Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Piecemeal Mucosal Resection for Superficial Esophageal Carcinoma and Precancerous Lesions

Objective: To explore the short and long-term outcomes of endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and multiband mucosectomy (MBM) for superficial esophageal carcinoma and precancerous lesions, and analyze the risk factors for prognosis. Methods: From March 1 2001 to May 31 2017, 371 patients with 416 lesions who were diagnosed as superficial esophageal carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasm and underwent EMR or MBM were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Long-term recurrence free survival (RFS) rate and the risk factors, including submucosal invasion, poorly differentiation, vascular invasion and positive vertical margin, for the long-term outcome were also analyzed. Results: The incidence of complication was 17.1% in the EMR group and 17.4% in the MBM group, without significant difference (P=1.000). The median follow-up period was 70.6 months. The 5-years RFS was 93.9% and 10-years RFS was 87.8%, respectively. Local recurrence was found in 2 cases in each group and they were curatively treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Heterogeneous multiple primary esophageal cancer was diagnosed in 5 and 3 cases for the EMR and MBM group, of whom 5 cases were curatively treated with endoscopic resection. Other 3 cases were diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer, of whom 2 patients died. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) was found in 5 cases in the EMR group and 4 cases in the MBM group, of whom 6 patients died. Distant metastasis was found in 5 cases in the EMR group and 3 cases in the MBM group, of whom 5 patients died. There were 83 patients combined with risk factors including submucosal invasion, poorly differentiation, vascular invasion and positive vertical margin, of whom 8 patients were diagnosed as LNM and 8 patients as distant metastasis. The 5-years RFS of patients with 1, 2, and 3 risk factors were 93.6%, 82.2%, and 25.0%, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Conclusions: EMR and MBM are both safe and feasible procedures for superficial esophageal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. Additional treatments should be selected according to the variety of risk factors to acquire better long-term outcome and life quality.