Contesting the massacre at Nataruk Reply

M. Mirazon Lahr,F. Rivera,R. K. Power, A. Moonier, B. Copsey,F. Crivellaro,J. E. Edung,J. M. Maillo Fernandez, C. Kiarie,J. Lawrence, A. Leakey, E. Mbuas, H. Miller,A. Muigai, D. M. Mukhongo,A. Van Baelen,R. Wood, J. -L. Schwenninger, R. Grun,H. Achyuthan,A. Wilshaw,R. A. Foley

NATURE(2016)

引用 4|浏览6
暂无评分
摘要
In the accompanying Comment1, Stojanowski et al. challenge the evidence for inter-group conflict at Nataruk2. They make two arguments—first, that the lesions in three crania are due to soil compression; second, that there is a correlation between body position and age, reflecting different burial traditions. We believe that their interpretation is incorrect on both counts.
更多
查看译文
AI 理解论文
溯源树
样例
生成溯源树,研究论文发展脉络
Chat Paper
正在生成论文摘要