Quantifying lahar damage using numerical modelling: Reviewer #1 response

100 Line 13: uncertainty in number and type of buildings – this parameter is in my opinion not to put in relation with potential building damage and its quantification. This is a question of scale and your objectives. What you may be rather referring to is the varying number and types of buildings, but uncertainty is misleading. Changed to ‘..., varying number and type of buildings...”. 105 Line 15: What is the “relative importance” of lahar hazard, etc.? ‘Relative’ as a word is irrelevant here, changed to “...examine the importance of lahar hazard...” Introduction Line 24/25: may add here Vallance (2000) as a reference 110 The reference to Vallance and Iverson (2015) is from the second edition of Encyclopaedia of Volcanoes were Vallance (2000) is from the first. They are functionally the same work. Line 28: again, careful with the word “uncertainty” here, I think it is not adequate Changed to ‘...varying number of elements...” 115