Comparison of Four Commercial Kits for Isolation of Urinary Cell-Free DNA and Sample Storage Conditions.

DIAGNOSTICS(2020)

引用 15|浏览4
暂无评分
摘要
Urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an attractive body fluid for liquid biopsy. In this study, we compared the efficiencies of four commercial kits for urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolation and of various sample storage conditions. Urinary cfDNA was isolated from 10 healthy individuals using four commercial kits: QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (QC; Qiagen), MagMAX (TM) Cell-Free DNA Isolation Kit (MM; Applied Biosystems), Urine Cell-Free Circulating DNA Purification Midi Kit (NU; Norgen Biotek), and Quick-DNA (TM) Urine Kit (ZQ; Zymo Research). To assess the isolation efficiency, an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer with High Sensitivity DNA chips was used, and cfDNA yield was defined as the amount of cfDNA obtained from 1 mL of urine. MM and QC provided the highest cfDNA yield in the 50-300 bp range, and MM and NU gave the highest cfDNA yield in the 50-100 bp range. In particular, the NU kit was efficient for isolation of more fragmented cfDNA in the range of 50-100 bp with the lowest cellular genomic DNA contamination. ZQ had the best cost-efficiency for isolating the same amount of urinary cfDNA. Samples stored at -70 degrees C with the addition of 10 mM EDTA resulted in the highest cfDNA yield 3 months after sample collection.
更多
查看译文
关键词
urinary cell DNA,liquid biopsy,commercial kit
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要