The proportion of endometrial tumours associated with Lynch syndrome (PETALS): A prospective cross-sectional study.

Background Lynch syndrome (LS) predisposes to endometrial cancer (EC), colorectal cancer, and other cancers through inherited pathogenic variants affecting mismatch-repair (MMR) genes. Diagnosing LS in women with EC can reduce subsequent cancer mortality through colonoscopic surveillance and aspirin chemoprevention; it also enables cascade testing of relatives. A growing consensus supports LS screening in EC; however, the expected proportion of test positives, and optimal testing strategy is uncertain. Previous studies from insurance-based healthcare systems were limited by narrow selection criteria, failure to apply reference standard tests consistently, and poor conversion to definitive testing. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of LS and the diagnostic accuracy of LS testing strategies in an unselected EC population. Methods and findings This was a prospective cross-sectional study carried out at a large United Kingdom gynaecological cancer centre between October 2015 and January 2017. Women diagnosed with EC or atypical hyperplasia (AH) were offered LS testing. Tumours underwent MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability (MSI), and targetedMLH1-methylation testing. Women <50 years, with strong family histories and/or indicative tumour molecular features, underwent MMR germline sequencing. Somatic MMR sequencing was performed when indicative molecular features were unexplained by LS orMLH1-hypermethylation. The main outcome measures were the prevalence of LS in an unselected EC population and the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and tumour testing strategies for risk stratifying women with EC for MMR germline sequencing. In total, 500 women participated in the study; only 2 (<1%) declined. Germline sequencing was indicated and conducted for 136 and 135 women, respectively. A total of 16/500 women (3.2%, 95% CI 1.8% to 5.1%) had LS, and 11 more (2.2%) had MMR variants of uncertain significance. Restricting testing to age <50 years, indicative family history (revised Bethesda guidelines or Amsterdam II criteria) or endometrioid histology alone would have missed 9/16 (56%), 8/13 (62%) or 9/13 (69%), and 5/16 (31%) cases of LS, respectively. In total 132/500 tumours were MMR deficient by IHC of which 83/132 (63%) hadMLH1-hypermethylation, and 16/49 (33%) of the remaining patients had LS (16/132 with MMR deficiency, 12%). MMR-IHC with targetedMLH1-methylation testing was more discriminatory for LS than MSI with targeted methylation testing, with 100% versus 56.3% (16/16 versus 9/16) sensitivity (p= 0.016) and equal 97.5% (468/484) specificity; 64% MSI-H and 73% MMR deficient tumours unexplained by LS orMLH1-hypermethylation had somatic MMR mutations. The main limitation of the study was failure to conduct MMR germline sequencing for the whole study population, which means that the sensitivity and specificity of tumour triage strategies for LS detection may be overestimated, although the risk of LS in women with no clinical or tumour predictors is expected to be extremely low. Conclusions In this study, we observed that age, family history, and histology are imprecise clinical correlates of LS-EC. IHC outperformed MSI for tumour triage and reliably identified both germline and somatic MMR mutations. The 3.2% proportion of LS-EC is similar to colorectal cancer, supporting unselected screening of EC for LS. Author summaryWhy was this study done? Endometrial (womb) cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological cancer in the developed world, and its incidence is rising. A significant minority (around 3%) of EC are caused by an inherited genetic predisposition called Lynch syndrome (LS). EC may be the first sign that a woman has LS. She is likely to survive this cancer but develop other preventable cancers related to LS later in life. Her family members are also at risk. Identifying women with LS can enable them to reduce their risk of new cancers, for example, through bowel (colorectal) cancer surveillance (colonoscopy). We do not know how many women with EC have LS or how best to identify them; current practice is based on experience in bowel cancer and may not be accurate in EC. What did this research do and find? We tested 500 women with EC treated in a large tertiary referral centre in the North West of England for LS. We did not preselect women to test based on clinical or tumour characteristics. We tested tumours for features of LS called mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency and microsatellite instability (MSI). Women with strongly suggestive clinical or tumour characteristics underwent germline LS testing. In total, 16 of 500 women (3%) had LS, and these women could not always be predicted by their age or family history. MMR deficiency was more accurate than MSI at identifying LS-EC, picking up 16/16 (100%) versus 9/16 (56%). What do these findings mean? In our study, we found that 3% of women with endometrial cancer have LS and can benefit from strategies to reduce their future cancer risk. Our results suggest that it may be best to test everyone because preselecting women to test based on clinical or tumour characteristics misses cases of LS. In this population, tumour MMR deficiency was more accurate than MSI at identifying LS in EC. Our results should be interpreted with caution because we did not do germline testing on all women, and the number of women we tested was relatively small.