Upright Cheyne-Stokes Respiration in Patients with Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) is believed to only occur in supine and sleeping conditions, and thus, CSR treatment is applied to those specific states. Although CSR has also been described in patients with heart failure (HF) during wakefulness, its persistence in an upright position is still unknown. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to assess the predictors, clinical correlates, and prognostic value of diurnal CSR in upright position. METHODS Outpatients with systolic HF underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including short-term respiratory monitoring with a head-up tilt test to investigate the presence of upright CSR, assessment of chemoreflex response to hypoxia and hypercapnia, and 24-h cardiorespiratory recording. At follow-up, cardiac death was considered as the endpoint. RESULTS Of 574 consecutive patients (left ventricular ejection fraction 32 +/- 9%; age 65 +/- 13 years; 80% men), 195 (34%) presented supine CSR only, 82 (14%) presented supine and upright CSR, and 297 patients (52%) had normal breathing. Patients with upright CSR had the greatest apnea-hypopnea and central apnea index (at daytime and night-time), the worst hemodynamic profile and exercise performance, increased plasma norepinephrine and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and chemosensitivity to hypercapnia, which was the only independent predictor of upright CSR (odds ratio: 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.45 to 10.76; p = 0.007 vs. normal breathing; odds ratio: 4.01; 95% CI: 1.54 to 10.46; p = 0.004 vs. supine CSR). At 8-year follow-up, patients with upright CSR had the worst outcome (log-rank = 14.05; p = 0.001) and the presence of upright CSR independently predicted 8-year cardiac death (hazard ratio: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.08 to 5.29; p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS Upright CSR in HF patients is predicted by increased chemosensitivity to hypercapnia and is associated with worse clinical conditions and with a greater risk of cardiac death. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2934-46) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.