Tigecycline Versus Colistin in the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Complex Osteomyelitis.

Journal of bone and joint infection(2020)

引用 6|浏览11
暂无评分
摘要
: complex is an increasingly important cause of osteomyelitis. It is considered a difficult to treat agent, due to increasing antimicrobial resistance and few available therapeutic options. : To compare effectiveness and tolerability of tigecycline and colistin in patients with osteomyelitis caused by carbapenem-resistant complex (CRABC). : This retrospective review included all patients admitted to a 150-bed tertiary hospital from 2007 to 2015 with microbiologically confirmed CRABC osteomyelitis for which they received tigecycline or colistin. Data on demographic and clinical characteristics, adverse events, and outcomes 12 months after the end of antimicrobial treatment were analysed and stratified according to the antimicrobial used. : 65 patients were included, 34 treated with colistin and 31 with tigecycline. There were significantly more men ( = 0.028) in the colistin group, and more smokers ( = 0.021) and greater occurrence of chronic osteomyelitis ( = 0.036) in the tigecycline treatment group. Median duration of therapy was 42.5 days for colistin and 42 days for tigecycline, with no significant difference. Overall incidence of adverse events was higher in the colistin group ( = 0.047). In particular, incidence of renal impairment was also higher in this group ( = 0.003). Nausea and vomiting were more frequent with tigecycline ( = 0.046). There were no significant differences between groups in relapse, amputation, or death. : Tigecycline had a better safety profile than colistin in the treatment of osteomyelitis due to CRABC, with no significant difference in outcomes after 12 months of follow-up.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Acinetobacter,carbapenem-resistant,colistin,osteomyelitis,tigecycline
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要