Effect of eccentric exercise on quality of life and function in people with chronic heart failure: a pilot randomised controlled trial

Purpose To determine if eccentric exercise was effective, safe and feasible in increasing function and quality of life in people with heart failure compared to usual care and a waitlist control group. Methods A prospective, three-armed, parallel-design, assessor-blind, pilot randomised controlled trial with 1:1:1 allocation. Forty-seven participants (16 female; mean age 66 years) with mild to moderate heart failure were randomly allocated to either eccentric exercise, concentric exercise or a waitlist control group. Participants in the exercise groups completed twice-weekly exercise for eight weeks. Primary outcome was walking capacity. Secondary outcomes were quality of life, leg strength and fatigue. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post intervention and three-month follow-up. Attendance, tolerability and adverse events were used to determine safety and feasibility. Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed no differences between eccentric exercise and either concentric exercise or waitlist for any outcome. Per-protocol analysis found improvements identified by the Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire were significantly greater post-intervention for eccentric exercise compared to concentric exercise (-17.99 units, 95% confidence interval -35.96 to -0.01). No major adverse events were reported. Conclusion In this small trial, eccentric exercise did not demonstrate superior outcomes to concentric exercise or a waitlist control group.