Performance of the Hologic Panther Fusion® MRSA Assay for the nasal screening of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES(2020)

引用 3|浏览27
暂无评分
摘要
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) nasal carriage screening is usually based on either culture or molecular biology. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Panther Fusion® MRSA Assay (PF) that proposes a complete automation of the molecular screening for MSSA and MRSA carriage. Four hundred thirty-four nasal samples collected on ESwab™ were screened using PF. Results were compared with standard culture on BBL™ CHROMagar™ Staph aureus and chromID® MRSA agar. Discordant results were analyzed with additional techniques: Xpert SA Nasal Complete on GeneXpert (GX), culture on selective agar after 24 h in broth enrichment, and, if necessary, characterization of mec gene and SCC mec cassette using DNA microarray. The PF presented an overall agreement of 97.5% for SA detection and 97.9% for MRSA detection. Furthermore, 7.1% (31/434) of the samples were SA-negative in primary culture but SA-positive using PF and GX, confirming the greater sensitivity of molecular tests compared with culture. Of note, 4 out of 30 MRSA-positive samples were not detected due to an atypical SCC mec cassette, while 2 samples were falsely detected as MRSA due to co-colonization with a MSSA drop-out strain and a methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal strain. Considering all results, the PF instrument appears as a reliable and rapid (< 3 h) package for MSSA/MRSA nasal screening. This technology using random access capability and direct sampling of the primary container is innovative and corresponds therefore to a new step in complete molecular biology automation in bacteriology.
更多
查看译文
关键词
Staphylococcus aureus,Nasal carriage,Screening,Hologic Panther Fusion® MRSA Assay
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要