154 patients with OHS (OHS group) regarding patient characteristics, technical results, and outcome. In this study, we set the detection time in the IHS group as patient arrival time, termed “Door” in the OHS group. Results Cardiology and gastroenterology were the two main admitting departments, including four (21%) patients of IHS group. In all, 15 (79%) patients had atrial fibrillation; however, less than one-third of them was taking anticoagulant drugs at onset. There were only two cases of direct consultation to the stroke specialists, although IHS onset was mainly recognized by nurses. The median age in the IHS group was 81 (interquartile range (IQR), 76–86.5) versus 80 in the OHS group (IQR, 73–85; p = 0.43), and the median initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 21 (IQR, 16–23) versus 21 (IQR, 14–26; p = 0.92), respectively. Sex, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, etiology, and occlusion site did not differ between groups. The rate of use of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) was 26% in the IHS group versus 49% in the OHS group (p = 0.065). The median time of detection to imaging, detection to needle for IV-tPA, and detection to puncture were 32, 69, and 87 minutes, respectively, in the IHS group, being significantly longer than those in the OHS group (11, 30, and 50 minutes; p <0.01, p <0.01, and p <0.01, respectively). The median time of puncture to reperfusion was 39 minutes, being significantly shorter than that in the OHS group (82 minutes; p <0.01). Successful reperfusion defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b-3 was obtained in 94.7% of the IHS group versus 83.1% of the OHS group (p = 0.19). A favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) at 90 days was achieved by 36.8% (IHS) versus 35.1% (OHS) of patients (p = 0.88). The rate of symptomatic procedural complications was 0% (IHS) versus 7.1% (OHS; p = 0.23). The rate of death at 90 days was 15.8% (IHS) versus 12.3% (OHS; p = 0.67). Conclusion The times of detection to imaging and of detection to puncture in the IHS group were longer than those in the OHS group; however, patients in the IHS group had shorter reperfusion. The outcome of the IHS group did not differ from that of OHS group. Our study suggests that the time course of treatment should be improved and rapid stroke pathways involved in consultation with the stroke specialists for IHS should be organized.